Skip to main content

Blaming the victim: Belief in control or belief in justice?

Social Justice Research volume 7, pages 69–90 (1994)Cite this article

Abstract

The attribution of responsibility to victims of bad fate (“blaming the victim”) is discussed under the perspective of Just World Theory (Lerner, 1980) and the Defensive Attribution Hypothesis (Walster, 1966; Shaver, 1970). Whereas Just World Theory suggests that the belief in a just world is the decisive motive of increased attributions of responsibility, the Defensive Attribution Hypothesis assumes that these attributions are motivated by the need to believe in internal locus of control. Research evidence shows both motives as conceptually linked and empirically correlated. The central question is whether belief in a just world and belief in internal control are facets of the same latent variable or empirically distinguishable constructs, and whether they contribute independently to attributions of responsibility and blame to victims of misfortune. Results of a questionnaire study assessing opinions about cancer and cancer victims are reported. There is evidence from factor analyses that the two motives are indeed distinguishable constructs. The correlation patterns and the results of multiple regression analyses show that both motives are meaningfully related to attributions of responsibility. Moreover, it is suggested that belief in a just world is not a homogeneous construct. Belief in immanent justice according to which present misfortune is seen as a consequence of prior faults and sins is differentiated from belief in ultimate justice according to which one can be sure that present misfortune will be compensated in the long run. Whereas belief in immanent justice is the most important predictor for attributions of responsibility, the suggested emotional consequences of such attributions, like belief in invulnerability or confidence in coping, can be predicted by belief in internal control and belief in ultimate justice. Finally, suggestions are made to extend Just World Theory to clarify the function of justice motives in the person's search for meaning in his or her life.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Alexander, C. S. (1980). The responsible victim: Nurses' perceptions of victims of rape.J. Health Soc. Behav. 21: 22–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, S. (1976). The attribution of responsibility for the outcome of an interpersonal interaction.J. Psychol. 93: 85–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, E. (1980).Das Prinzip Hoffnung, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, J. S., and McGrail, C. A. (1989). Attributions of responsibility for date and stranger rape.Sex Roles 21: 273–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broussard, S. D., and Wagner, W. G. (1988). Child sexual abuse: Who is to blame?Child Abuse Neglect 12: 563–569.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bulman, R. J., and Wortman, C. B. (1977). Attributions of blame and coping in the “real world”: Severe accident victims react to their lot.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 35: 351–363.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J. M. (1981). Motivational biases in the attribution of responsibility for an accident: a meta-analysis of the Defensive-Attribution Hypothesis.Psychol. Bull. 90: 496–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, B. E. (1974). Four components of the Rotter Internal-External scale: Belief in a difficult world, a just world, a predictable world, and a politically responsive world.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 29: 381–391.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Connors, G. J., Ranish, S. S., and Maisto, S. A. (1982). Alcohol and victim compensation as determinants of responsibility attribution in traffic accidents.J. Stud. Alcohol 43: 1251–1256.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, J. S., and Spooner, P. S. (1985). Five factor scales for internal-external control and their relations to measures of adjustment.J. Clin. Psychol. 41: 512–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., and Procter, E. (1992). Sphere-specific just world beliefs and attitudes to AIDS.Hum. Rel. 45: 265–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleason, J. M., and Harris, V. A. (1976). Perceived freedom, accident severity and empathic value as determinants of the attribution of responsibility.Soc. Behav. Pers. 4: 171–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbst, E. (1992). Zuschreibungen von Verantwortlichkeit und Schuld gegenüber Opfern durch unbeteiligte Dritte in ihrer Abhängigkeit von Gerechtigkeits- und Kontrollierbarkiets-überzeugungen sowie Gerechtigkeits- und Kontrollierbarkeits-zentralität. Unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit, Universität Trier.

  • Kaemmerer, W. F., and Schwebel, A. I. (1976). Factors of the Rotter Internal-External Scale.Psychol. Rep. 39: 107–114.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kordmann, P. (1991). Determinanten der Opferbeurteilung. Einflüsse von Gerechtigkeits- und Kontrollierbarkeitsüberzeugungen auf den Attributionsprozeβ. Unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit, Universität Trier.

