Social Justice Research

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 47–68 | Cite as

Victims' Responses to traumatic life events: An unjust world or an uncaring world?

  • Ronnie Janoff-Bulman
  • Hillary J. Morgan

Abstract

Although the psychological literature has generally equated deservingness and justice, victims' responses suggest the need to disentangle the two concepts. Victims usually feel their traumatic experience was undeserved but typically do not consider the outcome in terms of justice or fairness. Rather, their feelings about not deserving the victimization derive from a second type of moral judgment involving caring rather than justice. These two orientations are discussed in light of recent developments in work on moral reasoning. A framework for understanding the trauma of victimization is presented; the shattering of assumptions related to a caring world—in which people are protected from harm—is highlighted in this model. The crucialrole of social support and specific cognitive strategies used by victims in the aftermath of their victimization are discussed in terms of survivors' efforts to rebuild their assumptions about a caring world. Although concerns about justice are less common among survivors, an effort is made to discuss when these isues are most apt to arise.

Key words

traumatic events victimization moral judgment fairness deservingness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity,J. Abn. Soc. Psychol 67: 422–436.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Vol. 2, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Bard, M., and Sangrey, D. (1979).The Crime Victim's Book, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, E. (1973),The Denial of Death, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Bloom, L. (1977). Two dimensions of moral reasoning: Social principledness and social humanism in cross-cultural perspectives,J. Soc. Psychol. 101: 29–44.Google Scholar
  6. Boldizar, J. P., Wilson, K. L. and Deemer, D. K. (1989). Gender, life experiences, and moral judgment development: A process-oriented approach.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 57: 229–238.Google Scholar
  7. Bowlby, J. (1969).Attachment and Loss, Vol. 1: Attachment, Hogarth, London.Google Scholar
  8. Bowker, J. (1970).Problems of Suffering in Religions of the World, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  9. Burgess, A., and Holmstrom, L. (1978). Recovery from rape and prior life stress.Res. Nursing Health 1: 165–174.Google Scholar
  10. Bulman, R., and Wortman, C.B. (1977). Attributions of blame and coping in the “real world”: Severe accident victims react to their lot.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.35: 351–363.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen, S., and Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis,Psychol. Bull. 98: 310–357.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation.Psychol. Rev. 83: 85–113.Google Scholar
  13. Davis, J. A. (1959). A formal interpretation of the theory of relative deprivation.Sociometry 22: 280–296.Google Scholar
  14. Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value wil be used as a basis of distributive justice?J. Soc. Issues 31: 137–149.Google Scholar
  15. Dunkel-Schetter, C. A. (1984). Social support and cancer: Findings based on patient interviews and their implications.J. Soc. Issues 40: 77–98.Google Scholar
  16. Epstein, S. (1984). Controversial issues in emotion theory. In Shaver, P. (ed.).Review of Personality and Social Psychology: Emotions, Relationships, and health, Se, Beverly Hills, CAGoogle Scholar
  17. Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1952).An Object-Relations Therory of the Personality, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Figley, C. R. (ed.). (1978).Stress Disorders Among Vietnam Veterans: Theory, Research, and Treatment, Brunner/Mazcl, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Fischer, C. T. (1984). A phenomenological study of being criminall victimized Contributions and constraints of qualitative resoarch.J. Soc. Issues 40: 161–178.Google Scholar
  20. Fiske, S. T., and Taylor, S.E. (1991).Social cognition, McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Folger, R. (1987). Reformulating the preconditions of resentment: A referent cognitions model. In J. C. Masters and Smith, W. P. (eds.),Social Comparison, Social Justice, and Relative Deprivation, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  22. Ford, M. R., and Lowery, C. R. (1986). Gender differences in moral reasoning.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 50: 777–783.Google Scholar
  23. Funch, D. P., and Marshall, J. (1983). Therole of stress social support and age in survival from breast cancer.J. Psychosom. Res. 27: 77–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Furby, L. (1986). Psychology and justice. In Cohen, R. L. (ed.)Justice: Views from the Social Sciences, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Galotti, K. M. (1989). Gender differences inself-reported moral reasoning: A review and new evidence,J. Youth Adolesence 18: 475–488.Google Scholar
  26. Galotti, K. M., and Kozberg, S. F. (1987). Older adolescents' thinking about academic/vocational and interpersonal commitments.J. Youth Adolescence 16: 313–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gibbs, J. C., Arnold, K. D. and Burkhart, J. E. (1984). Sex differences in the expression of moral judgment,Child Dev. 55: 1040–1043.Google Scholar
  28. Gilligan, C. (1977). In a different voice: Women's conceptions of self and morality.Harvard Educ. Rev. 47: 481–517.Google Scholar
  29. Gilligan, C. (1982).In a different Voice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  30. Gilligan, C., Langdale, S., Lyons, N., and Murphy, J. (1982)The contribution of women's thought to developmental theory: The elimination of sex bias in moral development research and education. Final report to the National Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  31. Greenwald, A. G. (1980). The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history.Am. Psychol. 35: 603–618.Google Scholar
  32. Gurr, T. (1970):Why Men Rebel, Princeto University Press, Priceton, NJ.Google Scholar
