Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On the problem of imprecision

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Among the problems raised by admitting statements which are neither true nor false is the problem of how we are to cope with vague concepts. One method of dealing with such concepts has been suggested by Rosser/Turquette (1952), i.e. the employment of a many valued set theory. It is our intention in this paper to discuss the use of many valued logics, especially the set theoretical proposals of Zadeh and Brown, in dealing with this problem. Towards this end, we shall pay close attention to the development of the concepts of fuzzy sets and fuzzy systems. In this regard, it will be argued that Zadeh had in mind a many valued logic where the connectives are interpreted according to Lukasiewicz and Tarski, whereas Brown's version may be based upon a Boolean-valued logic. Furthermore, we shall have occasion to distinguish between two sources of imprecision in specifying the membership of classes, i.e. conceptual vagueness and imprecision due to inexact measurement. Due to Suppes' work in this field, the latter sort of imprecision may be exemplified by providing a theory of the inexact measurement of subjective probability. Finally, we shall discuss some ways in which these two types of imprecision are intertwined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibiliography

  • Brown, J. G., ‘A Note on Fuzzy Sets’Information and Control 18 (1971), 32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. C., ‘Theory of Models of Infinite Valued Logics I–IV’Notices Am. Math. Soc. 8 (1961), 68, 141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. C. and Keisler, H. J.,Continuous Model Theory, Princeton (1966).

  • Chapin, E. W., ‘Set-Valued Set Theory I’Notre Dame J. Formal Logic (1974).

  • Dempster, A. P., ‘Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Many Valued Mapping’Ann. Math. Stat. 38 (1967), 325–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, T., ‘A Note on the Existence of Quantitative Probability’Ann. Math. Stat. 42 (1971), 1182–1186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, T.,Theories of Probability, New York (1973).

  • Frayne, T. E., Morel, A. C., and Scott, D. S., ‘Reduced Direct Products’Fund. Math. 51 (1962), 195–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goguen, J. A., ‘L-Fuzzy Sets’J. Math. Anal. Appl. 18 (1967), 145–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraft, C. H., Pratt, J. W., and Seidenberg, A., ‘Intuitive Probability on Finite Sets’Ann. Math. Stat. 30 (1959), 408–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. D., Suppes, P., and Tversky, A.,Foundations of Measurement, New York (1971).

  • Luce, R. D., ‘Sufficient Conditions for the Existence of a Finitely Additive Probability Measure’Ann. Math. Stat. 38 (1967), 780–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukasiewicz, J. and Tarski, A., ‘Untersuchungen über den Aussagenkalkül’Comp. Rend. Séanc. Soc. Sci. Lett. Varsovie, Classe III 23 (1930), 30–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, E. L., ‘Introduction to a General Theory of Elementary Propositions’Am. J. Math. 43 (1921), 165–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosser, J. B.,Simplified Independence Proofs, New York (1969).

  • Rosser, J. B. and Turquette, A. R.,Many-Valued Logics, Amsterdam (1952).

  • Savage, L. J.,The Foundations of Statistics, New York (1954).

  • Scott, D., ‘Measurement Structures and Linear Inequalities’J. Math. Psych. 1 (1964), 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D., ‘A Proof of the Independence of the Continuum Hypothesis’Math. Syst. Th. 1 (1967), 89–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. and Krauss, P., ‘Assigning Probabilities to Logical Formulas’ in Hintikka, J. and Suppes, P. (eds.),Aspects of Inductive Logic, Amsterdam (1966).

  • Skala, H. J.,Über einige Grundprobleme der Nutzentheorie - Nichtarchimedische Nutzentheorie, Habilitation thesis, Heidelberg (1973).

  • Skala, H. J., Nonstandard Utilities and the Foundation of Game Theory,Int. J. Game Th. 3 (1974), 67–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skala, H. J.,Non-Archimedean Utility Theory, Dordrecht (1975).

  • Suppes, P., ‘The Measurement of Belief’J. Royal Stat. Soc. 36 (1974), 160–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wajsbefg, M., ‘Aksjomatyzacja trójwartsciowego rachunku zdán’Comp. Rend. Séanc. Soc. Sci. Lett. Varsovie, Classe III,24 (1931), 126–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. H., ‘Fuzzy Sets’Information Control 8 (1965), 338–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. H., ‘Probability Measures of Fuzzy Events’J. Math. Anal. Appl. 23 (1968), 421–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Heinz J. Skala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Skala, H.J. On the problem of imprecision. Theor Decis 7, 159–170 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02334312

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02334312

Keywords

Search

Navigation