Residual stress analysis of joints of ceramics and metals
- 88 Downloads
Development of reliable bonding techniques for ceramics and metals is considered to be very important for more useful applications of ceramics to machinery parts. However, a high thermal stress concentration occurs at the corner of bonded interface in ceramics during the bonding process. This occurs because of the difference in thermal properties of the bond materials and reduces the strength of the bonded joint considerably.
The authors have been investigating various methods for effectively decreasing this stress concentration. In this paper, they present theoretical and experimental evidence that the stress concentration can be successfully diminished by varying the apex angle of joints. It is found that the tensile strength of joints increases as the apex angle of metals decreases from 90 deg to 45 deg. It also increases with increasing the apex angle of metals. Numerical calculations confirm these experimental results and the proposed procedure may be useful in the design and manufacture dissimilar joints.
KeywordsTensile Strength Residual Stress Numerical Calculation Fluid Dynamics Experimental Evidence
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Bogy, D.B., “The Plane Solution for Joined Dissimilar Elastic Semistrips Under Tension,”J. Appl. Mech.,42,93 (1975).Google Scholar
- 2.Bogy, D.B., “On the Problem of Edge Bonded Elastic Quarter-Planes Loaded at the Boundary,”Int. J. Solid Struct.,6,1287 (1970).Google Scholar
- 3.Ning, X.S., Okamoto, T., Miyamoto, Y., Koreeda, A. andSuganuma, K., “Effect of Oxide Additive in Silicon Nitride on Interfacial Structure and Strength of Silicon Nitride Joints Brazed with Aluminium,”J. Mat. Sci.,24,2865–2870 (1989).Google Scholar
- 4.Arata, Y., Ohmori, A. andSano, S., “Solid State Reaction Bonding of Non-oxide Ceramics to Metals (Report I)—Bonding of Si 3 N 4 to Al Alloys,”Trans. JWRI,14 (2),79–84 (1985).Google Scholar
- 5.Miyagawa, M., Yada, T., Koguchi, H. andHonzawa, T., “Reliability Evaluation of Joints of Ceramics and Metal (1st Report, Consideration on Thermoelastic-plastic Stress Around the Interface of Joined Dissimilar Materials),”JSME (in Japanese).54 (507),1949–1955 (1988).Google Scholar
- 6.Yada, T., Koguchi, H., Honzawa, T., Kaya, T. andMiyagawa, M., “Reliability Evaluation of Joints of Ceramics and Metals (2nd Report, The Influence of Changing the Shape of a Joint on the Thermal Stress of Joined Dissimilar Materials),”JSME (in Japanese),54 (508),2128–2134 (1988).Google Scholar
- 7.Koguchi, H., Kaya, T., Ohotani, H. andYada, T., “Reliability Evaluation of Joints of Ceramics and Metals (3rd Report, Discussion and Comparison for the Effect of Modification of Joints Geometry upon the Thermal Stress Concentration by Thermoelastic and Thermoelastic-plastic Analysis),”JSME (in Japanese),55 (513),1121–1125 (1989).Google Scholar
- 8.Yada, T. andKoguchi, H., “Reliability Evaluation of Joints of Ceramics and Metal (Consideration of Thermoelastic-plastic Stress Around the Interface of Jointed Dissimilar Materials),”JSME Int. J.,34 (2),163–170 (1991).Google Scholar
- 9.Koguchi, H., Kaneko, T., Kumakura, K. andYada, T., “A Study on the Moderation of Stress Concentration Around the Edge of Ceramics-metal Interface,”JSME (in Japanese),57 (537),1175–1183 (1991).Google Scholar
- 10.Dalgleish, B., Trumble, K.P. andEvans, A.G., “The Strength and Fracture of Alumina Bonded with Aluminum Alloys,”Acta Metall.,37 (7),1923–1931 (1989).Google Scholar
- 11.Burgess, J.F., Neugebauer, C.A. andFlanagan, G., “The Direct Bonding of Metals to Ceramics by the Gas-Metal Eutectic Method,”J. Electrochem. Soc.,122 (5),688–690 (1975).Google Scholar
- 12.Anstis, G.R., Chantikul, P., Lawn, B.R. andMarshall, D.B., “A Critical Evaluation of Indentation Techniques for Measuring Fracture Toughness: I, Direct Crack Measurements,”J. Amer. Cer. Soc.,64 (9),533–538 (1981).Google Scholar
- 13.Chantikul, P., Anstis, G.R., Lawn, B.R. andMarshall, D.B., “A Critical Evaluation of Indentation Techniques for Measuring Fracture Toughness: II, Strength Method,”J. Amer. Cer. Soc.,64 (9),539–543 (1981).Google Scholar