Abstract
Rape reform legislation in Canada was designed to change: 1) the way sexual assault cases were processed by the criminal justice system and 2) public opinion about crimes of sexual aggression. This article reports findings from a representative survey of the Canadian public and an experimental analysis of the effects of the legislation on public knowledge and attitudes. Results from the nation-wide survey indicated that most people are unaware of the semantic shift (from the old language of rape and indecent assault to the new crimes of sexual assault). However, there is awareness of the substantive legal changes introduced by the rape reform legislation (such as the fact that husbands are no longer immune from criminal changes involving their wives). It is clear that rape reform legislation has affected public knowledge of statutory reforms regarding crimes of sexual aggression. Results from the experimental component of this research show that the new sexual assault label has not achieved one of the important goals, namely of changing public perceptions of the nature of crimes of sexual aggression. Indeed, one negative effect predicted by feminist writers seems to have emerged: sentencing decisions made by the public for the offense of rape were less severe when the incident was described as a sexual assault.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boyle, C. (1994). The Judicial Construction of the Sexual Assault Offences in Canada. In Roberts, J., and Mohr, R. (eds.)Confronting Sexual Assault, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
Chase, G. (1982). Analysis of the new sexual assault laws.Canad. Wom. Studies, 4: 43–54.
Department of Justice Canada (1988).After Sexual Assault: Your Guide to the Criminal Justice System, Department of Justice Canada, Ottawa.
Grossman, M. (1990).Canadian Legislative Changes in the Area of Sexual Aggression: An Experimental Survey, University of Toronto, Toronto.
Hilton, N. (1989). When is an assault not an assault? The Canadian public’s attitudes towards wife and stranger assault.J. Fam. Viol. 4: 323–337.
Lafree, G., Reskin, B. and Visher, C. (1985). Jurors’ responses to victims’ behavior and legal issues in sexual assault.Social Probl. 32: 389–407.
Marsh, J., Geist, A. and Caplan, N. (1982).Rape and the Limits of Law Reform, Auburn House, Boston.
Roberts, J. V. (1992). Public Opinion, Crime and Criminal Justice. In Tonry, M. (ed.),Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Roberts, J. V. (1994a).Public Knowledge of Crime and Criminal Justice, Department of Justice Canada, Ottawa.
Roberts, J. V. (1994b).Criminal Justice Processing of Sexual Assault Cases, Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics, Ottawa.
Roberts, J. V., and Doob, A. (1990). News media influences on public views of sentencing.Law Hum. Behav. 14: 451–468.
Roberts, J. V., and Gebotys, R. (1992). Reforming rape laws: Effects of legislative change in Canada.Law Hum. Behav. 16: 555–573.
Roberts, J. V., and Mohr, R. M. (eds.) (1994).Confronting Sexual Assault, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roberts, J.V., Grossman, M.G. & Gebotys, R.J. Rape reform in Canada: Public knowledge and opinion. J Fam Viol 11, 133–148 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02336666
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02336666