Skip to main content
Log in

A three-dimensional photoelastic method for analysis of differential-contraction stresses

Paper describes method developed for purpose of analyzing the effect of differential thermal contraction in solid-propellant rocket motors

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The property of homogeneous and isotropic contraction accompanying the slow polymerization of a photoelastic epoxy resin is utilized to produce a photoelastic model of the same size and shape, at the elevated cure temperature, as the container in which it was cast. Reducing the temperature of the bonded model-container composite structure through the epoxy material transition-temperature range results in frozen-stress photoelastic patterns which correspond to the forces of mutual elastic restraint of differential thermal contraction.

The requirements for model-prototype similarity and the model-calibration method are discussed. Particular experiments with calibration specimens and with more complex structures in two and three dimensions are described. The validity of the technique is further demonstrated by correlation with a three-dimensional numerical solution.

The properties of a material that was specially developed for use in this new technique are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

a :

Cylinder inner radius, in.

b :

Cylinder outer radius, in.

c :

Half-length of short cylinder, in.

C :

Calibration specimen coefficient

E :

Effective frozen-stress elastic modulus of photoelastic material, psi

E c :

Elastic modulus of container material, psi

f :

Photoelastic frozen-stress fringe value, psi per fringe per in.

h :

Thickness of container, in.

L :

Characteristic length, in.

n :

Observed fringe order, fringes

N :

Observed fringe order per unit slice thickness, fringes per in.

\(\bar N\) :

Observed calibration specimen fringe order per unit thickness, fringes per in. (Subscripts 1, 2, 3 and 4 pertain to the specimen shape, and subscripts C, D and E pertain to specific points in its processing history, see Fig. 1.)

p-q :

Principal stress difference in complex model, psi

Q :

Effective frozen-stress photoelastic figure of merit, fringes per in.

r :

Radial position, in.

T :

Temperature, °C

x,y,z :

Position coordinates of point in complex model

\(\alpha _c\) :

Linear expansion coefficient of container material, in./in.-°C

α:

Linear expansion coefficient* of photoelastic material, in./in.-°C

β:

Factor of proportionality between complex model principal stress difference and reference stress

ε:

Elastic strain, in./in.

Δ:

Differential thermal strain, in./in.

λ:

Factor of proportionality between complex model strain and free differential thermal strain

\(\bar \sigma\) :

Calibration specimen stress, psi

ν:

Effective frozen-stress photoelastic material Poisson's ratio

\(v_c\) :

Poisson's ratio of container material

References

  1. Leven, M. M., “A New Material for Three-Dimensional Photoelasticity,”Proc. SESA, 6 (1),19–28 (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cook, R. D., “Correlation of Variables in Photoelastic Stress Freezing,” University of Illinois Department of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, T.&A.M., Report No. 162, April 1960.

  3. Theocaris, P. S., “Elastoviscous Properties of Epoxy Resins Derived from Creep and Relaxation Tests at Different Temperature,” Brown University Div. of Engineering NSFG 1888/1, April 1960.

  4. Timoshenko, S., “Strength of Materials, Part II,”Second Edition, p.238–241, D. Van Nostrand Co., Inc., New York, 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Frocht, M. M., “Photoelasticity, Vol. I,” p.287, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Frocht, M. M., “Photoelasticity, Vol. II,” p.127, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Daniel, I. M., andDurelli, A. J., “Shrinkage Stresses Around Rigid Inclusions,”Experimental Mechanics 2 (8),240–244 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jessop, H. T., “Equilibrium Equations Along a Stress Trajectory in Three-Dimensions,”Jl. Sci. Instr., 26, 27–31 (January1949).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Messner, A., “Propellant Grain Stress Analysis,” Proceedings of 17th JANAF-ARP-NASA Solid Propellant Group Meeting, Denver, Colo., May 1961.

  10. Durelli, A. J., andLake, R. L., “Some Unorthodox Procedures in Photoelasticity,”Proc. SESA, 9 (1),97–122 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dally, J. W., Durelli, A. J., andRiley, W. F., “A New Method to Lock-in Elastic Effects for Experimental Stress Analysis,”J. Appl. Mech., 25 (2), 189–195 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sampson, R.C. A three-dimensional photoelastic method for analysis of differential-contraction stresses. Experimental Mechanics 3, 225–235 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02325868

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02325868

Keywords

Navigation