Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of the femoral and pelvic geometrical parameters that are important for the hip joint contact stress: Differences between female and male

  • Published:
Pflügers Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The difference between male and female femoral and pelvic geometry was studied by considering some geometrical parameters such as interhip distance, inclination of the crista iliaca, diameter of the femoral head and centre-edge angle of Wiberg. The values of these parameters were determined for 79 healthy female and 21 healthy male subjects. Standard anterior-posterior radiographs were used and processed by the computer-aided system. The results show some important sex differences in femoral and pelvic geometrical parameters which determine the hip joint contact stress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hadley NA, Brown TD, Weinstein SL (1990) The effects of contact pressure elevations and aseptic necrosis on the long-term clinical outcome of congenital hip dislocation. J Orthop Res 8: 504–513.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Iglič A, Kralj-Iglič V, Antolič V, Srakar F, Stanič U (1993) Effect of the periacetabular osteotomy on the stress on the human hip joint articular surface. IEEE Trans Rehab Eng 1: 207–212.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Iglič A, Srakar F, Kralj-Iglič V; Antolič V (1994) The influence of pelvic shape on the stress distribution on the articular surface of the human hip joint. Zdrav Vest 63: 727–728.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Iglič A, Srakar F, Antolič V. (1993) Influence of pelvic shape on biomechanical status of the hip. Clin Biomech 8:223–224.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jaklič A Pemuš F (1994) Morphometric analysis of AP pelvic and hip radiographs. In : Zajc B; Solina F (eds.) Proceedings of the third Slovenian electrotehnical and computer science conference. Ljubljana, pp 352–355.

  6. Kummer H (1991) Die klinische Relevanz biomechanischer Analysen der Hüftregion. Z Orthop 129: 285–294.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Legal H (1987) Introduction to the biomechanics of the hip. In: Tönnis, Congenital Dysplasia and Dislocation of the hip, Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sviridov A I (1983) Anatomija čeloveka. Golovnoe izd., Kiev, Višaškola, pp 64–65.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kersnič, B., Iglič, A., Kralj-Iglič, V. et al. Determination of the femoral and pelvic geometrical parameters that are important for the hip joint contact stress: Differences between female and male. Pflugers Arch. 431 (Suppl 6), R207–R208 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02346341

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02346341

Key words

Navigation