Advertisement

A biomonitoring procedure utilizing negative phototaxis of first instarAedes aegypti larvae

  • D. E. Simonet
  • W. I. Knausenberger
  • L. H. TownsendJr.
  • E. C. TurnerJr.
Article

Abstract

Negative phototaxis of newly hatchedAedes aegypti L. larvae was inhibited by exposure to three heavy metals and five organic insecticides. This response was quantified in an inexpensive multiunit apparatus consisting of four glass troughs perpendicular to a uniform light source. The criterion of toxic effect, established with cupric sulfate as a standard, was: inability of larvae to migrate 30 cm in 60 sec after 8 hr of pre-exposure, designated as 8-hr EC50. The photomigration procedure was more sensitive than our comparative 24-hr acute lethal toxicity tests on metals. The 8-hr EC50 values for cadmium, chromium and copper were 0.6, 2.4, and 1.4 mg/L, respectively. Values for insecticides ranged from 0.003 mg/L for fenitrothion (organophosphate) to 0.39 mg/L for methomyl (carbamate).

Keywords

Copper Heavy Metal Toxicity Chromium Cadmium 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, andWater Pollution Control Federation: Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water. 14 ed. Washington, DC:Amer. Public Health Assoc. (1976).Google Scholar
  2. Barr, A. J., J. H. Goodnight, J. P. Sall, and J. T. Helwig: A user's guide to SAS76. Raleigh, NC:SAS Institute, Inc. (1976).Google Scholar
  3. Barbosa, P. and T. M. Peters: A comparative study of egg hatching techniques forAedes aegypti (L.). Mosquito News29, 548 (1969).Google Scholar
  4. Beesley, W. N.: The activity of sulphonamides and some other chemicals against mosquito larvae. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasit.66, 509 (1972).Google Scholar
  5. Brust, R. A.: Effect of starvation on molting and growth inAedes aegypti andA. vexans. J. Econ. Entomol.61, 1570 (1968).Google Scholar
  6. Burchfield, H. P., A. M. Redder, J. D. Hilchey, and E. E. Storrs: An objective method for insecticide bioassay based on photomigration of mosquito larvae. Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst.17, 57 (1952).Google Scholar
  7. Burchfield, H. P. and A. Hartzell: A new bioassay method for evaluation of insecticide residues. J. Econ. Entomol.48, 210 (1955).Google Scholar
  8. Cairns, J., Jr., K. L. Dickson, and G. Lanza: Rapid biological monitoring systems for determining aquatic community structure in receiving streams. Biological methods for the assessment of water quality. Philadelphia:American Society for Testing and Materials (1973).Google Scholar
  9. Cairns, J., Jr., K. L. Dickson, and G. F. Westlake (Eds.): Biological monitoring of water and effluent quality. Philadelphia:American Society for Testing and Materials (1977).Google Scholar
  10. Calabrese, A., R. S. Collier, D. A. Nelson, and J. R. MacInnes: The toxicity of heavy metals to embryos of the American OysterCrassostrea virginica. Mar. Biol.18, 162 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Das, M., and P. H. Needham: Effect of time and temperature on toxicity of insecticides to insects. I. Tests of DDT on larvae ofAedes aegypti (L.) Ann. Appl. Biol.49, 32 (1961).Google Scholar
  12. Davis, J. C: Important considerations in acute and sublethal bioassay procedures for water quality studies with aquatic life: A review. 2nd annual aquatic toxicity workshop. 1975 Proceedings. Rexdale, Ontario:Ministry of the Environment (1975).Google Scholar
  13. Doudoroff, P.: Keynote address—Reflections on pickle-jar ecology. Biological monitoring of water and effluent quality. Philadelphia:American Society for Testing and Materials (1977).Google Scholar
  14. Finney, D. J.: Probit analysis. 3 ed. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press (1971).Google Scholar
