Advertisement

European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

, Volume 38, Issue 5, pp 437–442 | Cite as

Post-surgical pain relief with zero-order intravenous infusions of meptazinol and morphine: a double-blind placebo-controlled evaluation of their effects on ventilation

  • C. Verborgh
  • F. Camu
Originals

Summary

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study has been made of the analgesic and respiratory effects of constant rate infusions of meptazinol and morphine in 30 patients after abdominal surgery.

Group I received meptazinol, loading dose 50 mg followed by i.v. infusion 0.5 mg · kg−1 · h−1, Group II received morphine, loading dose 5 mg and then an infusion of 0.05 mg · kg−1 · h−1, and Group III received saline.

After recovery from inhalation anaesthesia (without opiates or a local anaesthetic) pain relief and chemoreceptor carbon dioxide tolerance were assessed before and at various times after starting the analgesic infusion. A similar degree of pain relief was found after 10 min in Groups I and II, which lasted until the end of observation period (20 h). Heart rate and systolic and diastolic blood pressures were lower in Group II than in Groups I and III, and respiratory rate fell in Groups I and II.

After 6 h arterial carbon dioxide tensions (PaCO2) became significantly higher in Group II than Group III. The maximum percentage fall in mean tidal volume (VT) and expired minute volume (0VE) from the preinjection values was significant in Groups I and II. End-tidal carbon-dioxide (PETCO2) and PaCO2 were significantly higher after 20 h of infusion in Group II compared to Group I. The slope of 0VE/PETCO2 (<S>) was increased in Group I and it was significantly reduced in Group II. Analysis of derived variables, such as the CO2 intercept (CO2I) and minute ventilation at 7 kPa (0VE7), indicated a shift to the right of the slopes in Groups I and II, initially more so in Group I.

It is concluded that constant rate infusions of meptazinol and morphine were effective in providing postoperative pain relief. However, their effects on the central regulation of respiration were different, as meptazinol did not impair CO2 sensitivity whereas morphine did.

Key words

analgesia morphine meptazinol ventilatory response 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Nimmo WS, Todd JG (1985) Fentanyl by constant rate i.v. infusion for postoperative analgesia. Br J Anaesth 57: 250–254PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rutter PC, Murphy F, Dudley HA (1980) Morphine: controlled trial of different methods of administration for postoperative pain relief. Br Med J 1: 12–13Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hedges A, Rose J, Leighton M, Turner P (1977) A double-blind comparison of meptazinol with placebo in postoperative pain. J Clin Pharmacol 17: 125–127PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Paymaster NJ (1976) Clinical assessment of oral meptazinol in postoperative pain. Acta Anaesth Belg 27: 159–170PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Paymaster NJ (1976) Clinical evaluation of meptazinol a new analgesic in postoperative pain. Br J Anaesth 48: 599–605PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Verschraegen R, Rosseel MT, Bogaert M, Rolly G (1976) Meptazinol: IM use in postoperative pain. Acta Anaesth Belg 27: 123–132PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Budd K (1976) Meptazinol — a new analgesic. Effect on hemodynamic stability. Acta Anaesth Belg 27: 151–158PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hedges A, Turner P, Wadsworth J (1980) A double-blind comparison of meptazinol with pethidine in postoperative pain. Br J Anaesth 52: 295–298PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gibbs JM, Johnson HD (1980) A trial of meptazinol for the relief of pain after abdominal surgery. Anaesth Intens Care 8: 441–444Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kingston HGG (1978) Meptazinol after open heart surgery. Br J Anaesth 50: 867PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shattery PJ, Harmer M, Rozen M, Vickers MD (1981) Comparison of meptazinol and pethidine given i.v. on demand in the management of postoperative pain. Br J Anaesth 53: 927–931Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Verborgh C, Vanderauwera D, Camu F (1987) Meptazinol for postsurgical pain relief in man: a comparison of extradural and I.M. administration. Br J Anaesth 59: 1134–1139PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rao U, Cambell IT, Catley DM, Sutherst JR (1985) Epidural meptazinol for pain relief after lower abdominal surgery. Anaesthesia 40: 754–758PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ling GSF, Spiegel K, Nishimura SL, Pasternak GW (1983) Dissociation of morphine's analgesic and respiratory depressant actions. Eur J Pharmacol 86: 487–488PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spiegel K, Pasternak GW (1984) Meptazinol: a novel μ-1 selective opioid analgesic. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 228: 414–418PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Green D (1983) Current concepts concerning the mode of action of meptazinol as an analgesic. Postgrad Med J 59 [Suppl 1]: 9–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Revill SI, Robinson JO, Rosen M, Hogg MIJ (1976) The reliability of a linear analogue scale for evaluation of pain. Anaesthesia 31: 1191–1198PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Read DJC (1967) A clinical method for assessing the ventilatory response to carbon dioxide. Austr Ann Med 16: 20–32Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cohen DG, Major E, Jothillingham S, Clark G, Coutinho P (1983) Meptazinol in the treatment of severe postoperative pain. A comparison with morphine. Postgrad Med J 59: 41–46Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Harmer M, Shatterly PJ, Rosen M, Vickers MD (1983) Intramuscular on demand analgesia: double-blind controlled trial of pethidine, buprenorphine, morphine and meptazinol. Br Med J 286: 680–682Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bilsback P, Rolly G, Tampubolon O (1985) Efficacy of extradural administration of lofentanil, buprenorphine or saline in the management of postoperative pain. A double-blind study. Br J Anaesth 57: 943–948PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stephen RJ, Waterfall JF, Franklin RA (1978) A review of the biological properties and metabolic disposition of the new analgesic agent, meptazinol. Gen Pharmacol 9: 73–78Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Guz A, Noble MIM, Widdicombe JB, Treuchard D, Muschein WW (1966) The effect of bilateral block of vagus and glossopharyngeal nerves on the ventilatory response to CO2 of conscious man. Resp Physiol 1: 206Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jordan C, Lehane JR, Robson PJ, Jones JG (1979) A comparison of the respiratory effects of meptazinol, pentazocine and morphine. Br J Anaesth 51: 497–501PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jones JG (1983) The respiratory effects of meptazinol. Postgrad Med J 59 [Suppl 1]: 72–77PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Verborgh
    • 1
  • F. Camu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Anaesthesiology, Academisch ZiekenhuisFlemish Free University of BrusselsBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations