Skip to main content
Log in

Characterisation of three-dimensional anatomic shapes using principal components: Application to the proximal tibia

  • Published:
Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of the research is to determine if principal component analysis (PCA) provides an efficient method to characterise the normative shape of the proximal tibia. Bone surface data, converted to analytical surface descriptions, are aligned, and an auto-associative memory matrix is generated. A limited subset of the matrix principal components is used to reconstruct the bone surfaces, and the reconstruction error is assessed. Surface reconstructions based on just six (of 1452) principal components have a mean root-mean-square (RMS) reconstruction error of 1.05% of the mean maximum radial distance at the tibial plateau. Surface reconstruction of bones not included in the auto-associative memory matrix have a mean RMS error of 2.90%. The first principal component represents the average shape of the sample population. Addition of subsequent principal components represents the shape variations most prevalent in the sample and can be visualised in a geometrically meaningful manner. PCA offers an efficient method to characterise the normative shape of the proximal tibia with a high degree of dimensionality reduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. A. (1995): ‘An introduction to neural networks’ (MIT Press, Cambridge)

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, P., andBerry, P. (1994): ‘Statistical methods in medical research’ (Blackwell Scientific, Boston)

    Google Scholar 

  • Belsole, R. J., Hilbelink, D. R., Llewellyn, J. A., Dale, M., Ogden, J. A. (1991): ‘Carpal orientation from computed reference axes’,J. Hand Surg. Am.,16, pp. 82–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunteman, G. H. (1989): ‘Principal components analysis’ (Sage, Newbury Park)

    Google Scholar 

  • Flury, B. (1988): ‘Common principal components and related multivariate models’ (John Wiley & Sons, Inc)

  • Hafner, B. J., Zachariah, S. G., andSanders, J. E. (1998): ‘Automated alignment of contour pairs: A hybrid approach with applications to prosthetics’. Proc. 1998 RESNA Annual Conf., Minneapolis, Minnesota, pp. 272–274

  • Hotelling, H. (1933): ‘Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components’,J. Educ. Psychol.,24, pp. 417–441, 498–520

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Isebrands, J. G., andCrow, T. R. (1975): ‘Introduction to uses and interpretation of principal component analysis in forest biology’ (Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture)

  • Kirby, M., andSirovich, L., (1990): ‘Application of the Karhunen-Loeve procedure for the characterization of human faces’,IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.,12, pp. 103–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroemer, K. H. E., Kroemer, H. B., andKroemer-Elbert, K. E. (1994): ‘Ergonomics: How to design for ease and efficiency’ (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs)

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Toole, A. J., Abdi, H., Deffenbacher, K. A., andValentin, D. (1993): ‘Low-dimensional representation of faces in higher dimensions of the face space’,J. Opt. Soc. Am. A,10, pp. 405–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostle, B., andMalone, L. C. (1988): ‘Statistics in research: basic concepts and techniques for research workers’ (Iowa State University Press), p. 536

  • Pearson, K. (1901): ‘On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space’,Phil. Mag., May 2, pp. 559–572

  • Pentland, A., Moghaddam, B., andStarner, T. (1994): ‘View-based and modular eigenspaces for face recognition’, Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. vis. pattern recognit., Seattle, Washington, pp. 84–91

  • Preisendorfer, R. W., andMobley, C. D. (1988): ‘Principal component analysis in meteorology and oceanography’ (Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc.)

  • Toga, A. W., andBanerjee, P. K. (1993): ‘Registration revisited’,J. Neurosci. Methods,48, pp. 1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, D. A., andIvanovic, M. (1994): ‘Correlative image registration’,Semin. Nucl. Med.,24, pp. 311–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Yehia, H., andTiede, M. (1997): ‘A parametric three-dimensional model of the vocal-tract based on MRI data’. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust. Speech Signal Processing, Munich, Germany, pp. 1619–1622

  • Zachariah, S. G., Sanders, J. E., andTurkiyyah, G. M. (1996): ‘Automated hexahedral mesh generation from biomedical image data: applications in limb prosthetics’,IEEE Trans. Rehab. Eng.,4, pp. 91–102

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. E. Sanders.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hafner, B.J., Zachariah, S.G. & Sanders, J.E. Characterisation of three-dimensional anatomic shapes using principal components: Application to the proximal tibia. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 38, 9–16 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02344682

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02344682

Keywords

Navigation