Advertisement

Ecological Research

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 213–223 | Cite as

Roles of leaf water potential and soil-to-leaf hydraulic conductance in water use by understorey woody plants

  • Atsushi Ishida
  • Yasuo Yamamura
  • Yoshimichi Hori
Article

Abstract

Diurnal changes of leaf water potential and stomatal conductance were measured for 12 deciduous shrubs and tree saplings in the understorey of a temperate forest. Sunflecks raised the leaf temperature by 4°C, and vapor pressure deficit to 2 kPa. Although the duration of the sunflecks was only 17% of daytime, the photon flux density (PFD) of sunflecks was 52% of total PFD on a sunny summer day. Leaf osmotic potential at full turgor decreased in summer, except in some species that have low osmotic potential in the spring. Plants that endured low leaf water potential had rigid cell walls and low osmotic potential at full turgor. These plants did not have lower relative water content and turgor potential than plants with higher leaf water potential. There were three different responses to an increase in transpiration rate: (i) plants had low leaf water potential and slightly increased soil-to-leaf hydraulic conductance; (ii) plants decreased leaf water potential and increased the hydraulic conductance; and (iii) plants had high leaf water potential and largely increased the hydraulic conductance.

Key words

hydraulic conductance pressure-volume curve transpiration water potential water use 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Assmann S. M. &Gershenson A. (1991) The kinetics of stomatal responses to VPD inVicia faba: Electro-physiological and water relations models.Plant Cell Envir. 14: 455–65.Google Scholar
  2. Begg, J. E. (1980) Morphological adaptations of leaves to water stress.Adaptation of Plants to Water and High Temperature Stress (eds. N. C. Turner & P. J. Kramer) pp. 33–42. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Boyer, J. S. (1974) Water transport in plant: Mechanism of apparent changes in resistance during absorption.Planta 117: 187–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Calkin H. W. &Pearcy R. W. (1984) Leaf conductance and transpiration, and water relations of evergreen and deciduous perennials co-occurring in a moist chaparral site.Plant Cell Envir. 7: 339–46.Google Scholar
  5. Camacho-B. S. E., Hall A. E. &Kaufmann M. R. (1974) Efficiency and regulation of water transport in some woody and herbaceous species.Plant Physiol. 54: 169–72.Google Scholar
  6. Coleman M. D., Bledsoe, C. S. &Smit B. A. (1990) Root hydraulic conductivity and xylem sap levels of zeatin riboside and abscisic acid in ectomycorrhizal Douglas fir seedlings.New Phytol. 115: 275–84.Google Scholar
  7. Jones, H. G. (1978) Modelling diurnal trends of leaf water potential in transpiring wheat.J. Appl. Ecol. 15: 613–26.Google Scholar
  8. Jones H. G. (1983)Plants and Microclimate: A Quantitative Approach to Environmental Plant Physiology. Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
  9. Kira T. (1949)Forest Zones of Japan. pp. 41. Ringyô Gizyutu Kyokai, Tokyo (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  10. Körner Ch. &Cochrane P. M. (1985) Stomatal responses and water relations ofEucalyptus pauciflora in summer along an elevation gradientOecologia 66: 443–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kramer, P. J. (1983)Water Relations of Plants. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Küppers M. (1984) Carbon relations and competition between woody species in a Central European hedgerow. II. Stomatal responses, water use, and hydraulic conductivity in the root/leaf pathway.Oecologia 64: 344–54.Google Scholar
  13. Lo Gullo M. A. &Salleo S. (1988) Different strategies of drought resistance in three Mediterranean sclerophyllous trees growing in the same environmental conditions.New Phytol. 108: 267–76.Google Scholar
