Skip to main content
Log in

System identification with reaction-mass devices

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reaction-mass devices are to be used in a dual role: first for the purpose of system identification, and second for the purpose of vibration suppression. Unlike ground-based shakers, reaction-mass devices have a position constraint which must be maintained. A two-part system identification procedure is described which maintains this constraint. In the first part, a new algorithm is used to obtain the impulse response from input-output data. The second part uses the eigensystem realization algorithm to determine linear matrix models of the structure and of the reaction-mass device. This procedure is demonstrated on a small experimental structure. The usefulness of the model for the design of a vibration suppression controller is also demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ewins, D.J., Modal Testing: Theory and Practice, Research Studies Press (1984).

  2. Juang, J.-N., “Optimal Design of a Passive Vibration Absorber for a Truss Beam,”AIAA J. Dynamics, Guidance, and Control,7 (6),733–739 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Miller, D.W. andCrawley, E.F., “Theoretical and Experimental Investigation of Space Realizable Inertial Actuation for Passive and Active Structural Control,”AIAA J. Dynamics, Guidance, and Control,11 (5),449–458 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Duke, J.P., Webb, S., and Vu, H. “Optimal Passive Control of Multi-Degree of Freedom Systems Using a Vibration Absorber,” AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conf., Portland, OR (Aug. 1990).

  5. Juang, J-N andPappa, R.S., “An Eigensystem Realization Algorithm for Modal Parameter Identification and Model Reduction,”AIAA J. Guidance and Control,8,620–627 (Sept.–Oct. 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ho, B.L. and Kalman, R.E., “Effective Construction of Linear State Variable Models from Input/Output Data,” Proc. of 3rd Annual Allerton Conf. on Circuit and System Theory, 449–459 (1965). Also, Regelungstechnik,14,545–548 (1966).

  7. Quan, R., “The Use of Frequency Scanning and the Eigensystem Realization Algorithm in the System Identification of Flexible Structures,” AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conf., Hilton Heads, SC (Aug. 1992).

  8. MATLAB Control System Toolbox User’s Guide, The Math-Works, Inc. (1986).

  9. Alvin, K.F., Park, K.C., and Belvin, W.K., “A Second Order Structural Identification Procedure Via State Space Based System Identification, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conf., Hilton Head, SC (Aug. 1992).

  10. Potter, R. and Olsen, N., “Modal Analysis for the Connoisseur,” Sound and Vibration, 18–25 (Jan. 1988).

  11. MATLAB User’s Guide, The MathWorks, Inc. (1984).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quan, R. System identification with reaction-mass devices. Experimental Mechanics 35, 42–48 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02325833

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02325833

Keywords

Navigation