Skip to main content
Log in

Application of an advanced XRD instrument for surface stress-tensor measurements on steel sheets

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The three-dimensional residual-stress condition of several martensitic stainless-steel sheets given various combinations of surface treatments was studied by an X-ray-diffraction method. The stress tensors in the near-surface region, approximately 12 micrometers (0.012 mm) deep, were calculated after obtaining the strain tensors through application of the differential method and an advanced X-ray-diffraction stress-measurement instrument. The advanced instrument collected the data in a few hours—a task that normally requires several days to a few weeks-and provided accuracies on the order of ±14 MPa (2 ksi). The surface treatments to the sheets included various combinations of mechanical polishing and vapor blastiing; all produced substantial compressive stresses in the plane and perpendicular to the surface. The mill-annealed specimen showed nearly zero residual stress prior to mechanical polish or vapor blasting. The resulting tensor-stress data were compared with data obtained through single-exposure-technique calculations which assume a plane-stress state on the surface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ruud, C.O., “A Review of Selected Non-Destructive Methods for Residual Stress Measurement,” NDT Int., 15–23 (Feb. 1982).

  2. Ruud, C.O., “Position-Sensitive Detector Improves X-Ray Powder Diffraction,” Industrial Res. and Dev., 84–87 (Jan. 1983).

  3. Dölle, H., “The Influence of Multiaxial Stress State, Stress Gradients and Elastic Anisotropy on the Evaluation of (Residual) Stress by X-Ray,”J. Appl. Cryst.,12,489–510 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cullity, B.D., “Some Problems in X-Ray Stress Measurements,”Adv. in X-Ray Anal.,20,Plenum Press,259–271 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Soc. Automotive Eng., “Residual Stress Measurement by X-Ray Diffraction-SAE J784a,”Soc. Automotive Eng., Inc., Warrendale, PA (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cullity, B.D., Elements of X-Ray Diffraction, 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Prevey, P.S., “A Method of Determining the Elastic Properties of Alloys in Selected Crystallographic Directions for X-Ray Diffraction Residual Stress Measurement,” Adv. in X-Ray Anal.,20 (1977).

  8. Torbaty, S., Sprauel, J.M., Maeder, G. andMarkho, P.H., “On the X-Ray Diffraction Method of Measurement of Triaxial Stresses with Particular Reference to the Angle Two Theta-Zero,”Adv. in X-Ray Anal.,26,245–253 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruud, C.O., Chen, P.C. Application of an advanced XRD instrument for surface stress-tensor measurements on steel sheets. Experimental Mechanics 25, 245–250 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02325093

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02325093

Keywords

Navigation