Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 77, Issue 4, pp 688–722 | Cite as

Social costs of untreated opioid dependence

  • Ronald Wall
  • Jurgen Rehm
  • Benedikt Fischer
  • Bruna Brand's
  • Louis Gliksman
  • Jennifer Stewart
  • Wendy Medved
  • Joan Blake
Original Article

Abstract

Using cost-of-illness methodology applied to a comprehensive survey of 114 daily opiate users not currently in or seeking treatment for their addiction, we estimated the 1996 social costs of untreated opioid dependence in Toronto (Ontario, Canada). The survey collected data on social and demographic characteristics, drug use history, physical and mental health status, the use of health care and substance treatment services, drug use modality and sex-related risks of infectious diseases, sources of income, as well as criminality and involvement with the law enforcement system. The annual social cost generated by this sample, calculated at Canadian $5.086 million, is explained mostly by crime victimization (44.6%) and law enforcement (42.4%), followed by productivity losses (7.0%) and the utilization of health care (6.1%). Applying the $13,100 cost to the estimated 8,000 to 13,000 users and 2.456 million residents living in Toronto yields a range of social cost between $43 and $69 per capita.

Key Words

Cost of illness Illicit drugs Opioid dependence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Fischer B, Rehm J. The case for a heroin substitution treatment trial in Canada.Can J Public Health. 1997;88:367–370.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kendall P, Fischer B, Rehm J, Room R. Charting WHO goals for the year 2000: are we on track? Keynote address delivered at: 37th ICAA Congress; August 26, 1995; San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rehm J, Fischer B. Measuring harm: implications for alcohol epidemiology. In: Plant M, Single E, Stockwell T ed.Alcohol: Minimising the Harm? What Works? London: Free Association Books; 1997:248–261.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hodgson TA, Meiners MR. Cost-of-illness methodology: a guide to current practices and procedures.Milbank Memorial Fund Q/Health Soc. 1982;60:429–462.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Single E, Robson L, Xie X, Rehm J. The economic costs of alcohol, tobacco and illicit drugs in Canada, 1992.Addiction. 1998;93:983–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xie X, Rehm J, Single E, Robson L, Paul J. The economic costs of illicit drug use in Ontario, 1992.Health Econ [letter]. 1998;7:81–85.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Van Truong M, Williams B, Timoshenko G.Ontario Profile: Alcohol and Other Drugs, 1998. Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation; 1998.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Millar JS. A time for everything: changing attitudes and approaches to reducing substance abuse.Can Med Assoc J [editorial]. 1998;159:485–487.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Research Group on Drug Use.Drug Use in Toronto. Toronto, ON, Canada: Drug Prevention Centre, City of Toronto Department of Public Health Services; 1998.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    O'Flaherty B.Making Room: The Economics of Homelessness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1996.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Single E, Easton B, Collins D, Harwood H, Lapsley H, Maynard A, eds.International Guidelines for Estimating the Costs of Substance Abuse, Ottawa, ON, Canada: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse; 1996.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment.A Guidance Document for the Costing Process. Version 1.0. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment; 1996.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Coleman C, Moynihan J.Understanding Crime Data: Haunted by the Dark Figure. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press; 1992.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brantingham P, Easton ST.The Crime Bill: Who Pays and How Much? Victoria, BC, Canada: The Fraser Institute Critical Issues Bulletin; 1996.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cohen MA. Alcohol, drugs and crime: is “crime” really one-third of the problem? [commentary].Addiction. 1999;94:644–647.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harwood HJ, Fountain D, Livermore G.The Economic Costs of Alcohol and Drug Abuse in the United States, 1992. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health; 1998.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Deschenes EP, Anglin MD, Speckart G. Narcotics addiction: related criminal careers, social and economic costs.J Drug Issues. 1991;21:383–411.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Becker GS. Crime and punishment: an economic approach.J Political Econ. 1968;82: 169–217.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rajkumar AS, French MT. Drug abuse, crime costs, and the economic benefits of treatment.J Quant Criminol. 1997;13:291–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brochu S. Estimating the costs of drug-related crime. Available at:http://www.ccsa.ca/brochu.htm. Accessed May 5, 1998.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cohen MA. A note on the cost of crime to victims.Urban Stud. 1990;27:139–146.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gillespie RW. Heroin addiction, crime and economic cost: a critical analysis.J Criminal Justice. 1978;6:305–313.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Harwood HJ. Societal costs of heroin addiction. In: National Institutes of Health.NIH Consensus Development Conference on Effective Medical Treatment of Heroin Addiction, Bethesda, Maryland, November 17–19, 1997. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health; 1998;53–56.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Frei A, Greiner AR, Mehnert A, Dinkel R. Socioeconomic evaluation of heroin maintenance treatment. In: Gutzwiller F, Steffen T, eds.Cost Benefit Analysis of Heroin Maintenance Treatment. Basel, Switzerland: Karger Verlag; 2000;37–130.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Healey A, Knapp M, Astin J, Gossop M, Marsden J, Stewart D, et al. Economic burden of drug dependency: social costs incurred by drug users at intake to the National Treatment Outcome Research Study.Br J Psychiatry. 1998;173:160–165.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Harwood HJ, Fountain D, Fountain G. Economic cost of alcohol and drug abuse in the United States, 1992 [report].Addiction. 1999;94:631–635.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Reuter P. Are calculations of the economic costs of drug abuse either possible or useful? [commentary].Addiction. 1999;94:635–638.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kleiman MAR. “Economic cost” measurements, damage minimization and drug abuse control policy [commentary].Addiction. 1999;94:638–641.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kopp P. Economic costs calculations and drug policy evaluation [commentary].Addiction. 1999;94:641–644.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Goeree R, O'Brien BJ, Blackhouse G, Agro K, Goering P.. The valuation of productivity costs due to premature mortality: a comparison of the human-captial and friction-cost methods for schizophrenia.Can J Psychiatry. 1999;44:455–463.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fischer B, Medved W, Gliksman L, Rehm J. Illicit opiates in Toronto: a profile of current users.Addiction Res. 1999;7:377–415.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dunn J, Ferri C. Epidemiological methods for research with drug misusers: review of methods for studying prevalence and morbidity.Rev Saude Publica. 1999;33:206–215.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Spreen M, Zwaagstra R. Personal network sampling, out degree analysis and multilevel analysis: introducing the network concept on studies of hidden population.Int Sociol. 1994;9:475–491.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Watters J, Biernacki P. Targeted sampling: options for the study of hidden populations.Soc Probl. 1989;36:416–430.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Howell DC,Statistical Methods for Psychology. 3rd ed. Boston, MA: PWS-Kent; 1992.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bolton S.Pharmaceutical Statistics: Practical and Clinical Applications. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker; 1990.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Altman DG, Gore SS, Gardner MJ, Pocock SJ. Statistical guidelines for contributors to medical journals. In: Altman DG, Machin D, Bryant TN, Gardner MJ, eds.Statistics with Confidence. 2nd ed. London: BMJ Books; 2000:171–201.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jacobs P, Bachynsky J.An Alberta Standard Cost List for Health Economics Evaluations. Edmonton, AB, Canada: Institute of Pharmaco-Economics; 1997. Working Paper 97–5.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jacobs P, Shanahan M, Roos NP, Farnworth M.Cost List for Manitoba Health Services. Winnipeg, MB, Canada: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy and Evaluation; 1999.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wall R, DeCoster C, Roos N.Estimating per Diem Costs for Manitoba Hospitals: a First Step. Winnipeg, MB, Canada: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy and Evaluation; 1994.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pope D, Fernandes CMB, Bouthillette F, Etherington J. Frequent users of the emergency department: a program to improve care and reduce visits.Can Med Assoc J. 2000;162: 1017–1020.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Stewart J, Rehm J, Fischer B, et al.The Social Costs of Untreated Opiate Use. Toronto, ON, Canada: Addiction Research Foundation; 1997 Research. Documents Series 137.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Nestman LJ.Management Control and Funding Systems: for Canadian Health Service Eexecutives. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Canadian College of Health Service Executives; 1989.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Krahn MD, Berka C, Langlois P, Detsky AS. Direct and indirect costs of asthma in Canada, 1990.Can Med Assoc J. 1996;154:821–831.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rush B, Kim C, Schmidt G.A Manual for Cost Analysis of Substance Abuse Treatment. London, ON, Canada: Addiction Research Foundation; 1998.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ontario Ministry of Health.Schedule of Benefits: Physician Services Under the Health Insurance Act. Toronto, ON, Canada: Ontario Ministry of Health Physician Services Branch; 1992.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ontario Ministry of Health.Ontario Drug Benefit Formulary/Comparative Drug Index. Toronto, ON, Canada: Ontario Ministry of Health Drug Branch; 1996.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Cooper JR, Czechowicz DJ, Petersen RC, Molinari SP. Prescription drug diversion control and medical practice.JAMA. 1992;268:1306–1310.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sajan A, Corneil T, Grzybowski S. The street value of prescription drugs.Can Med Assoc J. 1998;159:139–142.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Goldman B. The news on the street: prescription drugs on the black market.Can Med Assoc J [editorial]. 1998;159:149–150.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Johnson BD, Goldstein PJ, Preble E et al.Taking Care of Business: The Economics of Crime by Heroin Abusers. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books; 1985.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Fernandez H.Heroin. Center City, MN: Hazelden; 1998.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wolff L, Reingold B.Drug Use and Crime. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics; 1994 Statistics Canada, Juristat, Catalogue 85–102, Vol. 14, No. 6.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Platt JJ.Heroin Addiction: Theory, Research, and Treatment. Volume 2: The Addict, the Treatment Process, and Social Control. Malabar, FL: Krieger; 1995.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Bell J, Mattick R, Hay A, Chan J, Hall W. Methadone maintenance and drug-related crime.J Subst Abuse. 1997;9:15–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ball JC, Ross A:The Effectiveness of Methadone Maintenance Treatment: Patients, Programs, Services, and Outcome. New York, NY: Springer Verlag; 1991.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Grimes C.Adult Criminal Court Statistics, 1995–1996 Ottawa, ON, Canada: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics; 1997. Statistics Canada, Juristat, Catalogue 85-002-XPE, Vol. 17, No. 6.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Swol K.Crime and Police Resources in Canadian Municipalities, 1996. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics; 1997. Statistics Canada Catalogue 85-223-XPE.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Foran T.Government Spending on Adult Correctional Services. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics; 1996. Statistics Canada, Juristat, Catalogue 85-002, Vol. 16, No. 3.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Reed M, Morrison D.Adult Correctional Services Statistics, 1995–96. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Canadian Centre for Justice; 1997. Statistics Canada, Juristat, Catalogue 85-002, Vol. 17, No. 4.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Wright C.Risk of Personal and Household Victimization: Canada, 1993. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics; 1995. Statistics Canada, Juristat, Catalogue 85-002, Vol. 15, No. 2.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Criminal Injuries Compensation Board.Twenty-fourth Annual Report. Toronto, ON, Canada: Criminal Injuries Compensation Board: 1996.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    McElrath K, Chitwood DD, Comerford M. Crime victimization among injection drug users.J Drug Issues. 1997;27:771–783.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Himelfarb A. Cost of crime to victims: preliminary findings of the Canadian urban victimization survey.Impact. 1984;2:36–49.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Hanvelt RA, Ruedy NS, Hogg RS, et al. Indirect costs of HIV/AIDS mortality in Canada.AIDS. 1994;8:F7-F11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Rehm J, Ialomiteaunu D, Walsh G, Adlaf E, Single E.The Quantification of Mortality Caused by Illicit Drugs in Canada, 1992. Toronto, ON, Canada: Addiction Research Foundation; 1996.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Rettig R, Yarmolinsky A.Federal Regulation of Methadone Treatment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1995.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Faupel C, Klockars C. Drugs-crime connections: elaborations from the life histories of hard-core heroin addicts.Soc Probl. 1987;34:54–68.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Strathdee SA, Patrick DM, Currie SL, et al. Needle exchange is not enough: lessons from the Vancouver injecting drug use study.AIDS. 1997;11:59–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Bruneau J, Lamothe F, Franco E, et al. High rates of HIV infection among injection drug users participating in needle exchange programs in Montreal: results of a cohort study.Am J Epidemiol. 1997;146:994–1002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Fischer B. Opiate addiction treatment, research and policy in Canada—past, present and future issues. In: Rehs-Middel M, Haemmig R, Matthias R, Matthias L, eds.Heroin-Assisted Treatment for Dependent Drug Users: State of the Art and New Research Perspectives, Scientific Findings and Political Perspectives. Berne, Switzerland: University of Berne; in press.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Kilias M, Rabasa J.Schlussbericht zu den Auswirkungen der Verschreibung von Betaeubungsmitteln auf die Delinquenz von Drogenabhaengigen. Lausanne, Switzerland: Institut de police scientifique et de criminologie; 1997.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Kilias M, Rabasa J. Less crime in the cities through heroin prescription? Preliminary results from the evaluation of the Swiss Heroin Prescription projects.Howard J Criminal Justice. 1997;36:424–429.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Kilias M, Rabasa J. Auswirkungen der Heroin-Verschreibung auf die Delinquenz von Drogenabhaengiger.Monatsschrift fuer Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform. 1998;81: 1–16.