Advertisement

Res Publica

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 129–146 | Cite as

What's the problem?: Jean-François Lyotard and politics

  • Steven Benson
Article
  • 53 Downloads

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    See for example J.-F. Lyotard,The Differend: Phrases in Dispute, trans. G.V.D. Abbeele (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1988), xiii.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.-F. Lyotard and J.-L. Thébaud,Just Gaming, trans. W. Godzich (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1985), 74.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Bennington,Lyotard: Writing the Event (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1988), 2.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lyotard has now abandoned his use of Wittgenstein's notion of language games and replaced it with that of phrases and their regimens. His reason for doing this is to distance himself from what he concludes is implied by the notion of language games, “the constant arrogance of Western anthropocentrism”. Putting this conclusion to one side, phrase regimens and language games nevertheless do bear many resemblances whatever Lyotard wants to say about “anthropocentrism”. See J.-F. Lyotard, “Interview”,Diacritics 14/3 (Fall 1984), 17.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    I am indebted to one of the two anonymous referees who read an earlier version of this paper for suggesting my need to make this point.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    C. Norris,Uncritical Theory: Postmodernism, Intellectuals and the Gulf War (London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1992), 73–85.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Supra n.1, See for example, at xiii.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Supra n.2,, at 17.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Supra n.2,, at 16–17, 23 & 25. I have added to Lyotard's consideration of prescriptives the contrary, proscriptives.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.-F. Lyotard,Political Writings trans. B. Readings (London: UCL Press, 1993), 3.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Seesupra n.2,, at 69.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    These are things in a non-metaphysical sense, not “things in themselves” beyond the sensible “world”.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Supra n.2,, at 143 s.207.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J.-F. Lyotard,The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, trans. G. Bennington and B. Massumi (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1984), xxiv. And see alsosupra n.2 J.-F. Lyotard and J.-L. Thébaud,Just Gaming, trans. W. Godzich (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1985), at 28.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Supra n.2, at 17.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Supra n.2, at 17 & 21–22; andsupra n.1 See for example J.-F. Lyotard,The Differend: Phrases in Dispute, trans. G.V.D. Abbeele (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1988), xiii, at 48–49 s.78, 128–129 ss.178 & 179, and 143 s.207.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Supra n.1 See for example, at 108 s.166.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Seesupra n.2, at 23;supra n.10 J.-F. Lyotard,Political Writings, trans. B. Readings (London: UCL Press, 1993), at 3; and esp.supra n.2 J.-F. Lyotard and J.-L. Thébaud,Just Gaming, trans. W. Godzich (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1985), at 172 s.239, where Lyotard attributes to Marxists a position that is contrary to the one that he attributes to them in “Tomb of the Intellectual”. No longer is the “proletariat” a concept from which a description is made of “a situation or a condition”. Instead, it is the something that is, supposedly, being described. This change in the positioning of the “proletariat”, from concept to referent, thus enables Lyotard to make impossible demands on the Marxist: to “supply the proof that the proletariat is real”.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Supra n.2, at 22.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Supra n.2, at 23.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Supra n.2, at 23.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Supra n.2, at 32 s.47.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Supra n.2, at 32 s.47.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    H. Putnam,Reason, Truth and History (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1981), 49–50.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Supra n.10, at 3.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    I am echoing here, and qualifying, a point made by Bill Readings. Seesupra n.10, at xvi.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Supra n.2 at 172 s.239.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Supra, n.1, See for example, at 143 s.207; and see 128 s.178.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Supra n.1, See for example, at xii.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Supra n.1 See for example, at 14 s.25.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Supra n.14,, at 65.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Supra n.1, See for example, 143–144 s.207.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Supra n.1, See for example, at 172 s.239.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Supra n.1, See for example, at 142–143 ss.204 & 207.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Supra n.1, See for example, at 143 s.207.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Supra n.1, See for example, at 143 s.207.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Supra n.1, See for example, at 143 s.207.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Supra n.2,, at 66–7.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    J.-F. Lyotard,The Postmodern Explained to Children, eds. J. Pefanis and M. Thomas (London: Turnaround, 1992), 54.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Supra n.1, See for example, xii.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Supra n.1, See for example, at 143 s.207.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Supra n.1, See for example, at xii, 29 s.41, 40 s.60, and 43–44 s.67.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Supra n.1, See for example, at 40 s.60; and see alsosupra n. 15, at 9.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Supra n.14,, at 9. One of the reasons he gives inThe Differend is that descriptions are made in “relation to a world of names”. Seesupra n.1, at 40 s.60.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Supra n.1, See for example, at 143 s.207.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Supra n.14,, at 9 & 19.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Supra n.10,, at 3.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Supra n.14,, at 82.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    R. Rorty,Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 107.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    R. Rorty,Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 23.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    R. Rorty, “Feminism and Pragmatism”,Radical Philosophy 58 (Autumn 1991), 4.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Supra n.2,, at 59.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Supra n.2,, at 59.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Supra n.2,, at 74.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Supra n.2,, at 74.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Supra n.2,, at 76 & 81.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Supra n.2,, at 82.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    I. Kant,The Critique of Judgement, trans. J. C. Meredith (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1952), 97.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Supra n.2,, at 28.Google Scholar
  60. 61.
    Supra n.2,, at 81.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Deborah Charles Publications 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven Benson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PoliticsUniversity of YorkYorkUK

Personalised recommendations