Advertisement

Experimental Mechanics

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 38–44 | Cite as

The development of a modified double-cantilever-beam specimen for measuring the fracture energy of rubber to metal bonds

  • D. R. Lefebvre
  • D. A. Dillard
  • H. F. Brinson
Article

Abstract

Rubber to metal bonds are important in a variety of automotive, tire and marine applications. A new technique is discussed for measuring the strain-energy release rates of these adhesively bonded joints in the presence of harsh environments. Guidelines for design and applications are given.

Keywords

Rubber Mechanical Engineer Fluid Dynamics Release Rate Fracture Energy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Stevenson, A., “on the Durability of Rubber/Metal Bonds in Seawater,”Int. J. Adhesion and Adhesives,5 (2),81–91 (April 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Leidheiser, H., Wang, W. andIgetoft, L., “The Mechanism for the Cathodic Delamination of Organic Coatings from a Metal Surface,”Progress in Organic Coatings,11,19–40 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang, W. and Leidheiser, H., “A Model for the Quantitative Interpretation of Cathodic Delamination,” Pourbaix Symp. Volume of the Electrochemical Soc., New Orleans (Oct. 1984).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Koehler, E.L., “The Mechanism of Cathodic Disbondment of Protective Organic Coatings — Aqueous Displacement at Elevated pH,”Corrosion — NACE,40, (1),5–8 (Jan. 1984).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hammond, J.S., Holubka, J.W. andDickie, R.A., J. Coatings Tech.,51,45 (1979).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gent, A.N., “Peel Mechanics for an Elastic-Plastic Adherend,”J. Appl. Polymer Sci.,21,2817–2831 (1977).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ripling, E.J., Mostovoy, S. andPatrick, R.L., Material Res. Stud.,4,129 (1977).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hetényi, H., “Beam on Elastic Foundation,”Ann Arbor, The University of Michigan Press, 9th printing (1971).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kanninen, M.E., “An Augmented DCB Model for Studying Crack Propagation and Arrest,”Int. J. Fract.,9 (1), (March 1973).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gent, A.N. and Meinecke, E.A., “Compression, Bending and Shear of Bonded Rubber Blocks,” Polymer Eng. and Sci.,10 (1), (Jan. 1970).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gent, A.N., Henry, R.L. and Roxburg, M.L. “Interfacial Stresses for Bonded Rubber Blocks in Compression and Shear,” J. Appl. Mech., 855 (Dec. 1974).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang, S.S., Mandel, J.F. and McGarry, F.J., “An Analysis of the Crack Tip Stress Field in DCB Adhesive Fracture Specimens,” Int. J. Fract.,14 (1), (Jan. 1978).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bascon, W.D. et al., “Effect of Temperature on the Adhesive Fracture Behavior of an Elastomer-Epoxy Resin,”J. Adhesion,7,333 (1976).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chai, H., “Bond Thickness Effect in Adhesive Joints and its Significance for Mode I Interlaminar Fracture of Composites,” ASTM STP 893, 209 (1986).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mostovoy, S., Ripling, E.J. andBersh, C.E., “Fracture Toughness of Adhesive JointsJ. Adhesion,3,125 (1971).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dillard, D.A., Liechti, K., Lefebvre, D.R., Lin, C. and Thornton, J.S., “The Development of Alternate Techniques for Measuring the Fracture Toughness of Rubber to Metal Bonds in Harsh Environments,” ASTM STP 981 (1988).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. R. Lefebvre
    • 1
  • D. A. Dillard
    • 1
  • H. F. Brinson
    • 2
  1. 1.Engineering Science and Mechanics DepartmentVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburg
  2. 2.Center for Adhesion ScienceVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburg

Personalised recommendations