  14. Mansfield T. A. &Atkinson C. J. (1989) Control of stomatal behaviour.Importance of Root to Shoot Communication in the Responses to Environmental Stress (eds. W. J. Davies & B. Jeffcoat) pp. 71–80. British Society for Plant Growth Regulation, England.Google Scholar
  15. Maruyama Y. &Morikawa Y. (1983) Measurement of leaf water relations using the pressure-volume technique.J. Jpn. For. Soc. 65: 23–8 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  16. Mooney H. A. &Dunn, E. L. (1970) Photosynthetic systems of Mediterranean-climate shrubs and trees of California and Chile.Am. Nat. 104: 447–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mooney H. A. &Miller P. C. (1985) Chaparral.Physiological Ecology of North American Plant Communities (eds. B. F. Chabot & H. A. Mooney) pp. 213–31. Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Mott, K. A. &Parkhurst D. F. (1991) Stomatal responses to humidity in air and helox.Plant Cell Envir. 14: 509–15.Google Scholar
  19. Nilsen E. T. &Muller W. H. (1981) Phenology ofLotus scoparius.Ecol. Monogr. 51: 323–41.Google Scholar
  20. Nilsen E. T., Sharifi M. R. &Rundel P. W. (1984) Comparative water relations of phreatophytes in the Sonoran desert of California.Ecology 65: 767–78.Google Scholar
  21. Passioura J. B. (1988) Water transport in and to roots.Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 39: 245–65.Google Scholar
  22. Reich P. B. &Hinckley T. M. (1989) Influence of pre-dawn water potential and soil-to-leaf hydraulic conductance on maximum daily leaf diffusive conductance in two oak species.Functional Ecol. 3: 719–26.Google Scholar
  23. Salleo S. (1983) Water relations parameters of two Sicilian species ofSenecio (Groundsel) measured by the pressure bomb technique.New Phytol. 95: 179–88.Google Scholar
  24. Salleo S. &Lo Gullo M. A. (1990) Sclerophylly and plant water relations in three MediterraneanQuercus species.Ann. Bot. 65: 259–70.Google Scholar
  25. Scholander P. F., Hammel H. T., Bradstreet E. D. &Hemmingsen E. A. (1965) Sap pressure in vascular plants.Science 148: 339–46.Google Scholar
  26. Smith W. K. (1981) Temperature and water relation patterns in subalpine understory plants.Oecologia 48: 353–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tardieu, N., Katerji N., Bethenod O., Zhang J. &Davies W. J. (1991) Maize stomatal conductance in the field: Its relationship with soil and plant water potentials, mechanical constraints and ABA concentration in the xylem sap.Plant Cell Envir. 14: 121–6.Google Scholar
  28. Tenhunen J. D., Pearcy R. W. &Lange O. L. (1987) Diurnal variations in leaf conductance and gas exchange in natural environments.Stomatal Function (eds. E. Zeiger, G. D. Farquhar & I. R. Cowan) pp. 323–51. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.Google Scholar
  29. Tinklin R. &Weatherley P. E. (1966) On the relationship between transpiration rate and leaf water potential.New Phytol. 65: 509–17.Google Scholar
  30. Turner N. C. &Jones M. M. (1980) Turgor maintenance by osmotic adjustment: A review and evaluation.Adaptation of Plants to Water and High Temperature Stress (eds, N. C. Turner & P. J. Kramer) pp. 87–103 John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Tyree M. T. &Ewers F. W. (1991) Tansley Review No. 34. The hydraulic architecture of trees and other woody plants.New Phytol. 119: 345–60.Google Scholar
  32. Young D. R. &Smith W. K. (1979) Influence of sunflecks on the temperature and water relations of two subalpine understory congeners.Oecologia 43: 195–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zimmerman M. H. &Brown C. R. (1971)Trees, Structure and Function. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ecological Society of Japan 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Atsushi Ishida
    • 1
  • Yasuo Yamamura
    • 2
  • Yoshimichi Hori
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biology, Faculty of ScienceTokyo Metropolitan UniversityHachiohjiJapan
  2. 2.Department of Biology, Faculty of ScienceIbaraki UniversityMitoJapan

Personalised recommendations