Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of safe, effective intravenous sedation for utilization in endoscopic procedures

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The prevention of anesthetic mishaps during endoscopic procedures is of great importance to physicians in training. With the large number of such procedures performed each year, even infrequent adverse anesthetic reactions may result in a significant number of problems. To establish the safety and efficacy of an anesthetic regimen using intravenous meperidine and diazepam, all endoscopic procedures performed at one teaching institution in a 4-month period were retrospectively analyzed with regard to: (1) type and dosage of sedation/anesthesia, (2) endoscopic procedure involved, (3) effect of any underlying disease state, (4) side effects, (5) endoscopic complications, and (6) overall patient acceptance. A total of 716 patients underwent 913 endoscopic procedures with 876 separate anesthetic/intravenous sedations. General anesthesia was utilized in 44% of the 155 pediatric procedures. In the adult patients, intravenous sedation was administered by a physician-in-training under supervision except in 9% of cases (66 patients) when intravenous sedation utilizing alternative agents was given by the anesthesia department. The dose of sedation used (per body weight) declined with increasing age in the pediatric group (0–19 years). The adult dose remained constant for the next eight decades of life (meperidine 0.76±0.33 mg/kg; diazepam 0.12±0.08 mg/kg). In the adult group, 758 procedures were performed: 371 patients underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy, 258 colonoscopy, 36 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, 40 flexible sigmoidoscopy, and 51 percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Anesthetic-related complications (transient apnea and itching), were noted in two patients, and naloxone was utilized to reverse oversedation in a further 17 (2.56%). Three perforations occurred [two colonic, one esophageal (0.42%)] and were recognized immediately. Overall, patient acceptance of intravenous sedation was good (86%). Thus, intravenous sedation utilizing meperidine and diazepam has been shown to be reproducible, safe, and very effective during endoscopic training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Atrakchi HA (1989) Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy without sedation: a prospective study of 2,000 examinations. Gastrointest Endosc 35: 79–81

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beavis AK, LaBrooy S, Misiewicz JJ (1979) Evaluation of one-visit endoscopic clinic for patients with dyspepsia. Br Med J 1: 1387–1389

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boldy DAR, Lever LR, Unwin PR, Spencer PA, Hoare AM (1988) Sedation for endoscopy: midazolam or diazepam and pethidine? Br J Anaesth 61: 698–701

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cantor DS, Baldridge ET (1986) Premedication with meperidine and diazepam for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy precludes the need for topical anesthesia. Gastrointest Endosc 32: 339–341

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cavallo G, Cuomo R, Viscardi A, Capalbo G, Migliociro A, Budillon G (1985) Hypnosis for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 31: 228

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cole SG, Brozinsky S, Isenberg JI (1983) Midazolam, a new, more potent benzodiazepine, compared with diazepam: a randomized, double-blind study of pre-endoscopic sedatives. Gastrointest Endosc 29: 219–222

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cook PJ, Bennett PN, Lennard-Jones JE, Warnes TW (1978) Premedication for endoscopy: a trial of atropine, pentazocine, or pethidine as a supplement to diazepam. Scand J Gastroenterol 13: 33–39

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cotton PB, Williams CB (1982) Practical gastrointestinal endoscopy. Blackwell, Boston, pp 20–22

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fleischer D (1989) Monitoring the patient receiving conscious sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy: issues and guidelines. Gastrointest Endosc 35: 262–266

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gilman AG, Goodman LS, Rall TW, Murad F (1985) Goodman and Gilman's, The pharmacological basis of therapeutics, 7th edn. McMillan, New York, p 269

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hoare AA, Hawkins CF (1976) Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with and without sedation: patient's opinion. Br Med J 2: 20

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kjaergard H, Nordkild P, Geerdsen J, Dyrberg V (1986) Anesthesia for colonoscopy. An examination of the anesthesia as an element of risk at colonoscopy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 30: 60–63

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lavies NG, Creasy T, Harris K, Hanning CD (1988) Arterial oxygen saturation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: influence of sedation and operator experience. Am J Gastroenterol 83: 618–622

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee MG, Hanna W, Harding H (1989) Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a comparative study of midazolam and diazepam. Gastrointest Endosc 35: 82–84

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lieberman DA, Wuerker CK, Katon RM (1985) Cardiopulmonary risk of esophagogastroduodenoscopy — role of endoscope diameter and systemic sedation. Gastroenterology 88: 468–472

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Magni VC, Frost RA, Leung JWC, Cotton PB (1983) A randomized comparison of midazolam and diazepam for sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Br J Anaesth 55: 1095–1101

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Merry AF, Clapham GJ, Walker JS (1988) The reversal of midazolam sedation with the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil (anexate). N Z Med J 101: 571–572

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rimmer KP, Graham K, Whitelaw WA, Field SK (1989) Mechanisms of hypoxemia during panendoscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol 11: 17–22

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ross WA (1989) Premedication for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 35: 120–126

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Toft P, Romeu U (1987) Comparison of midazolam and diazepam to supplement total intravenous anesthesia with ketamine for endoscopy. Can J Anaesth 34: 466–469

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was completed at the Mount Sinai Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andrus, C.H., Dean, P.A. & Ponsky, J.L. Evaluation of safe, effective intravenous sedation for utilization in endoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc 4, 179–183 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02336601

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02336601

Key words

Navigation