Relationships between transposable elements based upon the integrase-transposase domains: Is there a common ancestor?
- 111 Downloads
The integrase domain of RNA-mediated elements (class I) and the transposase domain of DNA-mediated transposable elements (class II) were compared. A number of elements contain the DDE signature, which plays an important role in their integration. The possible relationships betweenmariner-Tc1 andIS elements, retrotransposons, and retroviruses were analyzed from an alignment of this region. Themariner-Tc1 superfamily, and LTR retrotransposons and retroviruses were found to be monophyletic groups. However, theIS elements of bacteria were found in several groups. These results were used to propose an evolutionary history that suggests a common ancestor for some integrases and transposases.
Key wordsTransposable elements Evolution Horizontal transfers and alternative hypotheses
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Cummings MP (1994) Transmission patterns of eukaryotic transposable elements: arguments for and against horizontal transfer. TREE 9:141–145Google Scholar
- Felsenstein J (1993) PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.5.c. University of Washington, SeattleGoogle Scholar
- Ferat JL, LeGouar M, Michel F (1994) Multiple group II self-splicing introns in mobile DNA fromEscherichia coli. CR Acad Sci, Life Sciences 317:141–148Google Scholar
- Finnegan DJ (1989) TheI factor andI-R hybrid dysgenesis inDrosophila melanogaster. In: Berg DE, Howe MM (eds) Mobile DNA. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC, pp 503–517Google Scholar
- Galas DJ, Chandler M (1989) Bacterial insertion sequences. In: Berg DE, Howe MM (eds) Mobile DNA. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, pp 109–162Google Scholar
- Genetic Computer Group (1991) Program manual for the GCG package, version 7. Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
- George DG, Hunt LT, Barker WC (1988) Current methods in sequence comparison and analysis. In: Schlesinger DH (ed) Macromolecular sequencing and synthesis. Alan R Liss, New York, pp 127–149Google Scholar
- Kidwell MG (1993) Lateral transfer in natural populations of eukaryotes. Ann Rev Genet 27:645–662Google Scholar
- Maruyama K, Hard DL (1991a) Evolution of the transposable elementmariner inDrosophila species. Genetics 128:319–329Google Scholar
- McDonald JF (1992) Transposable element and evolution. Special issue of Genetica 86Google Scholar
- Robertson HM (1995) Themariner-Tc1 superfamily of transposons in animals. J Insect Physiol (in press)Google Scholar
- Swofford (1993) Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. Version 3.1.1. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Warren WD, Atkinson PW, O'Brochta DA (1994) TheHermes transposable element from house fly,Musca domestica, is a short inverted repeat-type element of thehobo, Ac andTam3 (hAT) element family. Genet Res Camb 64:87–97Google Scholar