Abstract
Two studies using vignettes explore some conditions under which equity, equality, and need as allocation rules are taken into account by an outside allocator. Independent variables include information about success or failure of a work group, level of morale of the group, relative contributions of work group members, responsibility for outcome, and influence of one individual on others. Results suggest that differentiation based on both equity and need results from a focus on individual deserving while equality among status equals results from focus on group level factors. An interaction between outcome and contribution appears when group level factors are included; these effects also appear when there are two rather than only one target person differing from the rest of a group; an overreward effect depends on attributions of responsibility for outcome; and an influential member is seen as deserving even if a low contributor. No gender differences were found.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, N. H. (1976). Equity judgments as information integration.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 33: 291–299.
Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., and Tipton, S. M. (1985).Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life, Harper and Row, New York.
Berger, J., Zelditch, M., Jr., Anderson, B., and Cohen, B. P. (1972). Structural aspects of distributive justice: A status value formulation. In Berger, J., Zelditch, M., Jr., and Anderson, B. (eds.),Sociological Theories in Progress, Vol. 2. Houghton Mifflin, New York, pp. 119–146.
Berger, J., Fisek, M. H., Norman, R. Z., and Wagner, D. G. (1985). Formation of reward expectations in status situations. In Berger, J., and Zelditch, M., Jr. (eds.).Status, Rewards and Influence, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 215–261.
Cook, K. S., and Hegtvedt, K. A. (1983). Distributive justice, equity, and equality.Ann. Rev. Sociol. 9: 217–241.
Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need; What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice?J. Soc. Issues 31: 137–149.
Deutsch, M. (1985).Distributive Justice: A Social-Psychological Perspective, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
Elliott, G. C., and Meeker, B. F. (1984). Modifiers of the equity effect: Group outcome and causes for individual performance.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 46: 586–597.
Elliott, G. C., and Meeker, B. F. (1986). Achieving fairness in the face of competing concerns: The different effect of individual and group characteristics.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 50: 754–760.
Greenberg, J., and Cohen, R. L. (eds.). (1982).Equity and Justice in Social Behavior, Academic Press, New York.
Griffith, W. I. (1989). The allocation of negative outcomes. In Lawler, E. J., and Markovsky, B. (eds.),Advances in Group Processes, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 107–137.
Griffith, W. I. (1990). The effects of inputs and performance outcomes on allocation decisions.Soc. Justice Res. 4: 35–47.
Griffith, W. L., and Sell, J. (1988). The effects of competition on allocators' preferences for contributive and retributive justice rules.Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 18: 443–455.
Harris, R. J. (1983). Pinning down the equity formula. In Messick, D. M., and Cook, K. S. (eds.),Equity Theory: Psychological and Sociological Perspectives, Praeger, New York, pp. 207–241.
Hegtvedt, K. A., and Markovsky, B. (1994). Justice and injustice. In Cook, K. S., Fine, G. A., and House, J. (eds.),Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology, Allyn and Bacon, New York.
Jasso, G. (1980). A new theory of distributive justice.Am. Sociol. Rev. 45: 3–32.
Lamm, H., Kayser, E., and Schanz, V. (1983). An attributional analysis of interpersonal justice: Ability and effort as inputs in the allocation of gain and loss.J. Soc. Psychol. 119: 269–281.
Markovsky, B. (1988). Anchoring justice.Soc. Psychol. Quart. 51: 213–224.
Meeker, B. F. (1971). Decisions and exchange.Am. Sociol. Rev. 36: 485–495.
Meeker, B. F., and Elliott, G. C. (1987). Counting the costs: Equity and the allocation of negative group products.Soc. Psychol. Quart. 50: 7–15.
Sell, J., and Griffith, W. I. (in press). Competition and equity.Social Justice Research.
Stolte, J. (1987). Formation of justice norms.Am. Sociol. Rev. 52: 774–784.
Tornblom, K. Y. (1988). Positive and negative allocations: A typology and a model for conflicting justice principles. In Lawler, E. J., and Markovsky, B. (eds.),Advances in Group Processes, Vol. 5, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 141–168.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meeker, B.F., Elliott, G.C. Equality and differentiation: Effects of group structure on allocations. Soc Just Res 8, 263–284 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02334811
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02334811