# Space-frequency quantiser design for ultrasound image compression based on minimum description length criterion

- 70 Downloads
- 5 Citations

## Abstract

The paper addresses the problem of how the spatial quantisation mode and subband adaptive uniform scalar quantiser can be jointly optimised in the minimum description length (MDL) framework for compression of ultrasound images. It has been shown that the statistics of wavelet coefficients in the medical ultrasound (US) image can be better approximated by the generalised Student t-distribution. By combining these statistics with the operational rate-distortion (RD) criterion, a space-frequency quantiser (SFQ) called the MDL-SFQ was designed, which used an efficient zero-tree quantisation technique for zeroing out the tree-structured sets of wavelet coefficients and an adaptive scalar quantiser to quantise the non-zero coefficients. The algorithm used the statistical ‘variance of quantisation error’ to achieve the different bit-rates ranging from near-lossless to lossy compression. Experimental results showed that the proposed coder outperformed the set partitioning in hierarchical trees (SPIHT) image coder both quantitatively and qualitatively. It yielded an improved compression performance of 1.01 dB over the best zero-tree based coder SPIHIT at 0.25 bits per pixel when averaged over five ultrasound images.

### Keywords

Minimum description length Wavelet coefficients SFQ Scalar quantiser Generalised Student t-distribution Ultrasound image## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

### References

- Achim, A., Bezerianos, A., andTsakalides, P. (2001): ‘Novel Bayesian multiscale method for speckle removal in medical ultrasound images’,
*IEEE Trans. Med. Imag.*,**20**, pp. 772–783Google Scholar - Antonini, M., Barlaud, M., Mathieu, P., andDaubechies, I. (1992): ‘Image coding using wavelet transform’,
*IEEE Trans. Image Process.*,**1**, pp. 205–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Barron, A., Rissanen, J., andYu, B. (1998): ‘Minimum description length principle in coding and modeling’,
*IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory*, (invited paper),**44**, pp. 2743–2760CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Berger, T. (1997): ‘Rate distortion theory; a mathematical basis for data compression’, (PH, Engle Wood Cliffs, New Jersy, 1997)Google Scholar
- Chang, G., Yu, B., andVetterli, M. (2000): ‘Adaptive wavelet thresholding for image denoising and compression’,
*IEEE Trans. Image process.*,**9**, pp. 1532–1546MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Chiu, E., Vaisey, J., andAtkins, S. (2001): ‘Wavelet-based space-frequency compression of ultrasound images’,
*IEEE Trans. Info. Tech. Biomed.*,**5**, pp. 300–310Google Scholar - Crouse, M., andRamachandran, K. (1997): ‘Joint thresholding and quantizer selection for transform image coding: Entropy constrained analysis and applications to baseline JPEG’,
*IEEE Trans. Image Process.*,**6**, pp. 285–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Gendron, P., andNandran, B. (2001): ‘Modeling heavy tailed correlated noise with packet basis functions’,
*J. Stat. Planning Infer.*,**112**, pp. 99–114Google Scholar - Kaur, L., Gupta, S., Saxena, S. C., andChauhan, R. C. (2003): ‘Compression of medical ultrasound images using wavelet transform and vector quantization’.
*IEEE-EMBS Asia Pacific Conf.*, Japan, pp. 170–171Google Scholar - Kim, Y. H., andModestino, J. W. (1992): ‘Adaptive entropy coded subband coding of images’,
*IEEE Trans. Image Process.*,**1**, pp. 31–48Google Scholar - Li, J., andLei, S. (1999): ‘An embedded still image coder with rate distortion optimization’,
*IEEE Trans. Image Process.*,**8**, pp. 913–924Google Scholar - O'hagan, A. (2003): ‘Modeling with heavy-tails. Bayesian Statistics’ (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003), pp. 345–359Google Scholar
- Papoulis A. (1991): ‘Probability random variables and stochastic processes’ (MHL, New York, 1991)Google Scholar
- Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vellerling, W. T., andFlannery (1992): ‘Numerical recipes in C, 2nd edn’ (Cambridge University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
- Przelaskowski, A., Kazubek, M., andJamrogiewicz, T. (1997): ‘Effective wavelet based compression method with adaptive quantization threshold and zero-tree coding’,
*Proc. SPIE*, Multimedia Storage and Archiving System-II,**3229**, pp. 348–356Google Scholar - Przelaskowski, A. (1998): ‘Fitting quantization scheme to multiresolution detail preserving compression algorithm’,
*Proc. IEEE*, p. 485–488Google Scholar - Rajpoot, N. M., Wilson, R. G., Meyer, F. G., andCoifman, R. R. (2003): ‘Adaptive wavelet packet basis selection for zerotree image coding’,
*IEEE Trans. Image Prcess.*,**12**, pp. 1460–1471MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Ramabadran, T. V., andChen, K. (1992): ‘The use of contextual information in the reversible compression of medical images’,
*IEEE Trans. Med. Imag.*,**11**, pp. 185–195Google Scholar - Rissanen, J., andLangdon, G. G. (1981): ‘Universal modeling and coding’,
*IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory*,**27**, pp. 12–23CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Roos, P., Viergever, M. A., Vanduke, M. C. A., andPeters, J. H. (1988): ‘Reversible intraframe compression of medical images’,
*IEEE Trans. Med. Imag.*,**7**, pp. 328–336Google Scholar - Said, A., andPearlman, W. A. (1996): ‘A new fast and efficient image codec based on set partitioning in hierarchical trees’,
*IEEE Trans. Signal Process.*,**5**, pp. 1303–1310Google Scholar - Sharipo, M. (1993): ‘Embedded image coding using zero trees of wavelet coefficients’,
*IEEE Trans. Signal Process.*,**41**, pp. 3445–3462.Google Scholar - Tsakalides, P., Reveliotis, P., andNikias, C. L. (2000): ‘Scalar quantization of heavy tailed signals’,
*IEEE Proc., Vis Image Signal Process.*,**147**, pp. 475–484Google Scholar - Westerink, P. H., Boekee, D. E., Biemond, J., andWood, J. W. (1988): ‘Subband coding of images using vector quantization’,
*IEEE Trans. Comm.*,**36**pp. 713–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Xiong, Z., Ramchandran, K., andOrchard, M. T. (1997): ‘Space frequency quantizatino for wavelet image coding’,
*IEEE Trans. Image Process.*,**6**, p. 677–693Google Scholar - Xiong, Z., Ramchandran, K., andOrchard, M. T. (1998): ‘Wavelet packet image coding using space-frequency quantization’,
*IEEE Trans. Image Process.*,**7**, pp. 892–898Google Scholar