Abstract
The evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of pure, beta radiopharmaceuticals is not possible with scintigraphy. Both whole-body autoradiography (WBAR) and Packard Instantimager, a device for rapid imaging, were used to study the whole body distribution of γ- and β-emitting radionuclides (99mTc-MDP,99mTc-sulfur colloid, or188Re-HEDP), and results obtained from both methods were compared. The biodistribution of99mTc-MDP and188Re-HEDP were seen mainly in bones including skull, spine, and vertebrae of spine and cardiac and skeletal muscles. The99mTc-sulfur colloid localized in liver, bone marrow, and spleen. The resolution of WBAR is superior than that of Packard Instantimager. However, the advantage of Packard Instantimager is that rapid imaging within few minutes is possible with it, while WBAR imaging requires several hours to days.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Y. Yonekura, A. B. Brill, P. Som, G. W. Bennet, I. Fand, J. Nucl. Med., 24 (1983) 231.
P. Som, Y. Yonekura, Z. H. Oster, J. Nucl. Med., 24 (1983) 238.
G. P. Wilkin, AL. Hudson, D. R. Hill, N. G. Bowery, Nature, 294 (1981) 584.
S. Yamada, K. Kubota, R. Kubota, N. Tamahashi, T. Ido, Autoradiographic study of67Ga citrate and18F-FDG in experimental inflammatory tissue. CYRIG Annual Report, 1994, p. 171.
I. Fand, R. M. Sharkey, D. M. Goldernberg, Cancer. Res. Suppl., 50 (1990) 885.
I. Fand, R. M. Sharkey, W. P. McNally, A. B. Brill, P. Som, K. Yamamoto, F. J. Primus, D. M. Goldernberg, Cancer Res., 46 (1987) 271.
K. W. Willis, D. A. Martinez, E. T. Hedley-White, M. A. Davis, P. F. Judy, S. Treves, Rad. Res., 69 (1977) 475.
W. Y. Lin, C. P. Lin, S. J. Yeh, B. T. Hsieh, Z. T. Tsai, G. Ting, Z. C. Yen, S. J. Wang, F. F. Knapp, M. F. Stabin, Eur. J. Nucl. Med., 24 (1997) 590.
T. N. Rao, Adhikesavulu, A. Camerman, A. R. Fritzberg, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112 (1990) 5798.
E. Deutsch, K. Libson, J-L. Vanderheyden, A. R. Ketring, H. R. Maxon, Nucl. Med. Biol. 13 (1986) 465.
L. Helm, K. Deutsch, E. A. Deutsch, AE Merbach, Helv. Chim. Acta, 75 (1992) 210.
G. Subramanian, J. G. Mcafee, Radiology, 99 (1971) 192.
A. Van Langevelde, O. M. J. Driessen, E. R. J. Pauwels, C. W. Thesingh, Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 2 (1977) 47.
J. Greiff, Injury, 9 (1978) 271.
E. B. Silberstein, Nonosseous localization of bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals, in:E. B. Silberstein (Ed.), Bone Scintigraphy, New York, Futura Publishing, 1984, p. 347.
I. Fogelman, R. Coleman, The bone scan and breast cancer, in:L. M. Freeman, H. S. Weissmann (Eds), Nuclear Medicine Annual, New York, Raven Press, 1988, p. 1.
L. I. Berna, J. R. Germa, M. Estorch, G. Torres, R. Blanco, I. Carrio, J. Nucl. Med., 32 (1991) 2295.
D. L. Munz, R. Kotter, I. Kornemann, I. Brandhorst, G. Hor, Bone marrow scanning versus bone scanning in the early diagnosis of neoplastic involvement of the skeletal system: A comparative parallel study, in:H. A. E. Schmidt, W. E. Adam (Eds), Nuklearmedizin, Stuttgart, Schattauer, 1984, p. 664.
M. C. Duncker, I. Carrio, L. I. Berna, M. Estorch, C. Alonso, B. Ojeda, R. Blanco, J. R. Germa, V. Ortega, J. Nucl. Med., 31 (1991) 1450.
S. N. Reske, J. H. Karstens, W. Gloeckner, A. Steinstrasser, A. Schwarz, J. Ammon, U. Buell, Lancet, 2 (1989) 299.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hwang, JJ., Yen, TC., Hsieh, BT. et al. Application of macroautoradiography and instantimage in radiopharmaceutical research. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 241, 581–587 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02347216
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02347216