Abstract
A comparison of auditory and visual perception of scatterplots showed similar correlation estimation performance in both modalities. The present study replicated this experiment using electrotactile (electrocutaneous) presentation of scatterplots on the fingertips and abdomen, as well as visual presentation. The correlation estimation task resulted in a slightly poorer performance on electrotactile scatterplots (abdomen r=+0.847; fingertip r=+0.723) compared with the previous Flowers auditory displays (r=+0.91). There were similar levels of performance in the visual (control) condition in both the studies (r for both approx.+0.91). The performance in the correlation estimation task was similar across the two electrotactile displays, with perhaps a slight, but not significant (p=0.077), advantage for the abdominal array. However, a preliminary digit identification task on both displays produced a better performance on the fingertip display (p<0.05), suggesting that the relative performance of the two displays may be task specific. The present results demonstrate electrotactile perception of complex graphs and provide useful information for improving future versions of tactile displays.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bolanowski, S. J., Gescheider, G. A., Verrillo, R. T., andCheckosky, C. M. (1988): ‘Four channels mediate the mechanical aspects of touch’,J. Acoust. Soc. Am.,84, pp. 1680–1694
Bolanowski, S. J., Gescheider, G. A., andVerrillo, R. T. (1994): ‘Hairy skin: Psychophysical channels and their physiological substrates’,Somatosensory Motor Res.,11, pp. 279–290
Cholewiak, R. W., andCollins, A. A. (1997): ‘Individual differences in the vibrotactile perception of a ‘simple’ pattern set’,Percept. Psychoph.,59, pp. 850–866
Flowers, J. H., andHauer, T. A. (1995): ‘Musical versus visual graphs: Cross-modal equivalence in perception of time series data’Hum. Fact.,37, pp. 553–569
Flowers, J. H., Buhman, D. C., andTurnage, K. D. (1997): ‘Cross-modal equivalence of visual and auditory scatterplots for exploring bivariate data samples’,Hum. Fact.,39, pp. 341–351
Grimnes, S. (1983): ‘Electrovibration, cutaneous sensation of microampere current,Acta Physiol. Scand.,118, pp. 19–25
Hinton, R. (1996): ‘Tactile graphics in education’ (Moray House, Glasgow, 1996)
Johnson, K. O., andHsiao, S. S. (1992): ‘Neural mechanisms of tactual form and texture perception’,Ann. Rev. Neurosci.,15, pp. 227–250
Kaczmarek, K. A., Webster, J. G., Bach-y-Rita, P., andTompkins, W. J. (1991): ‘Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems,IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.,38, pp. 1–16
Kaczmarek, K. A., andBach-y-Rita, P. (1995): ‘Tactile displays’, inBarfield, W., andFurness, T. (Eds): ‘Virtual environments and advanced interface design’ (Oxford University Press, New York, 1995), pp. 349–414
Kaczmarek, K. A., Tyler, M. E., andBach-y-Rita, P. (1997): ‘Pattern identification on a fingertip-scanned electrotactile display’.Proc. 19th Ann. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., pp. 1694–1697
Kaczmarek, K. A., andHaase, S. J. (2003a): ‘Pattern identification and perceived stimulus quality as a function of stimulation waveform on a fingertip-scanned electrotactile display’IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehab. Eng.,11, pp. 9–16
Kaczmarek, K. A., andHaase, S. J. (2003b): ‘Pattern identification as a function of stimulation current on a fingertip-scanned electrotactile display’,IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehab. Eng.,11, pp. 269–275
Klatzky, R. L., andLederman, S. J. (2002): ‘Touch’, inWerner, I. B. (Ed.): ‘Handbook of psychplogy, vol. 4’ Wiley, New York, 2002), pp. 147–176
Loomis, J. M. (1990): ‘A model of character recognition and legibility’,J. Exp. Psych.: Hum. Percept. Perf.,16, pp. 106–120
Loomis, J. M., Klatzky, R. L., andLederman, S. J. (1991): ‘Similarity of tactual and visual picture recognition with limited field of view’,Perception,20, pp. 167–177
Szeto, A. Y. J., andSaunders, F. A. (1982) ‘Electrocutaneous stimulation for sensory communication in rehabilitation engineering’,IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.,29, pp. 300–308
Szeto, A. Y. J., andRiso, R. R. (1990): ‘Sensory feedback using electrical stimulation of the tactile sense’, inSmith, R. V., andLeslie J. H. Jr, (Eds): ‘Rehabilitation engineering’, (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1990), pp. 29–78
Unitech Research Inc. (1992): ‘SBIR phase I final report: Haptic display of computer graphics for the blind’ Grant R43-EY08166, March 13, National Eye Institute
Unitech Research Inc. (1993): ‘SBIR phase I final report: A new electrotactile prosthesis for the blind’ R43-EY09499, August, Unitech Research, Inc.
Weinstein, S. (1968): ‘Intensive and extensive aspects of tactile sensitivity as a function of body part, sex and laterality’, inKenshalo, D. R. (Ed.) ‘The skin senses’ (Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1968), pp. 195–218
Wiker, S. F., Vanderheiden, G., Lee, S., andArndt, S. (1991): ‘Development of tactile mice for blind access to computers: importance of stimulation locus, object size, and vibrotactile display resolution’.Proc. Hum. Fact. Soc. 35th Ann. Meet., pp. 708–712
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haase, S.J., Kaczmarek, K.A. Electrotactile perception of scatterplots on the fingertips and abdomen. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 43, 283–289 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02345967
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02345967