Skip to main content
Log in

Application of ultrasonics to detection of fatigue cracks

Investigation indicates that ultrasonic method can be used to advantage because it is not limited to detection of surface cracks, does not require interruption of fatigue test, and can be applied to many materials, regardless of their electrical or magnetic properties

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An ultrasonic system was developed and used to observe the formation of fatigue cracks in centernotched sheet specimens of unalloyed aluminum, two aluminum alloys, a mild steel, and a nickel-base alloy tested in axial tensile fatigue. S-N curves of life-to-initial detectable cracks as well as life-to-fracture were obtained. With the reflection technique, fatigue cracks that ranged in length from 0.0005 to 0.005 in. were detected while the test was in progress. Cracks were detected within approximately 1 to 3 percent of total specimen life for all of the materials considered over the range of stresses considered. The through-transmission technique was utilized to measure relatively long cracks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hunter, M. S., andFricke, W. G., Jr., “Metallographic Aspects of Fatigue Behaviour of Aluminum,”ASTM Proc.,54 (154),717–732;discussion, 733–736 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anctil, A. A., Kula, E. B., andDiCesare, E., “Electric Potential Technique for Determining Slow Crack Growth,”Ibid.,,63,799–808 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Srawley, J. E., and Brown, W. F., Jr., Fracture Toughness Testing, NASA TN D-2599 (1965).

  4. Lyst, J. O., andBabilon, C. F., “Detecting Fatigue Cracks in Notched Fatigue Specimens by Changes in Electrical Resistance,”Matl. Rsch. Std.,2 (6),485 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carlsson, J., Determination of Crack Lengths by Impedance Measurement, Rpt. No. He-988, Aeronautical Rsch. Inst. (Sweden) (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rasmussen, J. G., “Prediction of Fatigue Failure Using Ultrasonic Surface Waves,”Jnl. Soc. Nondestructive Testing,20 (2),103–110 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rublev, Ya. A., andDanilov, Yu. S., “Ultrasonic Detection of Fatigue Cracks During Repeated Static Tests,”Industrial Lab.,29,1306–1309 (Apr. 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hinsley, J. F., Non-destructive Testing, MacDonald and Evans Ltd. London (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carlin, B., Ultrasonics. Second ed., McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., (1960).

  10. Banks, B., Oldfield, G. E., andRawding, H., Ultrasonic Flaw Detection in Metals, Iliffe Books Ltd., London (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brosens, P. J., Hakimi, N. A.G., and Khabbaz, G. R., Detection of Fatigue Damage with Rayleigh Waves, Rpt. No. 60–307, Aeronautical Rsch. Labs. (Aug. 1960).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klima, S.J., Lesco, D.J. & Freche, J.C. Application of ultrasonics to detection of fatigue cracks. Experimental Mechanics 6, 154–161 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02326144

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02326144

Keywords

Navigation