Social Psychology of Education

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 25–46 | Cite as

Student teacher behaviour in response to daily hassles in the classroom

  • Wilfried F. Admiraal
  • Theo Wubbels
  • Fred A. J. Korthagen


In this study, we describe student teacher behaviour in response to daily hassles in the classroom from three perspectives: the coping perspective, representing the meaning of the behaviour in the light of the situations in which it is shown; the pedagogical-methodological perspective, evident in an analysis of the instructional meaning of student teacher behaviour; and the interpersonal perspective, meaning behaviour perceived as part of the teacher-pupil relationship.

Observation of lessons of student teachers yields descriptions of student teacher behaviour in four types of classroom events. Two dimensions of student teacher behaviour have been extracted: the active-passive-dimension, describing the degree of intensity of a student teacher's actions when transferring (verbal) messages to the pupils; and the agitation-harmony-dimension, defining the degree of tension the student teacher arouses in the relationship between teacher and pupils.

Two conclusions are developed. Firstly, in responding to pupils' off-task behaviour, student teachers generally show communication similar to the pupils' behaviour. This means that they are engaged in the same oppositional behaviour as the pupils, which can result in an aggressive symmetrically escalating relationship. Secondly, the newly developed descriptive framework with the two dimensions can be used in future research and in helping supervisors to reveal student teachers' blind spots for what is going on in the classroom during hassling events.