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Kilias M, Rabasa J. Does heroin prescription reduce crime? Results from the evaluation of the Swiss Heroin Prescription projects.Stud Crime Crime Prev. 1998;7:127–133.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Drake S. Self-report among injecting drug users: a review.Drug Alcohol Depend. 1998; 51:253–263.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Des Jarlais DC. Validity of self-reported data, scientific methods and drug policy [commentary].Drug Alcohol Depend. 1998;51:265–266.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Bell J. Self report among injecting drug users [commentary].Drug Alcohol Depend. 1998; 51:267–268.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Finch E, Strang J. Reliability and validity of self-report: on the importance of considering context [commentary].Drug Alcohol Depend. 1998;51:269PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Johnson ME, Fisher DG, Reynolds G. Reliability of drug users' self-report of economic variables.Addict Res. 1999;7:227–238.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Chaiken J, Chaiken M.Varieties of Criminal Behavior. Santa Monica, CA: RAND; 1982. Publication R-2814-ICJ.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Inciardi JA. Heroin use and street crime.Crime Delinquency. 1979;25:335–346.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Inciardi JA.Criminal Justice. Orlando, FL: Academic; 1984.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    French MT, McGeary KA, Chitwood DD, McCoy CB. Chronic illicit drug use, health services utilization and the cost of medical care.Soc Sci Med. 2000;50:1703–1713.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Maynard C, Cox GB, Krupski A, Stark D. Utilization of services by persons discharged from involuntary chemical dependency treatment.J Addict Dis. 2000;19;83–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Powis B, Strang J, Griffiths P, et al. Self-reported overdose among injecting drug users in London: extent and nature of the problem.Addiction. 1999;94:471–478.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Dunlop S, Coyte PC, McIsaac W. Socio-economic status and the utilisation of physicians services: results from the Canadian National Population Health Survey.Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:123–133.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Sanchez-Carbonell X, Seus L. Ten-year survival analysis of a cohort of heroin addicts in Catalonia: the EMETYST project [research report].Addiction. 2000;95:941–948.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Fischer B, Kendall P, Rehm J, Room R. Charting WHO goals for licit and illicit drugs for the year 2000: are we on track?Public Health. 1997;111:271–277.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Giffen J, Endicott S, Lambert S.Panic and Indifference—the Politics of Canada's Drug Laws. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse; 1991.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Musto DF:The American Disease: Origins of Narcotic Control. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1987.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    National Institute on Drug Abuse.Methadone Maintenance Treatment: Translating Research into Policy. Washington, DC: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 1995.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    National Institute on Health National Consensus Development Panel on Effective Medical Treatment of Opiate Addiction. Effective medical treatment of opiate addiction.JAMA. 1998;280:1936–1943.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Ralston G, Wilson P. Methadone programs: the cost and benefits to society.Pharmaco-Economics. 1997;10:321–326.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Brands J, Brands B, Marsh DC. The expansion of methadone prescribing in Ontario, 1996–1997.Addict Res. In press.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Drake RE, Mercer-McFadden C, Mueser KT, McHugo GJ, Bond GR. Review of integrated mental health an substance abuse treatment for patients with dual disorders.Schizophr Bull. 1998;24:589–608.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald Wall
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Jurgen Rehm
    • 1
    • 4
    • 5
  • Benedikt Fischer
    • 1
    • 5
    • 6
  • Bruna Brand's
    • 2
    • 7
  • Louis Gliksman
    • 1
    • 8
  • Jennifer Stewart
    • 9
  • Wendy Medved
    • 10
    • 11
  • Joan Blake
    • 2
  1. 1.Social, Prevention, and Health Policy Research DepartmentCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthLondonCandada
  2. 2.Clinical Research DepartmentCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthLondonCanada
  3. 3.Health Systems Research and Consulting UnitCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthLondonCanada
  4. 4.Department of Public Health SciencesUniversity of Applied ScienceHamburg
  5. 5.Department of Public Health SciencesUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  6. 6.Department of CriminologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  7. 7.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  8. 8.Department of Social ScienceThe University of Western Ontario (Brescia College)TorontoCanada
  9. 9.Department of EconomicsNational University of Ireland(Galway)
  10. 10.Family Healthcare Research Centre, Department of Family MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  11. 11.Ontario Cancer InstitutePrincess Margaret HospitalTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations