Post-surgical pain relief with zero-order intravenous infusions of meptazinol and morphine: a double-blind placebo-controlled evaluation of their effects on ventilation
- 27 Downloads
A double-blind, placebo-controlled study has been made of the analgesic and respiratory effects of constant rate infusions of meptazinol and morphine in 30 patients after abdominal surgery.
Group I received meptazinol, loading dose 50 mg followed by i.v. infusion 0.5 mg · kg−1 · h−1, Group II received morphine, loading dose 5 mg and then an infusion of 0.05 mg · kg−1 · h−1, and Group III received saline.
After recovery from inhalation anaesthesia (without opiates or a local anaesthetic) pain relief and chemoreceptor carbon dioxide tolerance were assessed before and at various times after starting the analgesic infusion. A similar degree of pain relief was found after 10 min in Groups I and II, which lasted until the end of observation period (20 h). Heart rate and systolic and diastolic blood pressures were lower in Group II than in Groups I and III, and respiratory rate fell in Groups I and II.
After 6 h arterial carbon dioxide tensions (PaCO2) became significantly higher in Group II than Group III. The maximum percentage fall in mean tidal volume (VT) and expired minute volume (0VE) from the preinjection values was significant in Groups I and II. End-tidal carbon-dioxide (PETCO2) and PaCO2 were significantly higher after 20 h of infusion in Group II compared to Group I. The slope of 0VE/PETCO2 (<S>) was increased in Group I and it was significantly reduced in Group II. Analysis of derived variables, such as the CO2 intercept (CO2I) and minute ventilation at 7 kPa (0VE7), indicated a shift to the right of the slopes in Groups I and II, initially more so in Group I.
It is concluded that constant rate infusions of meptazinol and morphine were effective in providing postoperative pain relief. However, their effects on the central regulation of respiration were different, as meptazinol did not impair CO2 sensitivity whereas morphine did.
Key wordsanalgesia morphine meptazinol ventilatory response
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Rutter PC, Murphy F, Dudley HA (1980) Morphine: controlled trial of different methods of administration for postoperative pain relief. Br Med J 1: 12–13Google Scholar
- 9.Gibbs JM, Johnson HD (1980) A trial of meptazinol for the relief of pain after abdominal surgery. Anaesth Intens Care 8: 441–444Google Scholar
- 11.Shattery PJ, Harmer M, Rozen M, Vickers MD (1981) Comparison of meptazinol and pethidine given i.v. on demand in the management of postoperative pain. Br J Anaesth 53: 927–931Google Scholar
- 18.Read DJC (1967) A clinical method for assessing the ventilatory response to carbon dioxide. Austr Ann Med 16: 20–32Google Scholar
- 19.Cohen DG, Major E, Jothillingham S, Clark G, Coutinho P (1983) Meptazinol in the treatment of severe postoperative pain. A comparison with morphine. Postgrad Med J 59: 41–46Google Scholar
- 20.Harmer M, Shatterly PJ, Rosen M, Vickers MD (1983) Intramuscular on demand analgesia: double-blind controlled trial of pethidine, buprenorphine, morphine and meptazinol. Br Med J 286: 680–682Google Scholar
- 22.Stephen RJ, Waterfall JF, Franklin RA (1978) A review of the biological properties and metabolic disposition of the new analgesic agent, meptazinol. Gen Pharmacol 9: 73–78Google Scholar
- 23.Guz A, Noble MIM, Widdicombe JB, Treuchard D, Muschein WW (1966) The effect of bilateral block of vagus and glossopharyngeal nerves on the ventilatory response to CO2 of conscious man. Resp Physiol 1: 206Google Scholar