Conclusions
-
1.
Equation (5) indicates that the error in an isotropic state of stress does not depend on the properties of the material on which the gage is mounted, but it is a constant for the gage itself. (For example, ifK=+5 percent andν o=0.285, then the error will be +6.1 percent.)
-
2.
Figure 2 indicates that the values of Δ2 become critical for values ofK b from 0.0 to −0.5 and the values of Δ1 become critical for values ofK b less than −2; i.e., for negative values ofK b we will find large percentage errors in either one of the principal stresses except ifK b lies between −0.5 and −2.0. On the other hand, the absolute values of the errors in either one of the principal stresses (i.e., |σi-σ1|) can be of great significance in that range; for example, ifQ 1=−400×10−6,Q 2=+200×10−6,K=5 percent, ν=0.3 andE=30×106 psi (21×1011 dynes/cm2) thenK b=−0.5 and Δ2≅-20 percent
$$\begin{gathered} \therefore \dot \sigma _2 = \frac{E}{{1 - v^2 }}\left( {Q_2 + vQ_1 } \right) = + 2400{\text{ }}psi \hfill \\ \left( {154 \times 10^5 {N \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {N {m^2 }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {m^2 }}} \right) \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$and\(\left( {\dot \sigma _2 - \sigma _2 } \right) = - 480{\text{ }}psi\) (−30.6×105 N/m2). The true value of σ2 would then be +2880 psi (184.3×105 N/m2). In such cases, it is clearly important to take transverse-sensitivity errors into account, specially when theK factor exceeds 2 or 3 percent. For positive values ofK b the percentage errors, in general, are less. Furthermore, the true values of the stresses are then less than the calculated values, so that in such cases it would be unnecessary to make corrections for the transverse sensitivity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- K :
-
transverse sensitivity of the gage
- ε1, ε2:
-
true values of principal strains
- Q 1, Q2 :
-
measured values of strains
- \(\dot \in 1,\dot \in 2\) :
-
principal strains neglecting transverse-sensitivity errors
- \(\dot \sigma _1 ,\dot \sigma _2 \) :
-
principal stresses neglecting the transverse-sensitivity errors
- σ1, σ2:
-
true values of principal stresses
- ν:
-
Poisson's ratio of the material on which the gage is mounted
- ν:
-
Poisson's ratio of the material on which the gage is calibrated
- νa :
-
apparent Poisson's ratio
- Δ1 :
-
error in\(\dot \sigma _1 \) due to transverse sensitivity\( = \frac{{\dot \sigma _1 - \dot \sigma _1 }}{{\dot \sigma _1 }}\)
- Δ2 :
-
error in\(\dot \sigma _2 \) due to transverse sensitivity\( = \frac{{\dot \sigma _2 - \dot \sigma _2 }}{{\dot \sigma _2 }}\)
References
Wu, C. T., “Transverse Sensitivity of Bonded Strain Gages,”Experimental Mechanics,2 (11),338–344 (Nov. 1962).
Meyer, M. L., “A Simple Estimate of the Effect of Cross Sensitivity on Evaluated Strain-gage Measurement,”Experimental Mechanics,7 (11),476–480 (Nov. 1967).
Shelton, A., “An Experimental Investigation of the Cross-Sensitivity of Resistance Strain Gages,”J. of Strain Analysis,3 (2), (April 1968).
Saxena, V. C. andMachin, K. E., “Transverse Sensitivity Errors in Biaxial-Stress Fields,”J. of Strain Analysis,7 (1),41–43 (Jan. 1972).
Murray, W. M., “Strain Gage Techniques,”Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Ch. 23, 634–635 (1963).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Machin, K.E., Hassan, Y.E. Transverse-sensitivity errors in strain-gage measurement. Experimental Mechanics 16, 38–40 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02328921
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02328921