  33. Hochschild, J. L. (1982).What's Fair? American Beliefs About Distribuive Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  34. Holmes, J. G. (1981). The exchange process inclose relationships. In Lerner, M. J., and Lerner, S. C. (eds).The Justice Motive in Social Behavior, Plenum Press New York.Google Scholar
  35. Janoff-Bulman, R. (1985). The aftermath of victimization: Rebuilding shattered assumptions. In Figley, C. (ed.),Trauma and its Wake: The Study and Treatment of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, Brunner/Mazel, New York.Google Scholar
  36. Janoff-Bulman, R. (1989). Assumptive worlds and the stress of traumatic events: Applications of theschema construct.Soc.Cognit. 7: 133–136.Google Scholar
  37. Janoff-Bulman, R (1992).Shattered Assumptions: Towards a New Psychology of Trauma, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  38. Kohlberg L. (1981).The Philosophy of Moral Development, Harper & Row, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  39. Lerner, M. J. (1980).The Beliefina Just World. A Fundamental Delusion, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  40. Lifton, P. D. (1985). Individual differences in moral development: The relation of sex, gender, and personality to morality.J. Pers. 53: 307–334.Google Scholar
  41. Lyons, N. (1983). Two perspectives: On self, relationships and morality.Harvad Educ. Rev. 53: 125–145.Google Scholar
  42. Montada, L. (1994). Injustice in harm and loss.Soc. Justice Res. 7: 5–28.Google Scholar
  43. Parkes, C. M. (1971). Psycho-social transitions: A field of study.Soc. Sci. Med.. 5: 101–115PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Piaget, J. (1932/1968).The Moral Judgment of the Child, Free Press, Glencoe, IL.Google Scholar
  45. Pratt, M. W., Golding, G., Hunter, W., and Norris, J. (1988). From inquiry to judgment: Age and sex differences in patterns of adult moral thinking and information-seeking.Int. J. Aging Hum. Dev. 27: 188.Google Scholar
  46. Pratt, M. W., Golding, G., Hunter, W., and Sampson, R. (1988). Sex differences in adult moral orientation.J. Pers. 56: 373–391.Google Scholar
  47. Prentice, D. A., and Crosby, F. (1987). The importance of context for assessing deservingness. In Masters, J. C. and Smith, W. P. (eds.),Social Comparison, Social Justice, and Relative Deprivation, Ewrlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  48. Reis, H. T. (1984). The multidimensionality of justice. In Folger, R. (ed.),The Sense of Injustice: Social Psychological Perspectives, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  49. Rothbart, M. K., Hanley, D., and Albert, M. (1986). Gender differences in moral reasoning.Sex Roles 15: 645–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Runciman, W. G. (1966).Relative Deprivation and Social Justice. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  51. Sampson, E. E. (1975). On justice as equality.J. Soc. Inssues 31: 45–64.Google Scholar
  52. Silver, R. L., and Wortman, C.B. (1980). Coping with underirable life events. In Garber, J., and Seligman, M. E. P. (eds.),Human Helplessness: Therapy and Application, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  53. Silver, R. L., Wortman, C. B., and Crofton, C. (1990). The role of coping in support provision: The self-presentational dilemma of victims of crises. In Sarason, B. R., and Sarason, I. G., and Pierce, G. R. (eds.),Social Support: A. Interactional View, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  54. Taylor, S. E. (1983). Adjustment to threatening events: A theory of congitive adaptation.Am. Psychol. 38: 1161–1173.Google Scholar
  55. Taylor, S. E. (1990).Positive Illusions: Creative Self-Deception and the Healthy Mind, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  56. Taylor, S. E., and Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social-psychological perspective on mental health.Psychol. Bull. 103: 193–210.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Taylor, S. E., Wood, J. V., and Lichtman, R. R. (1983). It could be worse: Selective evaluation as a response to victimization.J. Soc. Issues 39(2): 19–40.Google Scholar
  58. Thompson, S. C. (1985). Finding positive meaning in a stressful event and coping.Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 6: 279–295.Google Scholar
  59. Walker, L. (1984). Sex differences in the development of moral reasoning: A critical review of the literature.Child Dev. 55: 677–691.Google Scholar
  60. Walker, L. J., de Vries, B., and Trevethan, S. D. (1987). Moral stages and moral orientations in real-life and hypothetical dilemmas.Child Dev. 58: 842–858.Google Scholar
  61. Walster, E., Walster, G. W., and Berscheid, E. (1978).Equity: Theory and Research, Allyn & Bacon, Boston.Google Scholar
  62. Weinstein, N. D. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 39: 806–820.Google Scholar
  63. Weinstein, N. D. (1982). Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems.J. Behav. med. 5: 441–460.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Weinstein, N. D., and Lachendro, E. (1982). Egocentrism as a source of unrealistic optimism.Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 8: 195–200.Google Scholar
  65. Weisman, A. D., and Worden, J. W. (1975). Psychosocial analysis of cancer deaths.Omega 6: 61–75.Google Scholar
  66. Weller, S. (1973, June). Work in progress: Maya Angelou.Intellectual Digest, pp. 11–12, 14.Google Scholar
  67. Wills, T. A. (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology.Psychol. Bull. 90: 245–271.Google Scholar
  68. Winnecott, D. W. (1965).The Maturational Process and the Facilitating Environment, International Universities Press, New York.Google Scholar
  69. Wortman, C. B., and Lehman, D. R. (1985). Reactions to victims of life crises: Support attempts that fail. In Sarason, I. G., and Sarason, B. R. (eds.),Social Support: Theory, Research, and Applications, Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronnie Janoff-Bulman
    • 1
  • Hillary J. Morgan
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MassachusettsAmherst
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MassachusettsAmherst

Personalised recommendations