Abstract
The controversy surrounding the implementation of affirmative action interventions in organizations underscores the importance of understanding fairness perceptions of such policies. There is a need for research on the variables which influence evaluations of affirmative action policies and on whether the content of organizational communications can alter these evaluations. The present study was designed to investigate the effects of proaffirmative action and antiaffirmative action communications on fairness evaluations. Cognitive response theory was used as a framework for predicting reactions to pro- and antipreferential treatment messages and subsequent fairness perceptions. While the results indicated that cognitive responses added to the prediction of fairness judgments, initial attitude, and message content also had strong effects on the fairness judgments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abelson, R. P. (1988). Conviction,Am. Psychol. 43: 267–275.
Austin, W., Friedman, J. S., Martz, R. A., Hooe, G. S., and Ball, K. P. (1977). Responses to favorable sex discrimination.Law Hum. Behav. 1: 283–298.
Cacioppo, J. T., Glass, C. R., & Merluzzi, T. V. (1979). Self-statements and self-evaluations: A cognitive response analysis of heterosocial anxiety.Cognit. Ther. Res. 3: 249–262.
Cacioppo, J. T., harkins, S. G., and Petty, P. E. (1981). The nature of attitudes and cognitive responses and their relationship to behavior. In Petty, R. E., Ostrom, T. M., and Brock, T. C. (eds.),Cognitive Responses in Persuasion, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Cacioppo, J. T., and Petty, R. E. (1981). Social psychological procedures for cognitive response assessment: The thought-listing technique. In Merluzzi, T. V., Glass, C. R., and Genest, M. ( (eds.),Cognitive Assessment, Guilford, New York.
Chako, T. I. (1982). Women and equal employment opportunity: Some unintended effects.J. Appl. Psychol. 67: 119–123.
Garcia, L. T., Erskine, N., Hawn, K., and Casmay, S. R. (1981). The effect of affirmative action on attributions about minority group members.J. Pers. 49: 427–437.
Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories.Acad. Manage. Rev. 12: 9–22.
Greenberg, J. (1988). Cultivating an image of justice: Looking fair on the job.Acad. Manage. Exec. 2: 155–157.
Greenwald, A. G. (1968). Cognitive learning, cognitive response to persuasion, and attitude change. In Greenwald, A. G., Broock, T. C., and Ostrom, T. M. (Eds.),Psychological Foundations of Attitudes (pp. 147–170). Academic Press, New York.
Heilman, M. E., and Herlihy, J. M. (1984). Affirmative action, negative reactions? Some moderating conditions.Organ. Behav. Hum. Perf. 33: 204–213.
Heilman, M. E., Lucas, J. A., and Kaplow, S. R. (1990). Self-derogating consequences of sex-based preferential selection: The moderating role of initial self-confidence.Organ. Behav. Hum. Decision Process. 46: 202–216.
Heilman, M. E., Rivero, J. C., and Brett, J. F. (1991). Skirting the competence issue: Effects of sex-based preferential selection on task choices of women and men.J. Appl. Psychol. 76: 99–105.
Heilman, M. E., Simon, M. C., and Repper, D. P. (1987). Intentionally favored, unintentionally harmed? Impact of sex-based preferential selection on self-perceptions and self-evaluations.J. Appl. Psychol. 72: 62–68.
Johnson, B. T., and Eagly, A. H. (1989). Effects of involvement on persuasion: A meta-analysis.Psychol. Bull. 106: 290–314.
Miller, N., and Coleman, D. E. (1981). Methodological issues in analyzing the cognitive mediation of persuasion. In Petty, R. E., Ostrom, T. M., and Brock, T. C. (eds.),Cognitive Responses in Persuasion, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Nacoste, R. W. (1985). Selection procedure and responses to affirmative action.Law Hum. Behav. 9: 225–241.
Nacoste, R. W. (1987a). But do they care about fairness? The dynamics of preferential treatment and minority interest.Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 8: 177–191.
Nacoste, R. W., (1987b). Social psychology and affirmative action: The importance of process in policy analysis.J. Soc. Issues 43: 127–132.
Nacoste, R. W. (1989). Affirmative action and self evaluation. In Blanchard, F. A., and Crosby, F. J. (eds.),Affirmbtive Action in Perspective, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978).Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Osgood, C. E., and Suci, G. J. (1969). Factor analysis of meaning. In Snider, J. G., and Osgood, C. E. (eds.),Semantic Differential Technique, Aldine, Chicago.
Ostrom, T. M., and Brock, T. C. (1968). A cognitive model of attitudinal involvement. In Abelson, R. P., Aronson, E., McGuire, W. J., Newcomb, T. M., Rosenberg, M. I. and Tannenbaum, P. H. (eds.),Theories of Cognitive Consistency: A Sourcebook, Rand McNally, Chicago.
Petty, R. E., and Cacioppo, J. T. (1977). Forewarning, cognitive responding, and resistance to persuasion,J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 35: 645–655.
Petty, R. E., and Cacioppo, J. T. (1979a). Effects of forewarning of persuasive intent and involvement on cognitive responses and persuasion.Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 5: 173–176.
Petty, R. E., and Cacioppo, J. T. (1979b). Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 37: 1915–1926.
Petty, R. E., and Cacioppo, J. T. (1981a).Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches, Wm. C. Brown, Dubuque, IA.
Petty, R. E., and Cacioppo, J. T. (1981b). Social psychological procedures for cognitive response assessment: The thought-listing technique. In Merluzzi, T. V., Glass, C. R., & Genest, M. (eds.),Cognitive Assessment (pp. 309–342), Guilford, New York.
Petty, R. E., and Cacioppo, J. T. (1985). Elaboration likelihood model of persuasion.Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 19: 125–205.
Petty, R. E., Wells, G. L., & Brock, T. C. (1976). Distraction can enhance or reduce yielding to propaganda. Thought disruption versus effort justification.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 34: 874–884.
Seligman, D. (1975). How “equal opportunity” turned into employment quotas. In Wexley, K. N., and Yuki, G. A. (eds.),Organizational Behavior and Industrial Psychology, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 470–479.
Taylor, M. A. (1990). The effect of positive and negative presentations of preferential treatment on fairness perceptions: A cognitive response analysis.Dissertation Abstracts International 50: 5915.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taylor-Carter, M.A., Doverspike, D. & Alexander, R. Message effects on the perceptions of the fairness of gender-based affirmative action: A cognitive response theory-based analysis. Soc Just Res 8, 285–303 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02334812
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02334812