Social Psychology Student Teacher Blind Spot Daily Hassle Teacher Behaviour 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Admiraal, Wilfried F. (1994).Reacties van docenten op aandachteisende situaties in de klas (Teachers' responses to stressful classroom events). Utrecht: W.C.C.Google Scholar
  2. Blase, Joseph J. (1982). A social-psychological grounded theory of teacher stress and burnout.Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(4), 93–113.Google Scholar
  3. Borg, Mark G. (1990). Occupational stress in British educational settings: A review.Education Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 10(2), 103–126.Google Scholar
  4. Brooks, Douglas M. (1985). The teachers communicative competence: The first day of school.Theory into Practice, 24(1), 63–70.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, Christopher & Peterson, Penelope L. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In Merlin C. Wittrock (Ed.),Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan, pp. 255–296.Google Scholar
  6. Commissie Toekomst Leraarschap (1993).Het gedroomde koninkrijk (The dreamed kingdom). Culemborg: Educatieve Partners Nederland.Google Scholar
  7. Créton, Hans, Hermans, Joost, & Wubbels, Theo (1990). Improving interpersonal teacher behaviour in the classroom: A systems communication perspective.South Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 18(2), 85–94.Google Scholar
  8. Créton, Hans A., Wubbels, Theo, & Hooymayers, Herman P. (1989). Escalated disorderly situations in the classroom and the improvement of these situations.Teaching and Teacher Education, 5(3), 205–215.Google Scholar
  9. Doyle, Walter (1986). Classroom organization and management. In Merlin C. Wittrock (Ed.),Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan, pp. 392–431.Google Scholar
  10. Dewe, Philip J. (1985). Coping with work stress: An investigation of teachers' actions.Research in Education, 33, 27–40.Google Scholar
  11. Evertson, Carolyn M. (1989). Improving elementary classroom management: A school-based training program for beginning the year.Journal of Education Research, 83(2), 82–90.Google Scholar
  12. Farell, Dan (1983). Exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect as responses to job satisfaction: A multidimensional scaling study.Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 596–607.Google Scholar
  13. Freeman, Andrea (1987). The coping teacher.Research in Education, 38, 1–38.Google Scholar
  14. Fuller, Frances F. & Bown, Oliver H. (1975). Becoming a teacher. In Kevin Ryan (Ed.),Teacher education. The seventy-fourth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 25–52.Google Scholar
  15. Gage, Nate L. (1978).The scientific basis of the art of teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gifi, Albert (1983).Princals user's guide. Leiden: Department of Datatheory.Google Scholar
  17. Good, Thomas L. & Brophy, Jere R. (1991).Looking in classrooms (5th ed.). New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  18. Hirschman, Albert O. (1970).Exit, voice and loyalty: Response to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hock, Roger R. (1988). Professional burnout among public school teachers.Public Personnel Management, 17(2), 167–189.Google Scholar
  20. Jambu, Michel (1991).Exploratory and multivariate data analysis. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  21. Koetsier, Cor P., Wubbels, Theo, & Driel, Cees van (1992). An investigation into careful supervision of student teaching. In J. H. C. Vonk, J. H. G. I. Giesbers, J. J. Peters, & T. Wubbels (Eds.),New prospects for teacher education in Europe II (Conference proceedings). Amsterdam: U.L.V.U. and H.H., pp. 245–254.Google Scholar
  22. Kyriacou, C. (1980). Coping actions and occupational stress among school teachers.Research in Education, 24, 55–61.Google Scholar
  23. Kyriacou, C. & Sutcliffe, J. (1978). Teacher stress: Prevalence, sources, and symptoms.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 48, 159–167.Google Scholar
  24. Kounin, Jacob S. (1970).Discipline and group management in classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
  25. Lazarus, Richard S. & Folkman, Susan (1984).Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Leary, Timothy (1957).An interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald Press Company.Google Scholar
  27. Litt, Mark D. & Turk, Dennis C. (1985). Sources of stress and dissatisfaction in experienced high school teachers.Journal of Educational Research, 78(3), 179–185.Google Scholar
  28. Mykletun, Reidar J. (1984). Teacher stress; perceived and objective sources, and quality of life.Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 18(1), 17–45.Google Scholar
  29. Ninomiya, Akira & Okato, Toshitaka (1990). A critical analysis of job-satisfied teachers in Japan.Comparative Education, 26(2/3), 249–257.Google Scholar
  30. Peters, Vincent (1985).Docenten en hun probleemsituaties (Teachers and their problem situations). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar
  31. Popping, Roel (1988). On agreement indices for nominal data. In Willem E. Saris & Irmtraud N. Gallhofer (Eds.),Sociometric research, Volume I. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan, pp. 90–105.Google Scholar
  32. Rudow, Bernd (1990). Empirische untersuchungen zur belastung und beanspruchung in lehrerberuf (Empirical research into the stress of teaching).Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 4(2), 75–85.Google Scholar
  33. Schreurs, P.J.G., Willige, G. van de, Tellegen, B., & Brosschot, J.F. (1988).De Utrechtse Coping Lijst: UCL Handleiding (The Utrecht Coping Checklist: UCL Manual). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  34. Tartwijk, Jan van, Fisher, Darrell, Fraser, B., & Wubbels, Theo (1994).The interpersonal significance of molecular behavior of science teachers in lab sessions: A Dutch perspective. Paper presented at NARST annual meeting, Anaheim, CA.Google Scholar
  35. Watzlawick, Paul, Beavin, Janet Helmick, & Jackson, Don D. (1967).The pragmatics of human communication. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  36. Westerhof, K. J. (1989).Effectiviteit van leerkrachtgedrag (Productivity of teacher behaviour). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
  37. Wubbels, Theo, Créton, Hans A., & Holvast, Anne (1988). Undesirable classroom situations: A systems communication perspective.Interchange, 19(2), 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wubbels, Theo, Créton, Hans, Levy, Jack, & Hooymayers, Herman (1993). The model for interpersonal teacher behavior. In Theo Wubbels & Jack Levy (Eds.),Do you know what you look like? London: Falmer Press, pp. 13–28.Google Scholar
  39. Wubbels, Theo & Levy, Jack (Eds.). (1993).Do you know what you look like? London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  40. Wulk, Johannes (1988).Lehrerbelastung (Teachers' stress). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wilfried F. Admiraal
    • 1
  • Theo Wubbels
    • 1
  • Fred A. J. Korthagen
    • 1
  1. 1.IVLOS Institute of EducationUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations