Skip to main content
Log in

A quartz-crystal-embedded split Hopkinson pressure bar for soft materials

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A dynamic experimental technique that is three orders of magnitude as sensitive in stress measurement as a conventional split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) has been developed. Experimental results show that this new method is effective and reliable for determining the dynamic compressive stress-strain responses of materials with low mechanical impedance and low compressive strengths, such as elastomeric materials and foams at high strain rates. The technique is based on a conventional SHPB. Instead of a surface strain gage mounted on the transmission bar, a piezoelectric force transducer was embedded in the middle of the transmission bar of a high-strength aluminum alloy to directly measure the weakly transmitted force profile from a soft specimen. In addition, a pulse-shape technique was used for increasing the rise time of the incident pulse to ensure stress equilibrium and homogeneous deformation in the low-impedance and low-strength specimen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kolsky H., “An Investigation of Mechanical Properties of Materials at Very High Rates of Loading,”Proc. Phys. Soc. Lon. Ser. B,62,676–700 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Follansbee, P.S., “The Hopkinson Bar,”Mechanical Testing, Metals Handbook,8,9th ed.,American Society for Metals,Metals Park, OH,198–217 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ross, C.A., Jerome, D.M., Tedesco, J.W. andHughes, M.L., “Moisture and Strain Rate Effects on Concrete Strength,”ACI Mat. J.,93,293–300 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, W. andRavichandran, G., “Dynamic Compressive Failure of a Glass Ceramic under Lateral Confinement,”J. Mech. Phys. Solids,45,1303–1328 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, W., Zhang, B., andForrestal, M.J., “A Split Hopkinson Bar Technique for Low-impedance Materials,” EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS,39,81–85 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gamby, D. andChaoufi, J., “Asymptotic Analysis of Wave Propagation in a Finite Viscoplastic Bar,”Acta Mech.,87,163–178 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, L., Labibes, K., Azari, Z., andPluvinage, G., “Generalization of Split Hopkinson Bar Technique to Use Viscoelastic Bars,”Int. J. Impact Eng.,15,669–686 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bragov, A.M. andLomunov, A.K., “Methodological Aspects of Studying Dynamic Material Properties Using the Kolsky Method,”Int. J. Impact Eng.,16,321–330 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao, H., Gary, G., andKlepaczko, J.R., “On the Use of a Viscoelastic Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar,”Int. J. Impact Eng.,19,319–330 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Knauss, W.G., Boyce, M., McKenna, G., andWineman, A., “Nonlinear, Time-dependent Constitution of Engineering Polymers,”Report No. 95-10, Institute for Mechanics and Materials, University of California, San Diego, 1–16 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Graham, R.A., “Technique for Studying Piezoelectricity under Transient High Stress Conditions,”Rev. Sci. Instr.,32,1308–1313 (1961).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wasley, R.J., Hoge, K.G., andCast, J.C., “Combined Strain Gaugequartz Crystal Instrumented Hopkinson Split Bar,”Rev. Sci. Instr.,40,889–894 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Karnes, C.H. andRipperger, E.A., “Strain Rate Effects in Cold Worked High-purity Aluminum,”J. Mech. Phys. Solids,14,75–88 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chalupnik, J.D. andRipperger, E.A., “Dynamic Deformation of Metals under High Hydrostatic Pressure,” EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS,6,547–554 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Togami, T.C., Baker, W.E., andForrestal, M.J., “A Split Hopkinson Bar Technique to Evaluate the Performance of Accelerometers,”Trans. ASME, J. Appl. Mech.,63,353–356 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  16. The User's Guide to Ultrasound and Optical Products, Valpey-Fisher, Hopkinton, MA (1996).

  17. Chen, W. andZhang, X., “Dynamic Response of Epon 828/T-403 under Multiaxial Loading at Various Temperatures,”J. Eng. Mat. Tech., Trans. ASME,119,305–308 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  18. RTV630 High Strength Silicone Rubber GE Silicones Waterford, NY (1999).

  19. Wu, X.J. andGorham, D.A., “Stress Equilibrium in the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Test,”J. Physique IV, Colloque C3,7,91–96 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gray, G.T. III, Blumenthal, W.R., Trujillo, C.P., andCarpenter, R.W. II, “Influence of Temperature and Strain Rate on the Mechanical Behavior of Adiprene L-100,”J. Physique IV, Colloque C3,7,523–528 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, W., Lu, F. & Zhou, B. A quartz-crystal-embedded split Hopkinson pressure bar for soft materials. Experimental Mechanics 40, 1–6 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02327540

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02327540

Key Words

Navigation