Advertisement

Hip stress reduction after Chiari osteotomy

  • S. Herman
  • A. Jaklič
  • S. Herman
  • A. Iglič
  • V. Kralj-IgličEmail author
Article

Abstract

A mathematical model was developed to study the effect of the Chiari osteotomy on the distribution of contact hip stress over the weight-bearing area. It was shown that Chiari osteotomy can increase the weight-bearing area directly (on the lateral side), owing to the additional area formed by theala ossis ilii segment, and indirectly (on the medial side), owing to the shift of the stress pole in the medial direction. As a consequence, the contact hip stress is reduced after Chiari osteotomy. The indirect effect is important and often larger than the direct one. Using the proposed mathematical model and standard anteroposterior roentgenographs from archives, the average peak stress on the weight-bearing area, normalised with respect to the body weight (pmax/WB), was determined before and after Chiari osteotomy (8310m−2 and 4480m−2, respectively) on a population of 29 dysplastic hips. The difference was statistically significant (p<0.005). Based on the results presented, it can be concluded that the hip joint contact stress in dysplastic hips considerably decreases after Chiari osteotomy, indicating a favourable biomechanical effect of this operation.

Keywords

Chiari osteotomy Hip joint Contact stress Mathematical modelling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Antolič, V., Srakar, F., Kralj-Iglič, V., Iglič, A., Zaletel-Kragelj, L., andMaček-Lebar, A. (1996): ‘Changes in configuration of the hip due to Chiari Osteotomy’,Orthopaedics,4, pp. 183–186Google Scholar
  2. Brand, R. A., Pedersen, D. R., Davy, D. T., Kotzar, G. M., Heiple, K. G., andGoldberg, V. M. (1994): ‘Comparison of hip force calculation and measurements in the same patient’,J. Arthroplasty,9, pp. 45–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brand, R. A. (1997): ‘Hip osteotomies: a biomechanical consideration’,J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg.,5, pp. 282–291Google Scholar
  4. Brand, R. A., Iglič, A., andKralj-Iglič, V. (2001): ‘Contact stress in the human hip: implications for disease and treatment’,Hip Int.,11, pp. 117–126Google Scholar
  5. Brinckmann, P., Frobin, W., andHierholzer, E. (1981): ‘Stress on the articular surface of the hip joint in healthy adults and persons with idiopathic osteoarthrosis of the hip joint’,J. Biomech.,14, pp. 149–156Google Scholar
  6. Busse, J., Gasteiger, W., andTönnis D. (1972): ‘Eine neue Methode zur röntgenologischen Beurteilung eines Hüftgelenks—der Hüftwert’,Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg.,72, pp. 1–9Google Scholar
  7. Charnley, J., andPusso, R. (1968): ‘The recording and the analysis of gait in relation to the surgery of the hip joint’,Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res.,58, pp. 153–164Google Scholar
  8. Chiari, K. (1953): ‘Beckenosteotomie zur Pfannendachplastik’,Wien Med. Wochenschr.,103, pp. 707–714Google Scholar
  9. Daniel, M., Antolič, V., Iglič, A., andKralj-Iglič, V. (2001): ‘Determination of contact stress from nomograms based on mathematical model’,Med. Eng. Phys.,23, pp. 347–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Delp, S. L., Bleck, E. E., Zajac, F. E., andBollini, G. (1990): ‘Biomechanical analysis of the Chiari pelvic osteotomy-preserving hip abductor strength’,Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res.,254, pp. 189–198Google Scholar
  11. Eberhardt, A. W., Lewis, J. L., andKeer, L. M. (1991): ‘Contact of layered elastic spheres as a model of joint contact: effect of tangential load and friction’,J. Biomech. Eng.,113, pp. 107–108Google Scholar
  12. Ganz, R., Klaus, K., Vinh, T. S., andMast, J. W. (1988): ‘A new periacetabular osteotomy of hip dysplasia-technique and preliminary results’,Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res.,232, pp. 26–36Google Scholar
  13. Hadley, N. A., Brown, T. D., andWeinstein, S. L. (1990): ‘The effects of contact pressure elevations and aseptic necrosis on the long term clinical outcome of congenital hip dislocation’,J. Orthop. Res.,64, pp. 513–518Google Scholar
  14. Hefti, F. (1995): ‘Spherical assessment of the hip on standard AP radiographs. A simple method for the measurement of the contact area between acetabulum and femoral head and of acetabular orientation’,J. Pediatr. Orthop.,15, pp. 797–805Google Scholar
  15. Hipp, J. A., Sugano, N., Millis, M. B., andMurphy, S. B. (1999): ‘Planning acetabular redirection osteotomies based on joint contact pressures’,Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res.,364, pp. 134–143Google Scholar
  16. Iglič, A., Kralj-Iglič, V., Antolič, V., Srakar, F., andStanič, U. (1993a): ‘Effect of the periacetabular osteotomy on the stress on the human hip joint articular surface’,IEEE Trans. Rehab. Eng.,1, pp. 207–212Google Scholar
  17. Iglič, A., Srakar, F., andAntolič, V. (1993b): ‘Biomechanical pelvic shape on the biomechanical status of the hip’,Clin. Biomech.,8, pp. 233–234Google Scholar
  18. Iglič, A., Antolič, V., andSrakar, F. (1993c): ‘Biomechanical analysis of various operative hip joint rotation center shifts’,Arch. Orthop Trauma Surg.,112, pp. 124–126Google Scholar
  19. Iglič, A., Daniel, M., Kralj-Iglič, V., Antolič, V., andJaklič, A. (2001): ‘Peak hip-joint contact stress in male and female populations’,J. Musculoskeletal Res.,5, pp. 17–21Google Scholar
  20. Ipavec, M., Brand, R. A., Pedersen, D. R., Mavčič, B., Kralj-Iglič, V., andIglič, A. (1999): ‘Mathematical modelling of stress in the hip during gait’,J. Biomech.,32, pp. 1229–1235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnston, R. C., Brand, R. A., andCrowninshield, R. D. (1979): ‘Reconstruction of the hip’,J. Bone Joint Surg.,61A, pp. 639–652Google Scholar
  22. Kersnič, B., Iglič, A., Kralj-Iglič, V., Srakar, F., andAntolič, V. (1997): ‘Increased incidence of arthrosis in women could be related to femoral and pelvic shape’,Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg.,116, pp. 345–347Google Scholar
  23. Kummer, B. (1991): ‘Die klinische Relevanz biomechanischer Analysen der Hüftregion’,Z. Orthop.,129, pp. 285–294Google Scholar
  24. Lipshitz, H., andGlimcher, M. J. (1979): ‘In vitro studies of the wear of articular cartilage: II. Characteristics of the wear of articular cartilage when worn against stainless steel plates having characterized surfaces’,Wear,52, pp. 297–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maxian, T. A., Brown, T. D., andWeinstein, S. L. (1995): ‘Chronic stress tolerance levels for human articular cartilage: two nonuniform contact models applied to long term follow up of CDH’,J. Biomech.,28, pp. 159–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McLeish, R. D., andCharnley, J. (1970): ‘Abduction forces in the one legged stance’,J. Biomech.,3, pp. 191–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McCutchen, C. W. (1962): ‘The frictional properties of animal joints’,Wear,5, pp. 1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Migaud, H., Duquennoy, A., Gougeon, F., Fontaine, C., andPasquier, G. (1995): ‘Outcome of Chiari pelvic osteotomy in adults’,Acta Orthop. Scand.,66, pp. 127–131Google Scholar
  29. Millis, M. B., Murphy, S. B., andPoss, R. (1995): ‘Osteotomies about the hip for the prevention and treatment of osteoarthrosis’,J. Bone Joint Surg.,77A, pp. 626–647Google Scholar
  30. Murphy, S. B., Millis, M. B., andHal, J. E. (1999): ‘Surgical correction of acetabular dysplasia in the adult’,Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res.,363, pp. 38–44Google Scholar
  31. Nishina, T., Saito, S., Ozhono, K., Shimizu, N., Hosoya, T., andOno, K. (1990): ‘Chiari pelvic osteotomy for osteoarthritis’,J. Bone Joint Surg.,72B, pp. 765–769Google Scholar
  32. Osebold, W. R., Lester, E. L., andWatson, P. (1997): ‘Dynamics of hip joint remodeling after Chiari osteotomy’,Acta Orthop. Scand.,68, pp. 128–132Google Scholar
  33. Pauwels, F. (1976): ‘Biomechanics of the normal and diseased hip’ (Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1976)Google Scholar
  34. Pedersen, D. R., Brand, R. A., andDavy, D. T. (1997): ‘Pelvic muscle and acetabular contact forces during gait’,J. Biomech.,30, pp. 959–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reynolds, D. A. (1986): ‘Chiari innominate osteotomy in adults’,J. Bone Joint Surg.,68B, pp. 45–54Google Scholar
  36. Srakar, F., Iglič, A., Antolič, V., andHerman, S. (1992): ‘Computer simulation of periacetabular osteotomy’,Acta Orthop. Scand.,63, pp. 411–412Google Scholar
  37. Vengust, R., Daniel, M., Antolič, V., Zupanc, O., Iglič, A., andKraij-Iglič, V. (2001): ‘Biomechanical evaluation of hip joint after Salter innominate osteotomy: a long-term follow-up study’,Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg.,40, pp. 511–516Google Scholar
  38. Wiberg, G. (1939): ‘Studies on dysplastic acetabula and congenital subluxation of the hip joint with special reference to the complications of osteoarthritis’,Acta Scand. Chir.,58, pp. 1–83Google Scholar
  39. Windhager, R., Pongracy, N., Schönecker, W., andKotz, R. (1991): ‘Chiari osteotomy for congenital dislocation and subluxation of the hip’,J. Bone Joint Surg.,73B, pp. 890–895Google Scholar
  40. Zupanc, O., Antolič, V., Iglič, A., Jaklič, A., Kralj-Iglič, V., Stare, J., andVengust, R. (2001): ‘The assessment of contact stress in the hip joint after operative treatment for severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis’,Int. Orthop.,25, pp. 9–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFMBE 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Herman
    • 1
  • A. Jaklič
    • 2
  • S. Herman
    • 3
  • A. Iglič
    • 4
  • V. Kralj-Iglič
    • 3
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Clinical Department of TraumatologyUniversity Medical CenterLjubljanaSlovenia
  2. 2.Institute of Metals & TechnologyLjubljanaSlovenia
  3. 3.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity Medical CenterLjubljanaSlovenia
  4. 4.Laboratory of Applied PhysicsFaculty of Electrical EngineeringLjubljanaSlovenia
  5. 5.Institute of BiophysicsFaculty of MedicineLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations