Biomechanical modelling of orthotic treatment of the scoliotic spine including a detailed representation of the brace-torso interface

  • D. Périé
  • C. E. Aubin
  • M. Lacroix
  • Y. Lafon
  • H. Labelle
Article

Abstract

As part of the development of new modelling tools for the simulation and design of brace treatment of scoliosis, a finite element model of a brace and its interface with the torso was proposed. The model was adapted to represent one scoliotic adolescent girl treated with a Boston brace. The 3D geometry was acquired using multiview radiographs. The model included the osseo-ligamentous structures, thoracic and abdominal soft tissues, brace foam and shell, and brace-torso interface. The simulations consisted of brace opening to include the patient's trunk followed by brace closing. To validate the model, the resulting geometry was compared with the real in-brace geometry, and the resulting contact reaction forces at the brace-torso interface were compared with the equivalent forces calculated from pressure measurements made on the in-brace patient. Differences between coronal equivalent and reaction forces were less than 7N. However, sagittal reaction forces (47N) were computed on the abdomen, whereas negligible equivalent forces were measured. The simulated geometry presented partially reduced coronal Cobb angles (1–40), over-corrected sagittal Cobb angles and maximum deformation plane (50), completely corrected coronal shift, and sagittal shift and rib humps that were not corrected. This study demonstrated the feasibility of a new approach that represents the load transfer from the brace to the spine more realistically than does the direct application of forces.

Keywords

Scoliosis Finite element modelling Boston brace Brace-torso interface 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andriacchi, T. P., Schultz, A. B., Belytschko, T., andDewald, R. L. (1976): ‘Milwaukee brace correction of idiopathic scoliosis’,J. Bone Joint Surg.,58A, pp. 806–815Google Scholar
  2. Aubin, C. É., Dansereau, J., andLabelle, H. (1993): ‘Biomechanical simulation of the effect of the Boston brace on a model of the scoliotic spine and thorax (in French)’,Ann. Chir.,47, pp. 881–887Google Scholar
  3. Aubin, C. E., Descrimes, J. L., Dansereau, J., Skalli, W., Lavaste, F., andLabelle, H. (1995): ‘Geometrical modeling of the spine and thorax for biomechanical analysis of scoliotic deformities using finite element method (in French)’,Ann. Chir.,49, pp. 749–761Google Scholar
  4. Bischoff, J. E., Arruda, E. M., andGrosh, K. (2000): ‘Finite element modeling of human skin using an isotropic, nonlinear elastic constitutive model’,J. Biomech.,33, pp. 645–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dansereau, J., Côté, B., Labelle, H., andAubin, C.-É., (1992): ‘Measurement of forces generated by Boston brace in the treatment of scoliotic deformities’,J. Biomech.,25, p. 656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Delorme, S., Petit, Y., de Guise, J., Labelle, H., Aubin, C. É., andBansereau, J. (2003): ‘Assessment of the 3D reconstruction and high-resolution geometrical modeling of the human skeletal trunk from 2D radiographic images’,IEEE Tr. Biomed. Eng.,50, pp. 989–998Google Scholar
  7. Descrimes, J. L., Aubin, C. É., Skalli, W., Zeller, R., Dansereau, J., andLavaste, F. (1995): ‘Introduction des facettes articulaires dans une modélisation par éléments finis de la colonne vertébrale et du thorax scoliotique: aspects mécaniques’,Rachis,7, pp. 301–314Google Scholar
  8. Dietrich, M., Hedzior, K., andZagrajek, T. (1991): ‘A biomechanical model of the human spinal system’,Proc. Instn. Mech. Eng.,205, pp. 19–26Google Scholar
  9. Gignac, D., Aubin, C. E., Dansereau, J., andLabelle, H. (2000): ‘Optimization method for 3-D bracing correction of scoliosis using a finite element model’,Eur. Spine J.,9, pp. 185–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jiang, H., Raso, W., Hill, D., Durdle, N., andMoreau, M. (1992): ‘Interface pressure in the Boston brace treatment for scoliosis: a preliminary study’. Int. Symposium on 3D Scoliotic Deformities (Editions de l'Ecole Polytechnique, Montréal, and Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart), pp. 395–399Google Scholar
  11. Labelle, H., Dansereau, J., Bellefleur, C., andPoitras, B. (1996): ‘Three-dimensional effect of the Boston brace on the thoracic spine and the rib cage’,Spine,21, pp. 59–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mac-Thiong, J. M., Petit, Y., Delorme, S., Dansereau, J., Aubin, C. É., andLabelle, H. (2004): ‘Biomechanical evaluation of the Boston brace for the treatment of AIS: relationship between strap tension and brace pressure interface’.Spine,29, pp. 26–32Google Scholar
  13. Marras, W. S., andSommerich, C. M. (1991): ‘A three-dimensional motion model of loads on the lumbar spine: I. Model structure’,Hum. Factors,33, pp. 123–137Google Scholar
  14. Odermatt, D., Mathieu, P. A., Beauséjour, M., Labelle, H., andAubin, C. E. (2003): ‘Electromyographic study of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with the Boston brace’,J. Orthop. Res. 21, pp. 931–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ogilvie, J. (1994):Weinstein, S. L. (Ed.): ‘Spinal orthotics. An Overview, the Pediatric Spine: Principles and Practice’ (Raven Press Ltd., New York, USA, 1994), pp. 1787–1793Google Scholar
  16. Patwardan, A. G., Bunch, W. H., Meade, K. P., Vanderby, R. J., andKnight, G. W. (1986): ‘A biomechanical analog of curve progression and orthotic stabilization in idiopathic scoliosis’,J. Biomech.,19, pp. 103–117Google Scholar
  17. Périé, D., Sales de Gauzy, J., andHobatho, M. C. (2002): ‘Biomechanical evaluation of Cheneau-Toulouse-Munster brace in the treatment of scoliosis using optimisation approach and finite element method’,Med. Biol. Eng. Comput.,40, pp. 296–301Google Scholar
  18. Périé, D., Aubin, C. E., Petit, Y., Beauséjour, M., Dansereau, J. andLabelle, H. (2003): ‘Boston brace correction in idiopathic scoliosis: A biomechanical study’,Spine,28, pp. 1672–1677Google Scholar
  19. Petit, Y., Aubin, C. E., Dansereau, J., Gignac, D., Joncas, J., de Guise, J. A., andLabelle, H. (1998): ‘Effect of strap tension on the pressure generated by the Boston brace on idiopathic scoliosis patients: a preliminary study’,J. Biomech.,31, p., 175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stokes, I. A. (1994): ‘Three-dimensional terminology of spinal deformity. A report presented to the Scoliosis Research Society by the Scoliosis Research Society. Working Group on 3-D terminology of spinal deformity’,Spine,15 pp. 236–248Google Scholar
  21. Sundaram, S. H., andFeng, C. C. (1977): ‘Finite element analysis of the human thorax’,J. Biomech.,10, pp. 505–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ueyoshi, A., andShima, Y. (1985): ‘Studies on spinal braces, with special reference to the effects on increased abdominal pressure’,Int. Orthop.,9, pp. 255–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wynarsky, G. T., andSchultz, A. B. (1991): ‘Optimization of skeletal configuration: studies of scoliosis correction biomechanics’,J. Biomech.,24, pp. 721–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFMBE 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Périé
    • 1
    • 2
  • C. E. Aubin
    • 2
    • 3
  • M. Lacroix
    • 2
    • 3
  • Y. Lafon
    • 2
    • 3
  • H. Labelle
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of VermontBurlingtonUSA
  2. 2.Research CenterSainte-Justine HospitalMontréalCanada
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringEcole PolytechniqueMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations