European Radiology

, Volume 6, Supplement 2, pp S13–S15 | Cite as

Haemodynamic and rheological effects of contrast media: the role of viscosity and osmolality

  • N. D. Pugh
Article

Abstract

All currently available iodinated contrast media (CM) produce some form of haemodynamic or rheological change when injected. These effects are thought to be due primarily to the osmolity and viscosity of the CM. The new hexa-iodinated contrast agent Visipaque has the advantage of being iso-osmotic with blood at all clinically relevant concentrations, but is more viscous than the monomers at equivalent iodine concentration.

The purpose of this review is to discuss the relative importance of osmolality and viscosity in the clinical situation.

Key words

X-ray contrast media Visipaque osmolality viscosity 

References

  1. 1.
    Almén T (1989) Relations between chemcial structure, animal toxicity and clinical adverse effects of contrast media. In: Enge I, Edgren J (ed) Patient safety and adverse events in contrast medium examinations. Excerpta Medica International Congress Series 816. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, pp 25–45Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Heglund IF, Blazak W, Michelet AA, Furuhama K, Holtz E (1995) Pre clinical pharmacokinetics and general toxicology of iodixanol. Acta Radiol (in press)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Speck U (1995) Pre clinical findings with iotrolan: a short review. Eur Radiol 5: s8-sl3Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hagen B, Wenzel-Hora BI (1989) Initial experiences with a non-ionic, dimeric contrast medium (lotrolan) in direct and indirect arteriography: a randomised, intra-individual double blind study in 60 patients. In: Taenzer V, Wende S (ed) Recent developments in non-ionic contrast media. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. pp 54–60Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grynne BH, Bolstad B, Borch KW Nossen JØ (1995) Main results from the first comparative clinical studies on VISIPAQUE®. Acta Radiol (in press)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Padayachee TS, Reidy JF, King DH, Reeves M, Gosling RG (1983) Femoral artery blood flow and pain during lumbar aortography: comparison of ionic and non-ionic contrast media. Clin Radiol 34: 79–85CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nauret C, Langer M, Mützel W (1989) Hemorrheologic effects of iotrolan after intra-arterial injection in rabbits: comparison with other types of contrast media. In: Taenzer V Wende S (ed) Recent developments in non-ionic contrast media. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. pp40–45Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pugh ND, Sissons GRJ, Ruttley MST, Berg KJ, Nossen JØ and Eide H (1993) Iodixanol in femoral arteriography (Phase III). A comparative double-blind parallel trial between iodixanol and iopromide. Clin Radiol 47: 96–99PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rasmussen F (Personal communication)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smedby Ö (1992) Viscosity of some contemporary contrast media before and after mixing with whole blood. Acta Radiol 17: 600–605Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pugh ND, Hutcheson IR, Edwards DH, Nossen JØ, Karlsson JOG, Griffith TM (1995) Angiographic contrast media relax isolated rabbit aorta through an endothelium-independent mechanism that may not depend on the presence of the iodine atom. Br J Radiol 68: 23–26PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Klopp R, Niemer W, Schippel W, Krause W (1995) Changes in the microcirculation of the intact rat heart after iodinated and gadolinium containing contrast media. Invest Radiol 30: 69–74PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. D. Pugh
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Medical Physics & BioengineeringUniversity Hospital of WalesHeath ParkUK

Personalised recommendations