Skip to main content
Log in

Book reviews

  • Published:
Journal of Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Amiel, Y., Creedy, J., and Hurn, S. (1999): “Measuring Attitudes toward Inequality.”Scandinavian Journal of Economics 101: 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballano, C., and Ruiz-Castillo, J. (1993): “Searching by Questionnaire for the Meaning of Income Inequality.”Revista Española de Economía 10: 233–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gakidou, E., Murray, C., and Frenk, J. (1999): “A Framework for Measuring Health Inequality.” GPE Discussion paper no. 5, World Health Organization, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, E., and Seidl, C. (1994a): “Acceptance of Distributional Axioms: Experimental Findings.” InModels and Measurement of Welfare and Inequality, edited by W. Eichhorn. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1994b): “Perceptional Inequality and Preferential Judgements: an Empirical Examination of Distributional Judgements.”Public Choice 19: 61–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. (1953): “Cardinal Utility in Economics and in the Theory of Risk-taking.”Journal of Political Economy 61: 309–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolm, S.-C. (1966a): “The Optimal Production of Social Justice.” International Economic Association in Public Economics, Proceedings, Biarritz. Reprinted inEconomie publique, edited by H. Guitton and J. Margolis. Paris: CNRS 1968; andPublic Economics, edited by H. Guitton and J. Margolis. London: Macmillan 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1996b):Les choix financiers et monétaires. Paris: Dunod.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1971):Justice et equité. Paris: CEPREMAP. Reprint Paris: CNRS 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1976): “Unequal Inequalities.” I:Journal of Economic Theory 12: 416–442; II:Journal of Economic Theory 13: 82–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • (1996a)Modern Theories of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1996b):Intermediate Measures of Inequality. Paris: CGPC.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1998a): “Chance and Justice: Social Policy and the Harsanyi-Vickrey-Rawls Problem.”European Economic Review 42: 1393–1416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • (1998b):Justice and Equity (English translation of Kolm, 1971). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1999): “Rational Foundations of Income Inequality Measurement.” InHandbook of Income Inequality Measurement, edited by J. Silber. Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • (2000): “Health and Justice.” Discussion paper, World Health Organization, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971):Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schokkaert, E., and Capeau, B. (1991) “Interindividual Differences in Opinions about Distributive Justice.”Kyklos 44: 325–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schokkaert, E., and Lagrou, L. (1983): “An Empirical Approach to Distributive Justice.”Journal of Public Economics 21: 33–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schokkaert, E., and Overlaet, B. (1989): “Moral Intuitions and Economic Models of Distributive Justice.”Social Choice and Welfare 6: 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temkin, L. (1993):Inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

References

  • Alonso, W. (1964):Location and Land Use: Toward a General Theory of Land Rent. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumais, G., Ellison, G., and Glaeser, E. (1997): “Industrial Concentration as a Dynamic Process.” NBER Working Paper no. 6270, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolko, J. D. (2000): “Can I Get Some Service Here? Information Technology, Service Industries, and the Future of Cities.” Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, Boston, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. R. (1991): “Increasing Returns and Economic Geography.”Journal of Political Economy 99: 483–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. R., and Livas, R. E. (1992): “Trade Policy and the Third World Metropolis.”Journal of Development Economics 49: 137–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (1890):Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muth, R. F. (1969):Cities and Housing: the Spatial Pattern of Urban Residential Land Use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

References

  • Gordon, D. M. (1994): “Bosses of Different Stripes: a Cross-national Perspective on Monitoring and Supervision.”American Economic Review 84: 375–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1996).Fat and Mean: the Corporate Squeeze of Working Americans and the Myth of Managerial Downsizing. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. M., and Helpman, E. (1991):Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kolm, S.C., Glennerster, H., Oates, W.E. et al. Book reviews. Zeitschr. f. Nationalökonomie 73, 96–123 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02339583

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02339583

Navigation