Advertisement

Journal of Plant Research

, Volume 108, Issue 4, pp 443–450 | Cite as

Dioecy in the endemic genusDendrocacalia (Compositae) on the Bonin (Ogasawara) Islands

  • Makoto Kato
  • Hidetoshi Nagamasu
Original Articles

Abstract

Dendrocacalia crepidifolia Nakai (Compositae, Senecioneae), the only species of this arboreal genus endemic to Haha Island in the Bonin Islands, was found to be dioecious. Male flowers differ from female ones in having a stunted style (style in female exserted from corolla and deeply bifurcating) and anthers filled with fertile pollen (anthers in the female lacking pollen). The size of the corolla and number of florets per head were similar between male and female flowers. The crown area of this arboreal species was also similar in male and female plants. The sex ratio was 0.55 male, not significantly different from 0.5. Both sexes produced nectar of similar sugar concentration (ca. 50%). The flowers are pollinated by feral honeybees (Apis mellifera), but they are thought to have been pollinated by small, lesshairy, endemic solitary bees before honeybees were introduced and subsequently became the dominant bee species on the island. The evolution of dioecy ofDendrocacalia on the island is thought to stem from the deleterious effects of inbreeding that are inherent in plants with geitonogamy. The increased geitonogamy on the island has resulted from increased woodiness (i.e., increased number of flowers per plant) and the original dependence on endemic bee pollinators, which are now endangered.

