Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine

, Volume 56, Issue 5, pp 1203–1205 | Cite as

The problem of the interaction of the cerebellum and thyroid gland

  • E. A. Moiseev
  • R. A. Proshina
  • M. M. Reidler


It was shown that after thyroidectomy rabbits showed regular changes in the cerebellar cortex in which the number of pyknomorphic forms of Purkinje cells increased by 1.7–2 times. In the light of other relevant reports it has been proposed that these changes are related to a humoral connection between the cerebellum and the thyroid gland.


Internal Medicine Purkinje Cell Thyroid Gland Cerebellar Cortex Regular Change 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    S. É. Belen'kaya and A. M. Zimkina, Abstracts of reports at the third conference on physiological problems, Moscow-Leningrad (1938), p. 78.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. M. Zimkina, Zh. obshchei biol. (1944),5, No. 5, p. 304.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. M. Zimkina and E. A. Stolyarskaya, Transactions of the I. P. Pavlov Institute of Physiology, AN SSSR, Moscow-Leningrad (1945),1, p. 185.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. S. Karagedova and A. A. Loginov, Transactions of the Azerbaidzhan University, Biological series (1954), No. 6, p. 189.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. Knonova, BMÉ, Moscow (1931),18, p. 560.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. S. Nukhina, Abstracts of reports of the 8th conference on physiological problems, Moscow-Leningrad (1940), p. 44.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. I. Saprokhin, Abstracts of reports on the 8th conference on physiological problems, Moscow-Leningrad, p. 54.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. V. Tutaev and Z. A. Makarova, Probl. éndokrinol. (1940),5, No. 4, p. 45.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. V. Tutaev and M. A. Isichenko, Byull. éksper. biol. (1949),28, No. 10, p. 299.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Mosinger, C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) (1951),233, p. 982.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Idem C. R. Soc. Biol. (1956),150, p. 1588.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. Seite, Ibid. (1955),149, p. 2005.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Idem, Arch. Anat. micro. Morph. exp. (1955),44, p. 89; (1956),45, p. 261.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    T. Senise, Phyzhiol. Zh. SSSR (1936),21, No. 5-6, p. 730.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    W. Shanklin, M. Issidorides, and T. Massar, J. comp. Neurol. (1957),107, p. 315.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Stahl, C. R. Soc. Biol. (1956),150, p. 217.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    O. Thomas, J. comp. Neurol. (1951),95, p. 73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Consultants Bureau 1963

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. A. Moiseev
    • 1
  • R. A. Proshina
    • 1
  • M. M. Reidler
    • 1
  1. 1.I. M. Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary PhysiologyAN SSSRLeningrad

Personalised recommendations