Abstract
Vignettes describing a case in which a battered woman killed her husband were presented to college students. Independent variables were the presence or absence of verbal aggression by the woman toward her husband before the final beating, the woman's reputation and social desirability as a wife and mother, and whether or not a weapon was present when the battering husband threatened the woman before she killed him. After reading a vignette, subjects (N=413) selected a verdict, reported what influenced their verdicts, and completed attitudinal measures on sex-role attitudes, attitudes toward wife-beating, and “just world” attitudes. The presence of verbal aggression by the woman increased the odds of subjects choosing a guilty verdict by 1.71 times compared to the absence of verbal aggression. A defendant characterized as a “bad” wife/mother or a dysfunctional wife/mother was, respectively, 6.24 and 2.49 times more likely to be found guilty rather than not guilty by reason of self-defense (NGRSD) than the “good” wife/mother. Use of a weapon by the husband did not significantly increase the number of NGRSD verdicts over conditions in which no weapon was present. Neither subjects' attitudes nor demographics appeared to be related to their choice of verdicts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aronson, E., Brewer, M., and Carlsmith, J. M. (1985). Experimentation in social psychology. In Lindzey, G., and Aronson, E. (eds.),Handbook of Social Psychology (third edition), Random House, New York, Vol. 1, pp. 441–486.
Aubrey, M., and Ewing, C. P. (1989). Student and voter subjects: Differences in attitudes toward battered women.J. Interpers. Viol. 4: 289–297.
Crowne, D. B., and Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.J. Consult. Psychol. 24: 349–354.
Dodge, M., and Greene, E. (1991). Juror and expert conceptions of battered women.Viol. Vict. 6: 271–282.
Dwyer, J. H. (1983).Statistical Models for the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Oxford University Press, New York.
Ewing, C. P. (1987).Battered Women Who Kill, Lexington, Toronto.
Ewing, C. P., and Aubrey, M. (1987). Battered women and public opinion: Some realities about the myths.J. Fam. Viol. 2: 257–264.
Finkel, N. J. and Handel, S. F. (1988). Jurors and insanity: Do test instructions instruct?Forensic Rep. 1: 65–79.
Finkel, N. J., and Handel, S. F. (1989). How jurors construe “insanity”.Law Hum. Behav. 13: 41–59.
Fulero, M., & Finkel, N.J. (1991). Barring ultimate issue testimony: An “insane” rule?Law Hum. Behav. 15: 495–507.
Fiora-Gormally, N. (1978). Battered women who kill: Double standard out of court, single standard in?Law Hum. Behav. 2: 133–165.
Fiske, S. T., and Taylor, S. E. (1984).Social Cognition, Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., Reading, MA.
Follingstad, D. R., Polek, D. S., Hause, E. S., Deaton, L. H., Bulger, M. W., and Conway, Z. D. (1989). Factors predicting verdicts in cases where battered women kill their husbands.Law Hum. Behav. 13: 253–269.
Gillespie, C. K. (1989).Justifiable Homicide, Ohio State University Press, Columbus, OH.
Greene, E., Raitz, A., and Lindblad, H. (1989). Jurors' knowledge of battered women.J. Fam. Viol. 4: 105–125.
Heider, F. (1958).The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations, Wiley, New York.
Hinkle, A. L., Smeltzer, D. J., Allen, C. A., and King, G. D. (1983). The judgment of college students and jurors concerning sanity and guilt of an alleged murderer.J. Social Psychol. 120: 253–257.
Jenkins, P., and Davidson, B. (1990). Battered women in the criminal justice system: An analysis of gender stereotypes.Behav. Sci. Law 8: 161–170.
Kalmuss, D. (1979). The attribution of responsibility in a wife-abuse context.Victimol. Internat. J. 4: 284–291.
Kasian, M., Spanos, N. P., Terrance, C. A., and Peebles, S. (1993). Battered women who kill: Jury simulation and legal defenses.Law Hum. Behav. 17: 289–312.
MacCoun, R. J., and Kerr, N. L. (1988). Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: Jurors' bias for leniency.J. Personal. Social Psychol. 54: 21–33.
Roberts, C. F., and Golding, S. L. (1991). The social construction of criminal responsibility and insanity.Law Hum. Behav. 15: 349–376.
Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 10). Academic Press, New York.
Rubin, Z., and Peplau, L. A. (1975). Who believes in a just world?J. Social Issues 31: 65–89.
Saunders, D. B., Lynch, A. B., Grayson, M., and Linz, D. (1987). The Inventory of Beliefs about Wife Beating: The construction and initial validation of a measure of beliefs and attitudes.Viol. Vict. 2: 39–57.
Schneider, E. M., and Jordan, S. B. (1981). Representation of women who defend themselves in response to physical or sexual assault. In Bochnak, E. (ed.),Self Defense Cases: Theory and Practice, Michie Co. Law Pubs., Charlottesville, VA.
Schuller, R. A. (1992). The impact of battered woman syndrome evidence on jury decision processes.Law Hum. Behav. 16: 597–620.
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., and Stapp, J. (1973) A short version of the Attitudes toward Women Scale (AWS).Bull. Psychonom. Soc. 2: 219–220.
Walker, L. E. (1979)The Battered Woman, Harper & Row, New York.
Walker, L. E. (1984).The Battered Woman Syndrome, Springer, New York.
Wolfgang, M. (1975).Patterns in Criminal Homicide, Patterson Smith, Montclair, NJ.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Follingstad, D.R., Brondino, M.J. & Kleinfelter, K.J. Reputation and behavior of battered women who kill their partners: Do these variables negate self-defense?. J Fam Viol 11, 251–267 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02336944
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02336944