  • Langley, T., Yost, E. A., O'Neal, E. C., Taylor, S. L.,et al. (1991). Models of rape judgment: Attributions concerning event, perpetrator, and victim.J. Offender Rehabil. 17: 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (1965). Evaluation of performance as a function of performer's reward and attractiveness.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1: 355–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive in social behavior. Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms.J. Pers. 45: 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (1978). ... but nobody liked the Indians. “Belief in a just world” versus the “Authoritarianism” syndrome.Ethnicity 5: 229–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (1980).Belief in a Just World. A Fundamental Delusion. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J., and Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead.Psychol. Bull. 85: 1030–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J., and Simmons, C. H. (1966). The observer's reaction to the “innocent victim”: compassion or rejection?J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 4: 203–210.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, H. (1972). Distinctions within the concept of internal- external control: Development of a new scale. Proceedings of the 80th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, pp. 261–262.

  • Lipkus, I. (1991). The construction and preliminary validation of a global belief in a just world scale and the exploratory analysis of the multidimensional belief in a just world scale.Pers. Indiv. Diff. 12: 1171–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. T. (1977). Altruism and threat to the belief in a just world.J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 13: 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montada, L. (1986). Life stress, injustice, and the question: “Who is responsible?” In Steensma, H., and Vermunt, G. (ed.),Justice in Human Relations, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montada, L. (1991). Attribution of responsibility for losses and perceived injustice. In Montada, L., Filipp, S.-H., and Lerner, M. J. (ed.), Life Crises and the Experience of Loss in Adulthood, Lawrence Eribaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montada, L., Schmitt, M., and Dalbert, C. (1986). Thinking about justice and dealing with one's own privileges: A study on existential guilt. In Bierhoff, H. W., Cohen, R., and Greenberg, J. (eds.), Justice in Social Relations, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 125–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1983).Le Jugement Moral Chez L'enfant, Alcan, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rim, Y. (1981). Who believes in graphology?Pers. Indiv. Diff. 2: 85–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.Psychol. Mongr. 80 (Whole No. 608): pp. 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Z., and Peplau, L. A. (1973). Belief in a just world and reactions to another's lot: A study of participants in the National Draft Lottery.J. Soc. Issues 29: 73–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Z., and Peplau, L. A. (1975). Who believes in a just world?J. Soc. Issues 31 (3): 65–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, W. (1971).Blaming the Victim, Pantheon, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadow, D. (1983). Irrational attributions of responsibility: Who, what, when, and why.Psychol. Rep. 52: 403–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, K. G. (1970). Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 14: 101–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E., Chapman, M., and Baltes, P. B. (1988). Control, means-ends, and agency beliefs: A new conceptualization and its measurement during childhood.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54: 117–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, S. (1979).Illness as a Metaphor, Vintage, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R. H. (1974). Internal-external control and the perception of responsibility of another for an accident.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 30: 393–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, B., Ryckman, R. M., and Robbins, M. A. (1982). The relationships of observer characteristics to beliefs in the causal responsibility of victims of sexual assault.Hum. Rel. 35: 321–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ugwuegbu, D. C., and Hendrick, C. (1974). Personal causality and attribution of responsibility.Soc. Behav. Pers. 2: 76–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine-French, S., and Radtke, H. L. (1989). Attributions of responsibility for an incident of sexual harassment in a university setting.Sex Roles 21: 545–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallacher, R. R., and Selz, K. (1991). Who's to blame? Action identification in allocating responsibility for alleged rape.Soc. Cognit. 9: 194–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E. (1966). Assignment of responsibility for an accident.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 3: 73–79.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Witt, L. A. (1989). Urban-nonurban differences in social cognition: Locus of control and perceptions of a just world.J. Soc. Psychol. 129: 715–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., and Gerbasi, K. C. (1977). Belief in internal control or belief in a just world: The use and misuse of the I-E-scale in prediction of attitudes and behavior.J. Pers. 45: 356–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., Gerbasi, K. C., and Marion, S. P. (1977). Correlates of the just world factor of Rotter's I-E Scale.Educ. Psychol. Measur. 37: 375–381.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universiät Trier, Germany

    Jürgen Maes

Authors
  1. Jürgen Maes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maes, J. Blaming the victim: Belief in control or belief in justice?. Soc Just Res 7, 69–90 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02333823

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02333823

Key Words

  • attribution of responsibility
  • attribution of blame
  • belief in a just world
  • locus of control
  • victimization
  • cancer
  • invulnerability