Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of pain threshold using a simple pressure algometer

  • Originals
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Pain threshold was measured using a simple pressure algometer in 190 subjects. The measurement had a highly acceptable intra-observer error. Significantly lower pain thresholds were observed in all of the five areas of the body studied in females. The most sensitive area was the forehead. There was a higher pain threshold in the dominant hand. Anxiety and fear of pain significantly reduced the threshold.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beecher, H. K. The measurement of pain. Pharmacol Rev 1957, 9, 59–209.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Keele, K.D. Pain sensitivity tests. The pressure algometer. Lancet 1954, 1, 636–639.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clutton-Brock, J. An improved device for measurement of pain threshold. Anaesthesia 1964, 19, 593–597.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hardy, J.D., Wolff, H.G., Goodell, H. Studies of pain. A new method for measuring pain threshold-observations on spatial summation of pain. J Clin Invest 1940, 19, 649–680.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Robson, J.G., Davenport, H.T., Sugiyama, R. Differentiation of two types of pain by anaesthetics. Anaesthesiology 1969, 26, 217–228.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wolff, B., Kantor, T.C., Jarvik, M.E., Lusha, E. Response of experimental pain to analgesic drugs. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1969, 10, 217–228.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hewer, A.J.H., Keele, C.A. A method of testing analgesics in man. Lancet 1948, 2, 683–688.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Armstrong, D., Dry, R.M.L., Keele, C.A., Markham, J.W. Methods for studying chemical excitants of cutaneous pain in man. J Physiol 1951, 115, 59–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. O'Driscoll, S.L. Pain threshold analysis. Clin Rheum Dis 1976, 2, 27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Orloff, S. Pain tolerance threshold and pain perception threshold: clinical and experimental studies. Clin Rheum Dis 1979, 5, 755–773.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jensen, K., Anderson, H.O., Olesen, J., Lindblom, U. Pressure-pain threshold in human temporal region. Evaluation of a new pressure algometer. Pain 1986, 25, 313–323.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. O'Driscoll, S.L., Jayson, M.I.V. Pain threshold analysis in patients with osteoarthrosis of hip. Br Med J 1974, 3, 714–715.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Huskisson, E.C., Hart, F.D. Pain threshold and arthritis. Br Med J 1972, 4, 193–195.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Campbell, S.M., Clark, S., Tindall, E. A., Forehand, M.E., Bennett, R.M. Clinical characteristics of fibrositis. Arthritis Rheum 1983, 26, 817–824.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Reeves, J.L., Jaeger, B., Graff-Radford, S.B. Reliability of the pressure algometer as a measure of myofascial trigger point sensitivity. Pain 1986, 24, 313–321.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. McClave, J.T., Benson, P.G. Two samples: Estimation and Test of Hypotheses. Statistics for Business and Economics. San Francisco, California, Dellen Publishing Co 1979, 252–269.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sternbach, R.A. Psychophysiology of pain. Int J Psychiat Med 1975, 6, 63–73.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lawis, G.F., Achterberg, J., Kenner, L., Kopetz, K. Ethnic and sex differences in response to clinical and induced pain in chronic spinal pain patients. Spine 1984, 9, 751–754.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hall, K.R.L., Stride, E. The varying response to pain in psychiatric disorders: a study in abnormal psychology. Br J Med Psychol 1954, 27, 48–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Merskey, H., Spear, F.G. The reliability of the pressure algometer. Br J Soc Clin Psychol 1964, 3, 130–136.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chapman, W.P., Jones, C.M. Variations in cutaneous and visceral pain sensitivity in normal subjects. J Clin Invest 1944, 23, 81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Neri, M., Agazzani, E. Aging and right-left asymmetry in experimental pain measurement. Pain 1984, 19, 43–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wolff, B.B., Jarvik, M. Relationship between superficial and deep somatic thesholds of pain with a note on handed-ness. Am J of Psychol 1964, 77, 589–599.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Haslam, D.R. Lateral dominance in the perception of size and of pain. Q J Exp Psychol 1970, 22, 503–507.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hill, H.E., Kornetsky, C.H., Flanary, H.G., Wikler, A. Effects of anxiety and morphine on discrimination of intensities of pain stimuli. J Clin Invest 1952, 31, 473–480.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hill, H.E., Kornetsky, C.H., Flanary, H.G., Wikler, A. Studies on anxiety associated with anticipation of pain. (i). Effects of morphine. Arch Neurol Psych 1952, 67, 612–619.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buchanan, H.M., Midgley, J.A. Evaluation of pain threshold using a simple pressure algometer. Clin Rheumatol 6, 510–517 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02330587

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02330587

Key words

Navigation