Abstract
Experimental studies are described in which two different types of air shock are used to induce stress waves in an elastically confined, cylindrical specimen of sand, the objective being to permit direct observation of the effects of unloading on the dynamic response of granular material. In one case, “pure” unloading waves are generated by suddenly subjecting the end of a prestressed specimen to pressures below atmospheric. In the second type of test, the specimens are impacted at one end by an air shock which has the form of a sharp front followed immediately by a rapid exponential decay of pressure. The decay of the shock pressure generates unloading waves which cause attenuation of the wave as it propagates in the granular material.
As a result of the tests, it is suggested that seismic-wave velocity may be correlated to the modulus of unloading cycles in a quasi-static test and that, when strainrate effects are included, a relatively simple model may be used to predict the dynamic response of granular materials.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Stoll, R. D., andEbeido, I. A., “Shock Waves in Granular Soil,”Jnl. Soil Mech. and Foundations Div., ASCE,91 (SM4),107–125 (July1965).
Seaman, L., “Propagation of Dynamic Stresses in Soil,” Proc. Symp. on Soil-Structure Interaction, Univ. of Arizona, Engrg. Rsch. Lab., Tucson, Ariz., 98–104 (September 1964).
Hardin, B. O., and Richart, F. E., Jr., “Elastic Wave Velocities in Granular Soils,” Jnl. Soil Mech. and Foundations Div., ASCE,89 (SM1) (February 1963).
Whitman, R. V., “Nuclear Geoplosics,” Defense Atomic Support Agency, Pt. II, 57 (June 1962).
Stoll, R. D., and Hess, M., “Wave Propagation in an Elastically Restrained Bar of Stress-Relaxing Material,” (presented at the 5th U.S. Natl. Congr. of Applied Mechanics, Minneapolis, Minn., June, 1966).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stoll, R.D., Ebeido, I.A. Unloading effects in the dynamic response of granular soil. Experimental Mechanics 6, 502–507 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02326522
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02326522