# A fast method for calibrating video-based motion analysers using only a rigid bar

## Abstract

Video-camera systems are widely used in biomechanics and clinical fields to measure the 3D kinematic measurements of human motion. To be used, they need to be calibrated, that is the parameters which geometrically define the cameras have to be determined. It is shown here how this can be achieved by surveying a rigid bar in motion inside the working volume, and in a very short time: less than 15 s on a Pentium III. The exterior parameters are estimated through the coplanarity constraint, the camera focal lengths through the properties of epipolar geometry and the principal points with a fast evolutionary optimisation which guarantees convergence when the initial principal points cannot be adequately estimated. The method has been widely tested on simulated and real data. Results show that its accuracy is comparable with that obtained using methods based on points of known 3D coordinates (DLT): 0.37 mm RMS error over a volume with a diagonal ≈1.5m. A preferential absolute reference system is obtained from the same bar motion data and is used to guide an intelligent decimation of the data. Finally, the role that the principal points play in achieving a high accuracy, which is questioned in the computer vision domain, is assessed through simulations.

## Keywords

Motion analysis Stereo cameras Calibration Epipolar geometry Optimisation Evolution strategies## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- Azarbayejani, A., andPentland, A. (1995): ‘Recursive estimation of motion, structure, and focal length’,
*IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Machine Intell.*,**17**, pp. 562–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Borghese, N. A., andFerrigno, G. (1990): ‘An algorithm for 3D automatic movement detection by means of standard TV cameras’,
*IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.*,**37**, pp. 1221–1225CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Borghese, N. A., andPerona, P. (1993): ‘Calibration of a stereo system with points of unknown location’, Proceedings of the XIVth International Conference of the Society of Biomechanics ISB, Paris, pp. 202–203Google Scholar
- Borghese N. A., Cerveri, P., andFerrigno, G. (1997): ‘Statistical comparison of ILSSC versus DLT in the calibration of a photogrammetric stereo-system’,
*J. Biomech.*,**30**, pp. 409–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Cerveri, P., Ferrigno, G., andBorghese N. A. (1999): ‘Evolution strategies and epipolar geometry for dynamic calibration of photogrammetric camera system’,
*Med. Biol. Eng. Comput.*,**37**, (Suppl. 2), pp. 830–831Google Scholar - Cerveri, P., Borghese, N. A., andPedotti, A. (1998): ‘Complete calibration of a stereo photogrammetric system through control points of unknown coordinates’,
*J. Biomech.*,**31**, pp. 935–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Challis, J. H., andKerwin, D. G. (1992): ‘Accuracy assessment and control point configuration when using the DLT for photogrammetry’,
*J. Biomech.*,**25**, pp. 1053–1058Google Scholar - Dapena, J., Everett, A. H., andMiller, J. A. (1982): ‘Three-dimensional cinematography with control object of unknown shape’,
*J. Biomech.*,**15**, pp. 11–19Google Scholar - Faugeras, O. D. (1993): ‘Three-dimensional computer vision’ (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)Google Scholar
- Faugeras, O. D. (1995): ‘Stratification of three-dimensional vision: projective, affine, and metric representations’,
*J. Opt. Soc. Am. A*,**12**, pp. 465–484Google Scholar - Ferrigno, G., Borghese, N. A., andPedotti, A. (1990): ‘Pattern recognition in 3D automatic human motion analysis’,
*ISPRS J. Photogr. Rem. Sens.*,**45**, pp. 227–246Google Scholar - Hartley, R. I. (1992): ‘Estimation of relative positions for uncalibrated cameras. Computer vision-ECCV '92’ LNCS-Series, Vol. 588, Springer-Verlag, pp. 579–587Google Scholar
- Hartley, R. I. (1997): ‘Self-calibration of stationary cameras’,
*Int. J. Comput. Vision*,**22**, pp. 5–23Google Scholar - Hu, X., andAhuja, N. (1994): ‘Matching point features with ordered geometric, rigidity, and disparity constraints’,
*IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Machine Intell.*,**16**, pp. 1041–1049Google Scholar - Lenz, R. K., andTsai, R. Y. (1988): ‘Techniques for calibration of the scale factor and image center for high accuracy 3D machine vision metrology’,
*IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Machine Intell.*,**10**, pp. 713–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Luong, Q. T., andFaugeras, O. D. (1996): ‘The fundamental matrix: theory, algorithms, and stability analysis’,
*Int. J. Comput. Vision*,**17**, pp. 43–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Maas, H.-G. (1997): ‘Image sequence based automatic multicamera system calibration techniques’, IAPRS, Vol. 32, Part 5Google Scholar
- Marzan, G. T., andKarara, H. M. (1975): ‘A computer program for direct linear transformation solution of the collinearity condition, and some application of it’. Proceedings of Symposium on Close-range Photographic Systems, Champaign, ILGoogle Scholar
- Mendonca, P. R., andCipolla, R. (1999): ‘A simple technique for self-calibration’. Proceedings of IEEE Conference CVPR, Fort Collins, Colorado, pp. 145–151Google Scholar
- Weng, J., Cohen, P., andHenriou, M. (1992): ‘Camera calibration with distortion models and accuracy evaluation’,
*IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Machine Intell.*,**14**, pp. 965–979Google Scholar - Winter, D. (1990): ‘Biomechanics and motor control of human movement’ (Wiley & Sons)Google Scholar
- Wolf, P. R. (1983): ‘Elements of photogrammetry’ (McGraw-Hill, New York)Google Scholar