Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Vascular anastomoses with absorbable suture material: An experimental study

  • Published:
Annals of Vascular Surgery

Abstract

A synthetic, monofilament, absorbable suture material, polytrimethylene carbonate, was tested to determine its suitability for use in arterial anastomoses. The material studied is a copolymer made of trimethylene carbonate and polyglycolic acid, with a retention time in the tissue of up to six months. In an experimental group of 12 mongrel dogs, using simple end-to-end anastomoses, aortic and femoral patch grafts of bovine heterograft material and iliofemoral bypass implants of 5 mm of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene prostheses were performed and arteriographically and histologically documented. Direct intraindividual comparisons were made with the absorbable (polytrimethylene carbonate) and nonabsorbable (polypropylene, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene suture) materials, a total of 108 anastomoses. No suture material-related complications such as ruptures or suture line aneurysms occurred. Polytrimethylene carbonate sutures led to less inflammation and scar tissue formation than polypropylene sutures. Complete absorption of the suture material by hydrolytic decomposition was followed by an almost complete regeneration in all layers of the vessel wall. Regeneration of the connective tissue structures of the media was noted. Initial associated reactions in the intima eventually disappeared. Both suture materials were equivalent histologically in the early months of the study, but after 10 month follow-up differences were observed, especially in the structure of the media, apart from the fact that polytrimethylene carbonate is absorbed completely after four to seven months.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CALHOUN TR, KITTEN CM. Polypropylene suture—is it safe?J Vasc Surg 1986;4:98–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. RODEHEAVER GT, BORZELLCA DC, THACKER JG, et al. Unique performance characteristics of Novafil.Surg Gynecol Obstet 1987;164:230–236.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. DETERLING RA, COLEMANN CC, KEE J, et al. An experimental evaluation of catgut as a vascular suture material and a report on its clinical use.J Thorac Surg 1952;23:303–309.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. DAHLKE H, DOCIU N, THURAU K. Synthetisches, resorbierbares und synthetisches, nicht resornierbares Nahtmaterial in der mikrovascularen Chirurgie. Tierexperimentelle Studie.Handchirurgie 1979;11:13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  5. DARDIK H, DARDIK I, KATZ AR, et al. A new absorbable synthetic suture in growing and adult primary vascular anastomoses: morphologic study.Surgery 1970;68:1112–1119.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. LEE S, FUNG YC, MATSUDA M, et al. The development of mechanical strength of surgically anastomosed arteries sutured with Dexon.J Biomech 1985;18:81–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. ROSS G, PAVILDES C, LONG F, et al. Absorbable suture material for vascular anastomoses.Am Surg 1981;47:541–548.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. SANDMANN W, TORSELLO G, KASCHNER A, et al. Experimentelle ergebnisse und linische erfahrungen mit PGS-faden in der arterienchirurgie. In: THIEDE AU, HAMELMANN H (eds): Moderne Nahtmaterialien u. Nahttechniken in der Chirurgie. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  9. PAE WS, WALDHAUSEN JA, PROPHET GA, et al. Primary vascular anastomosis in growing pigs. Comparison of polypropylene and polyglycolic acid sutures.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1981;81:921–990.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. BECK C, BLUNCK F, THIEDE A. Förderung der Gefäßwandregeneration durch Verwendung absorbierbarer Nahmaterialien für Mikrogefäßanastomosen. In: THIED A, HAMELMANN H (eds): Moderne Nahtmaterialien in der Chirurgie. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  11. DAHLKE H, DOCIU N, THURAU K. Thrombogenicity of different suture materials as revealed by scanning electron microscopy.J Biomed Mater Res 1980;14:251–261.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. USSIA G, FELDMANN D, GALETTI M, et al. Histopathological aspects of tissue reactivity to suture material in microsurgical arterial anastomosis.Ital J Surg Sci 1985;15: 287–295.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. TORSELLO GB, SANDMANN W, LENZ W, et al. Experimental studies with absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures in infected canine arterial anastomoses.J Vasc Surg 1986;3:135–139.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. TUCHMANN A, DINSTL K. Erste Erfahrungen mit einem monofilen resorbierbaren Nahmaterial in der Gafächirurgie.Angio 1983;5:281–286.

    Google Scholar 

  15. VERSCHUERE I, FRANCOIS K, DE ROOSE J, et al. Polydioxanone suture material in growing vascular anastomoses. Experimental study.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985;90:765–772.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. SCHMITZ-RIXEN T, HORSCH S, KLEIN B, et al. Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Gefäßwandregeneration bei Verwendung eines neuen monofilen, resorbierbaren Nahtmaterials für arterielle Anastomosen.Langenbecks Arch Chir 1984;362:53–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. HARJOLA PT, ALA-KULJU K, HEIKKINEN L. Polydioxanone in cardiovascular surgery.Thorac Cardiovasc Surgeon 1984;32:100–107.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. HOUDART R. Polydioxanone in digestive surgery.Am J Surg 1986;152:268–271.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. MALLON WJ, SEABER AV, URBANIAK JR. A comparison of absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures to vascular response in immature arteries.J Reconstr Microsurg 1986;2:87–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. MYERS JL, WALDHAUSEN JA, PAE WE, et al. Vascular anastomoses in growing vessels: the use of absorbable sutures.Ann Thorac Surg 1982;34:529–536.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. KNOOP M, LUNSTEDT B, THIEDE A. Maxon und PDS—Bewertung physikalischer und biologischer Eigenschaften monofiler, absorbierbarer Nahtmaterialien.Langenbecks Arch Chir 1987;371:13–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. KATZ AR, MUKHER DP, KAGANOV AL, et al. A new synthetic monofilament absorbable suture made from polytrimethylene carbonate.Surg Gynecol Obstet 1985;161:213–219.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. KUO T, HUANG T, HOWNG S. The clinical use of synthetic absorbable suture in vascular surgery.J Formosan Med Assoc 1974;73:45–52.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. TSCHEILIESSNIGG KH, STADLER H, HOFLER H, et al. Resorbierbares Nahtmaterial im Rahmen der Herzund Gefäßchirurgie?Chirurgie 1983;54:738–745.

    Google Scholar 

  25. STEEN S, ANDERSSON L, LOWENHIELM P, et al. Comparison between absorbable and nonabsorbable monofilament sutures for end-to-end arterial anastomoses in growing pigs.Surgery 1984;95:202–207.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. PATEL CB, SYKES PJ, MELVILLE-JONES G. A comparison of polyglycolic acid and polyamide sutures in experimental microvascular anastomoses.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1981;81:921–927.

    Google Scholar 

  27. ERASMI H, HORSCH S, MULLER J, et al. Gefäßersatz kleinkalibriger Arterien—eine neue bovine Kollagenprothese.Langenbecks Arch Chir 1983;360:97–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. SAUVAGE LR, HARKINS HN. Growth of vascular anastomoses: an experimental study of the influence of suture type and suture method with a note on certain mechanical factors involved.Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 1952;91:276–280.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. TAWES RL, ABERDEEN E, BERRY CL. The growth of an aortic anastomosis: an experimental study in piglets.Surgery 1968;64:1122–1127.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. SHARP WV, BELDEN TA, KING PH, et al. Suture resistance to infection.Surgery 1982;91:61–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. JOHNSON J, KIRBY CK. The relationship of the method of suture to the growth of end-to-end arterial anastomoses.Surgery 1950;27:17–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. ALVAREZ-CORDERO R, REYES EL, ALCAZAR MG, et al. Evaluation of polyglycolic acid sutures in vascular surgery.J Surg Res 1973;15:35–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, The University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

    Thomas Schmitz-Rixen MD FACA, Martin Storck MD, Heide Erasmi MD, Peter Schmiegelow MD & Svante Horsch MD

  2. Department of Pathology, The Klinik of the City of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany

    Thomas Schmitz-Rixen MD FACA, Martin Storck MD, Heide Erasmi MD, Peter Schmiegelow MD & Svante Horsch MD

  3. Department of Surgery, The Klinik of Porz on the Rhine, Cologne, Germany

    Thomas Schmitz-Rixen MD FACA, Martin Storck MD, Heide Erasmi MD, Peter Schmiegelow MD & Svante Horsch MD

Authors
  1. Thomas Schmitz-Rixen MD FACA
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin Storck MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Heide Erasmi MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Peter Schmiegelow MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Svante Horsch MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Schmitz-Rixen, T., Storck, M., Erasmi, H. et al. Vascular anastomoses with absorbable suture material: An experimental study. Annals of Vascular Surgery 5, 257–264 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02329383

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02329383

Search

Navigation