Chromosoma

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 402–428 | Cite as

Structure of chromosomes

I. Morphological studies of the spiral structure of human somatic chromosomes
  • Yasushi Ohnuki
Article

Abstract

The number of gyres, mode, and direction of coils, centromere, secondary constriction, and telomere were studied in the human somatic chromosomes in terms of spiral structure, employing the newly developed technique involving a hypotonic treatment. Results obtained are: 1. the number of gyres is most probably constant in analogous chromosome from different cells; 2. the direction of coils is random; 3. each ehromatid is accepted as a unit of chromonema coiling; 4. the centromere seems to be a regionally elongated portion of the chromonema, without showing any differentiated structure; 5. chromonemata at secondary constrictions usually appear as uncoiled or less tightly coiled entities, and 6. two different types of the telomere structure were observed, one being a pointed-end type, while the other is a rounded-end type (Summary see p. 424).

Keywords

Developmental Biology Somatic Chromosome Spiral Structure Secondary Constriction Hypotonic Treatment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Borenfreund, E., M. Krim, andA. Bendich: Chromosomal aberration induced by hyponitrite and hydroxylamine derivatives. J. nat. Cancer Inst.32, 667–679 (1964).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Brooke, J. H., D. P. Jenkins, R. K. Lawson, andE. Osgood: Human chromosome uncoiling and dissociation. Ann. hum. Genet.26, 139–143 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, S. W.: The structure and meiotic behavior of the differentiated chromosomes of tomato. Genetics34, 437–461 (1949).Google Scholar
  4. Caspersson, T., S. Farber, G. E. Foley, J. Kudynowski, E. J. Modest, E. Simonsson, U. Wagh, andL. Zech: Chemical differentiation along metaphase chromosomes. Exp. Cell Res.49, 219–222 (1968).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cleveland, L. R.: The whole life cycle of chromosomes and their coiling system. Trans. Amer. Phil. Soc.39, 1–100 (1949).Google Scholar
  6. Coleman, L. C.: Chromosome structure in theAcrididae with special reference to the X chromosomes. Genetics28, 2–8 (1943).Google Scholar
  7. Darlington, C. D.: Recent advances in cytology, 2nd ed. p. 671. Philadelphia: Blakiston 1937.Google Scholar
  8. —: The chromosome as a physicochemical entity. Nature (Lond.)176, 1139–1144 (1955).Google Scholar
  9. Denver Study Group: A proposed standard system of nomenclature of human mitotic chromosomes. Acta genet. (Basel)10, 322–328 (1960).Google Scholar
  10. DuPraw, E. J.: Macromolecular organization of nuclei and chromosomes: A folded fibre model based on whole-mount electron microscopy. Nature (Lond.)206, 338–343, (1965).Google Scholar
  11. —: Evidence for a ‘folded-fibre’ organization in human chromosomes. Nature (London)209, 577–581 (1966).Google Scholar
  12. —, andP. M. M. Rae: Polytene chromosome structure in relation to the ‘ foldedfibre’ concept. Nature (Lond.)212, 598–600 (1966).Google Scholar
  13. Evans, H. J.: Chromosome aberrations and target theory. In: Radiation-induced chromosome aberrations, ed. byS. Wolff, p. 8–40. New York: Columbia Univ. Press 1963.Google Scholar
  14. Ferguson-Smith, M. A., M. E. Ferguson-Smith, P. M. Ellis, andM. Dickson: The sites and relative frequencies of secondary constrictions in human somatic chromosomes. Cytogenetics1, 325–343 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Palmer, C. G., andS. Funderburk: Secondary constrictions in human chromosomes. Cytogenetics4, 261–276 (1965).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Patau, K.: Identification of chromosomes. In: Human chromosome methodology, ed.J. J. Yunis, p. 155–186. New York: Academic Press 1965.Google Scholar
  17. Peacock, W. J.: Chromosome duplication and structure as determined by autoradiography. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci., (Wash.)49, 793–801 (1963).Google Scholar
  18. Ris, H.: The structure of meiotic chromosomes in the grasshopper and its bearing on the nature of “chromomeres” and “lamp-brush chromosomes”. Biol. Bull.89, 242–257 (1945).Google Scholar