  15. Godin, P. J., J. H. Stevenson, and R. H. Sawicki: The insecticidal activity of Jasmolin II and its isolation from pyrethrum (Chrysanthemum cinerariaefolium Vis.). J. Econ. Entomol.58, 548 (1965).Google Scholar
  16. Gras, G., and J. A. Rioux: Laboratory evaluation of some organophosphorus compounds against the larvae ofAedes (O.) detritus (Haliday),Aedes (O.) caspius (Pallas), andCulex pipiens L. Mosquito News29, 202 (1969).Google Scholar
  17. Kleerekoper, H.: Some monitoring and analytical techniques for the study of locomotor responses of fish to environmental variables. Biological monitoring of water and effluent quality. Philadelphia:American Society for Testing and Materials (1977).Google Scholar
  18. Knausenberger, W. L., and E. C. Turner, Jr.: Negative phototaxis of mosquito larvae as a potential tool in the rapid monitoring of aquatic wastes (Abstract). ASB Bull.22, 34 (1975).Google Scholar
  19. Marking, L. L., and V. K. Dawson: Toxicity of quinaldine sulfate to fish. Invest. Fish Control No. 48.U.S. Fish. Wildl. Serv. Washington, DC (1973).Google Scholar
  20. Matsamura, F.: Toxicology of insecticides. New York: Plenum Press (1975).Google Scholar
  21. Mount, D. I.: Biotic monitoring. Biological Monitoring of Water and Effluent Quality. Philadelphia:American Society of Testing and Materials (1977).Google Scholar
  22. Mulla, M. S., R. L. Metcalf, and G. Katz: Evaluation of new mosquito larvicides with notes on resistant strains. Mosquito News24, 312 (1964).Google Scholar
  23. Mulla, M. S., R. L. Norland, W. E. Westlake, B. Dell, and J. St. Amant: Aquatic midge larvicides, their efficacy and residues in water, soil, and fish in a warm-water lake. Environ. Entomol.2, 58 (1973).Google Scholar
  24. Novak, D., and J. Boudha: Laboratory tests of heavy metals salts as mosquito larvicides. Angew. Parasit.9, 175 (1968).Google Scholar
  25. Peters, T. M., B. J. Chevone, N. C. Greenough, R. A. Callahan, and P. Barbosa: Intraspecific competition inAedes aegypti (L.) larvae. I. Equipment, techniques, and methodology. Mosquito News29, 667 (1969).Google Scholar
  26. Pickering, Q. H., and C. Henderson: The acute toxicities of some heavy metals to different species of warm water fishes. Air Water Poll. Inst. J.10, 453 (1966).Google Scholar
  27. Simonet, D. E., and E. C. Turner, Jr.: Apparatus designed to evaluate the negative phototactic behavior of first instarAedes aegypti. Mosquito News36, 297 (1976).Google Scholar
  28. Sprague, J. B.: Measurement of pollutant toxicity to fish. III. A review paper. Sublethal effects and “safe” concentrations. Water Research5, 245 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Suzuki, K.: The toxic influence of heavy metal salts upon mosquito larvae. Hokkaido University Faculty of Science J. Series 6-Zoology14, 169 (1959).Google Scholar
  30. Turnipseed, S. G., and J. K. Reed: The rate of leaching of dieldrin from attapulgite dry granules. J. Econ. Entomol.56, 410 (1963).Google Scholar
  31. Wallace, R. R., H. B. N. Hynes, and N. Kaushik: Laboratory experiments on factors affecting the activity ofGammarus pseudolimnaeus Bonsfield. Freshwater Biol.5, 533 (1975).Google Scholar
  32. Wigglesworth, V. B.: The principles of insect physiology. 7 ed. New York: Halsted Press, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. (1972).Google Scholar
  33. Wilber, C. G.: The biological aspects of water pollution. Springfield, Ill.: C. Thomas (1969).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. E. Simonet
    • 1
  • W. I. Knausenberger
    • 1
  • L. H. TownsendJr.
    • 1
  • E. C. TurnerJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EntomologyVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburg

Personalised recommendations