Skip to main content
Log in

A moving-load controlled-displacement fracture-toughness testing machine

A testing procedure is described which enables about thirty fracture-toughness values to be obtained from a single specimen. No stress-intensity-factor solution or compliance calibration is required

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In conventional fracture-toughness testing, the line of application of the loads remains fixed with respect to specimen geometry. In this testing machine, the load moves with the advancing crack front, and displacement is used as the controlled variable to propagate and arrest a crack. The energy-release rate at the onset of crack propagation and, hence, the plane-strain fracture toughnessK Ic can be measured directly without compliance calibration or stress-intensity evaluation. The specimen is in the form of a flat plat 25 by 50 cm which is simple to machine and provides about 30 values ofK Ic. The versatility of the machine is demonstrated by making a statistical analysis ofK Ic for 7075-T6 Al by showing the effect of plate thickness on the fracture toughnessK c using a tapered specimen, and by evaluatingK c in 7075 Al as a function of aging temperature in a thermal-gradient-treated specimen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weitzmann, R.H. andFinnie, I., “Measuring Fracture Toughness — A Simplified Approach Using Controlled Crack Propagation,”J. of Matls.,7,294–298 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Freed, C.N. andKrafft, J.M., “Effects of Side Grooving on Measurements of Plane Strain Fracture Toughness,”J. of Matls.,1,770–790 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kirkwood, W.F. andPrado, M.E., “Three Dimensional Stress Distribution of a Double-Cantilever Beam with a Side Notch,”Cracks and Fracture, ASTM STP 601, 262–273 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Weitzmann, R.H. andFinnie, I., “Further Studies of Crack Propagation Using the Controlled Crack Propagation Approach,”ASTM STP 559, 111–126 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Irwin, G.R., “Fracture Mode Transition for a Crack Traversing a Plate,”Trans. ASME, J. of Basic Engrg.,82,417–425 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kaufman, J.G., “Progress in Fracture Testing of Metallic Materials,” Review of Developments in Plane Strain Fracture Toughness Testing.ASTM STP 462,3–21 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pujari, V.K., Finnie, I. & Hauser, F.E. A moving-load controlled-displacement fracture-toughness testing machine. Experimental Mechanics 21, 234–239 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02326846

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02326846

Keywords

Navigation