  19. —: Ultrastructure and molecular organization of genetic systems. Canad. J. Genet. Cytol.3, 95–120 (1961).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. —, andB. L. Chandler: The ultrastructure of genetic systems in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol.28, 1–8 (1963).Google Scholar
  21. Rothfels, K. H., andL. Siminovitch: An air-drying technique for flattening chromosomes in mammalian cells grownin vitro. Stain Technol.33, 73–77 (1958).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Saksela, E., andP. S. Moorhead: Enhancement of secondary constrictions and the heterochromatic X in human cells. Cytogenetics1, 225–244 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Sasaki, M.: Observations on the modification in size and shape of chromosomes due to technical procedure. Chromosoma (Berl.),11, 514–522 (0961).Google Scholar
  24. Sasaki, M. S., andS. Makino: The demonstration of secondary constrictions in human chromosomes by means of new techniques. Amer. J. hum. Genet.15, 24–33 (1963).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Schmid, W.: DNA replication patterns of human chromosomes. Cytogenetics2, 175–193 (1963).Google Scholar
  26. Schrader, F.: Mitosis: The movement of chromosomes in cell division, 2nd ed. New York: Columbia University Press 1953.Google Scholar
  27. Somers, C. E., A. Cole, andT. C. Hsu: Isolation of chromosomes. Exp. Cell Res., Suppl.9, 220–234 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sparvoli, E., H. Gay, andB. P. Kaufmann: Number and pattern of association of chromonemata in the chromosomes ofTradescantia. Chromosoma (Berl.)16, 415–435 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Steefensen, D.: A comparative view of the chromosome. Brookhaven Symp. in Biology12, 103–124 (1959).Google Scholar
  30. Swanson, C. P.: Meiotic coiling inTradescantia. Bot. Gaz.103, 457–474 (1942).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. —: Cytology and cytogenetics. Englewoods Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall 1957.Google Scholar
  32. Swift, H.: Molecular morphology of the chromosome. In Vitro1, 26–49 (1965).Google Scholar
  33. Takagi, N., andA. A. Sandberg: Chronology and patterns of human chromosome replication. VII. Cellular and chromosomal DNA behavior. Cytogenetics7, 118–134 (1968).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Taylor, J. H.: The replication and organization of DNA chromosomes. In: Molecular genetics, part. I (ed.J. H. Taylor), p. 65–111. New York: Academic Press 1963.Google Scholar
  35. Trosko, J. E., andJ. G. Grewen: Cytological observations on the strandedness of mammalian metaphase chromosomes. Cytologia (Tokyo)31, 208–212 (1966).Google Scholar
  36. —, andS. Wolff: Strandedness ofVicia faba chromosomes as revealed by enzyme digestion studies. J. Cell Biol.26, 125–135 (1965).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. White, M. J. D.: The heteropycnosis of sex chromosomes and its interpretation in terms of spiral structure. J. Genet.40, 67–82 (1940).Google Scholar
  38. Wilson, G. B., A. H. Sparrow, andV. Pond: Sub-chromatid rearrangements inTrillium erectum. I. Origin and nature of configuration induced by ionizing radiation. Amer. J. Bot.46, 309–316 (1959).Google Scholar
  39. Wolfe, S. L.: The fine structure of isolated metaphase chromosomes. Exp. Cell Ees.37, 45–53 (1965a).Google Scholar
  40. —: The fine structure of isolated chromosomes. J. Ultrastruct. Res.12, 104–112 (1965b).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. —, andG. M. Hewitt: The strandedness of meiotic chromosomes fromOncopdtus. J. Cell Biol.31, 31–42 (1966).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Yunis, J. J.: Human chromosomes in diseases. In: Human chromosome methodology (ed. J. J. Yunis) p. 187–242. New York: Academic Press 1964.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1968

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yasushi Ohnuki
    • 1
  1. 1.Pasadena Foundation for Medical ResearchPasadena

Personalised recommendations