Key words

Bonin Islands Compositae Dendrocacalia Dioecy Feral honeybee 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker, H.G. 1959. Reproductive methods as factors in speciation in flowering plants. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology24: 177–191.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bawa, K.S. 1980. Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst.11: 15–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bawa, K.S. 1994. Pollinators of tropical dioecious angiosperms: A reassessment? No, not yet Amer. J. Bot.81: 456–460.Google Scholar
  4. Bawa, K.S. andOpler, P.A. 1975. Dioecism in tropical forest trees. Evolution29: 167–179.Google Scholar
  5. Bernhardt, P. 1987. A comparison of the diversity, density, and foraging behavior of bees and wasps on australianAcacia. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.74: 42–50.Google Scholar
  6. Bremer, K. 1994. Asteraceae: Cladistics and Classification. Timber press, Portland, Oregon.Google Scholar
  7. Carlquist, S. 1974. Island Biology. Columbia University Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  8. Charlesworth, B. andCharlesworth, D. 1978. A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. Am. Nat.112: 975–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cuddihy, LW. andStone, C.P. 1990. Alteration of native Hawaiian vegetation: effects of humans, their activities and introductions. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu, Hawaii.Google Scholar
  10. de Jong, T.J., Waser, N.M., Price, M.V. andRing, R.M. 1992. Plant size, geitonogamy and seed set inIpomopsis aggregata. Oecologia89: 310–315.Google Scholar
  11. de Jong, T.J., Waser, N.M. andL. Klinkhamer, P.G. 1993. Geitonogamy: the neglected side of selfing. Tr. Ecol. Evol.8: 321–325.Google Scholar
  12. Erdtman, G. 1960. The acetolysis method. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift54: 561–564.Google Scholar
  13. Frankie, G., Opler, P.A. andBawa, K.S. 1976. Foraging behaviour of solitary bees: Implications for outcrossing of a neotropical forest tree species. J. Ecol.62: 881–919.Google Scholar
  14. Funakoshi, M. 1990. Formation ofLeucaena glauca forests in the Bonin Islands. Ogasawara Kenkyû Nenpô14: 21–51. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  15. Galen, C., Gregory, T. andGalloway, L.F.. 1990. Costs of self-pollination in a self-incompatible plant,Polemonium viscosum. Amer. J. Bot.76: 1675–1680.Google Scholar
  16. Godley, E.J. 1975. Flora and vegetation.In G. Kuschel, ed., Biogeography and Ecology in New Zealand, Junk, The Haque, pp. 177–229.Google Scholar
  17. Helenurm, K. andGanders, F.R. 1985. Adaptive radiation and genetic differentiation in HawaiianBidens. Evolution39: 753–765.Google Scholar
  18. Hessing, M.B. 1988. Geitonogamous pollination and its consequences inGeranium caespitosum. Amer. J. Bot.75: 1324–1333.Google Scholar
  19. Hirashima, Y. 1989. A check List of Japanese Insects. Entomological Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture. Kyushu University.Google Scholar
  20. Howarth, F.G. andMull, W.P. 1992. Hawaiian Insects and Their Kin. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu, Hawaii.Google Scholar
  21. Ito, M. andOno, M. 1990. Allozyme diversity and the evolution ofCrepidiastrum (Compositae) on the Bonin (Ogasawara) Islands. Bot. Mag. Tokyo103: 449–459.Google Scholar
  22. Kato, M. 1992. Endangered bee fauna and its floral hosts in the Ogasawara Islands. Jap. J. Entomol.60: 487–494.Google Scholar
  23. Kawakubo, N. 1990. Dioecism of the genusCallicarpa (Verbenaceae) in the Bonin (Ogasawara) Islands. Bot. Mag. Tokyo103: 57–66.Google Scholar
  24. Knox, R.B., Kenrick, J., Bernhardt, P., Marginson, R., Beresford, G. andBaker, H.G. 1985. Extra-floral nectaries as adaptations for bird pollination inAcacia terminalis. Amer. J. Bot.72: 1185–1196.Google Scholar
  25. Messing, R.H. 1991. Status of beekeeping in the Hawaiian islands. Bee World72: 147–160.Google Scholar
  26. Michener, C.D. 1974. The Social Behavior of the Bees: A Comparative Study. The Belknap Press. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  27. Nagamasu, H. 1987. Notes onSymplocos lucida and related species in Japan. Acta Phytotax. Geobot.38: 283–291. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  28. Nakai, T. 1915. Plantae novae Japonicae et Koreanae IV. Bot. Mag. Tokyo29: 1–13.Google Scholar
  29. Ono, M. 1975. Chromosome numbers of some endemic species of the Bonin Islands I. Bot. Mag. Tokyo88: 323–328.Google Scholar
  30. Ono, M. 1985. Speciation and distribution ofPittosporum in the Bonin Islands,In H. Hara, ed., Evolution and Diversity in Plant and Communities. Academic Scientific Book, Tokyo, pp. 7–17.Google Scholar
  31. Park, O.W. 1933. Studies on the changes in nectar concentration produced by the honeybee,Apis mellifera. Part I. Changes which occur between the flower and the hive. Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station Research Bulletin151: 211–243.Google Scholar
  32. Perkins, R.C.L. 1901. Hymenoptera Aculeata. Fauna Hawaiiensis1: 1–115, Pls. 1–2.Google Scholar
  33. Renner, S.S. andFeil, J.P. 1993. Pollinators of tropical dioecious angiosperms. Amer. J. Bot.80: 1100–1107.Google Scholar
  34. Soejima, A., Nagamasu, H., Ito, M., andOno, M. 1994. Allozyme diversity and the evolution ofSymplocos (Symplocaceae) on the Bonin (Ogasawara) Islands. J. Plant Res.107: 221–227.Google Scholar
  35. Strickler, K. 1979. Specialization and foraging efficiency of solitary bees. Ecology60: 998–1009.Google Scholar
  36. Thomson, J.D. andBrunet, J. 1990. Hypotheses for the evolution of dioecy in seed plants. Tr. Ecol. Evol.5: 11–16.Google Scholar
  37. Waser, N.M. andPrice, M.V. 1991. Reproductive costs of self-pollination inIpomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae): are ovules usurped? Amer. J. Bot.78: 1036–1043.Google Scholar
  38. Webb, C.J. andKelly, D. 1993. The reproductive biology of the New Zealand flora. Tr. Ecol. Evol.8: 442–447.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Botanical Society of Japan 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Makoto Kato
    • 1
  • Hidetoshi Nagamasu
    • 1
  1. 1.Biological Laboratory, Yoshida CollegeKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations