Advertisement

Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 191–203 | Cite as

Observational experiences of intrapersonal conflict and teenage victimization: A comparative study among spouses and cohabitors

  • Nicky Ali Jackson
Article

Abstract

This study drew from the National Family Violence Resurvey of 1985 provided by Straus and Gelles. Five thousand one hundred fifty nine married and cohabiting couples were asked about violent experiences and observations in their family of orientation. These experiences were categorized by the degree of severity as well as its frequency. Intrafamilial conflict impacts on behavior in intimate relationships. The status of the relationship also contributes to the vulnerability towards victimization. Specifically, cohabitors were more likely to engage infuture violentrelationships than spouses given similar patterns of teenage victimization and observation. One explanation for the variation may include anticipation of nonfamilial violence over familial violence. Society fears violence at the hands of a stranger more so than a family member. This affects the greater acceptability to engage in violence with a partner who remains nonfamilial. Past studies have addressed the cycle of violence theory in explaining predictability. Nevertheless, this study initiates the comparison of unique populations within intergenerational transfer research. It proposes that more research needs to be conducted to better understand variation patterns among various victim populations. In other words, why some groups are more vulnerable to victimization and perpetration given similar background experiences should be explored.

Key Words

intraparental conflict teenage victimization cohabitors 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bandura, A. (1973).Agression: A Social Learning Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
  2. Deal, J. E., and Wampler, K.S. (1986). Dating Violence: The primary of previous experiences.J. Social Pers. Relat., 3: 457–471.Google Scholar
  3. Dobash, R. E., and Dobash, R. P. (1978). Wives: The appropriate victims of marital violence.Victimology, 2: 426–442.Google Scholar
  4. Fagan, J. A., Stewart, D. K., and Hansen, K. V. (1983). Violent men or violent husbands? Background factors and situational correlates. In Finkelhor (ed.),The Dark Side of Families: Current Family, Sage, Newbury Park.Google Scholar
  5. Finkelhor, D. (1983).The Dark Side of Families: Current Family Research, Sage, Newbury Park.Google Scholar
  6. Gelles, R. J., and Straus, M. A. (1988).Intimate Violence: The Causes and Consequences of Abuse in the American Family. Simon and Schuster, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Gelles, R. J. (1987).Family Violence, Sage, Newbury Park.Google Scholar
  8. Gelles, F. J., and Cornell, C. P. (1983). Toward a theory of intrafamily violence. In Finkelhor (ed.),The Dark Sides of Families: Current Family Research, Current Family Research, Newbury Park, Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Gelles, R. J., and Cornell, C. P. (1990).Intimate Violence in Families. Sage, Newbury Park.Google Scholar
  10. Gwartney-Gibbs, P. A., Stockard, J., and Bohmer, S. (1987). Learning courtship aggression: The influence of parents, peers and personal experiences.Fam. Relat. 36: 276–282.Google Scholar
  11. Hotaling, G. T., and Straus, M. A. (1980). Culture, social organization and irony in the study of family violence. In Straus and Hotaling (eds.),The Social Causes of Husband-Wife Violence, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  12. Lane, K. E. and Gwartney-Gibbs, P. A. (1985). Violence in the context of dating and sex.J. Fam. Issues 6: 45–59.Google Scholar
  13. Lincoln, A. J., and Straus, M. A. (1985).Crime and the Family, Charles C Thomas, Springfield.Google Scholar
  14. Lystad, M. (ed.) (1986).Violence in the Home: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Brunner/Mazzel, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Pagelow, M. D. (1984).Woman Battering: Victims and Their Experiences, Sage, Beverly Hills.Google Scholar
  16. Pirog-Good, M. A. and Stets, J. E. (eds.) (1989).Violence in Dating Relationships: Emerging Social Issues, Praeger, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Prescott, S., and Letko, C. (1977). A social psychological perspective. In Roy (ed.),Battered Women: A Social Psychological Study of Domestic Violence, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Sigelman, C. K., Berry, C. J., and Wiles, K. A. (1984). Violence in college student's dating relationships.J. Appl. Social Psychol. 5–6: 530–548.Google Scholar
  19. Stordeur, R. A., and Stille, R. (1989).Ending Men's Violence Against their Partners. Sage, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (1990).Physical Violence in American Families. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick.Google Scholar
  21. Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J. and Steinmetz, S. K. (1990).Behind Closed Doors: Violence in the American Family, Doubleday, Garden City.Google Scholar
  22. Straus, M. A., and Hotaling, G. T. (eds.) (1980).The Social Causes of Husband-Wife Violence. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  23. Sutherland, E. H. (1939).Principles of Criminology, Lippincott, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  24. Yllo, K., and Straus, M. A. (1981). Interpersonal violence among married and cohabitating couples.Fam. Relat., 30: 339–347.Google Scholar
  25. Zimring, F. E., and Frase, R. S. (1980).The Criminal Justice System: Materials on the Administration and Reform of the Criminal Law. Brown and Co., Boston.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicky Ali Jackson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Behavioral SciencesPurdue University-CalumetHammond

Personalised recommendations