Chromatographia

, Volume 25, Issue 5, pp 409–412 | Cite as

Preparation of active ribosomal proteins by HPLC

  • Petra Nowotny
  • Helga Eckardt
  • V. Nowotny
  • Roza Maria Kamp
Originals

Summary

The proteins of the large ribosomal subunit fromEscherichia coli have been separated by size-exclusion, ion-exchange and reversed-phase high-performance-liquid chromatography (HPLC) using various buffer systems. The biological activity of the isolated proteins was tested via their ability to assemble into active 50S subunits (total reconstitution). The activity of the reconstituted subunits was measured with poly(U)-dependent poly-(Phe) synthesis. Reversed-phase HPLC techniques yielded active proteins (80–100%) by application of 2-propanol or acetonitrile. Proteins prepared by size-exclusion chromatography employing ammonium acetate as buffer also gave highly active proteins (70%). On the other hand, separation of the proteins on ion-exchange columns, using urea containing buffers, resulted in reduced activity (up to 50%).

Key Words

Column liquid chromatography Separation of proteins Biological activity after separation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    A. R. Kerlavage, L. Kahan, B. S. Cooperman, Anal. Biochem.12, 342 (1982).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    R. M. Kamp, Z. Y. Yao, A. Bosserhoff, B. Wittmann-Liebold, Hoppe-Seyler's Z. Physiol. Chem.36, 1977 (1983).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    A. R. Kerlavage, C. J. Weitzmann, T. Hasan, B. S. Cooperman, J. Chrom.266, 225 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    R. M. Kamp, B. Wittmann-Liebold, FEBS Lett.167, 59 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    R. M. Kamp, A. Bosserhoff, D. Kamp, B. Wittmann-Liebold, J. Chrom.317, 181 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    R. J. Ferris, C. A. Cowgill, R. R. Traut, Biochemistry23, 3434 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    A. R. Kerlavage, C. J. Weitzmann, M. Cannon, T. Hasan, K. M. Giangiacomo, J. Smith, B. S. Cooperman, Biotechniques, Jan./Feb. issue, 26 (1985).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    P. N. Dalrymple, S. Gupta, F. Regnier, L. L. Houston, Biochem. Biophys. Acta755, 157 (1983).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    R. M. Kamp, J. Brockmöller, B. Wittmann-Liebold, Chromatographia22, 249 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    P. Stiegler, M.-L. Hartmann, J.-P. Ebel, Biochimie68, 587 (1986).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    A. R. Kerlavage, C. J. Weitzmann, B. S. Cooperman, J. Chromatogr.317, 201 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    L. Wiener, R. Brimacombe, Nucl. Ac. Res.15, 3653 (1987).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    M. Herold, K. H. Nierhaus, J. Biol. Chem. in press.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    V. Nowotny, R. P. May, K. H. Nierhaus, in “Structure, Function and Genetics of Ribosomes”, Hardesty, B. and Kramer, G. eds. Springer Verlag. Heidelberg and New York, pp 101–111 (1986).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    K. H. Nierhaus, F. Dohme, Meth. in Enzymol.LIX, 443 (1979).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    B. Wittmann-Liebold, in “Structure, Function and Genetics of Ribosomes”, Hardesty, B. and Kramer, G. eds. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg and New York, pp 326–361 (1986).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    G. Wystup, H. Teraoka, H. Schulze, H. Hampl, K. H. Nierhaus, Eur. J. Biochem.100, 101 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    E. Kaltschmidt, H. G. Wittmann, Anal. Biochem.36, 401 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    H. Schulze, K. H. Nierhaus, Embo J.1, 609 (1982).Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    V. Nowotny, K. H. Nierhaus, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,79, 7238 (1982).Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    P. Birnhuber, F. Schutz, Biochem. J.42, 628 (1984).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Petra Nowotny
    • 1
  • Helga Eckardt
    • 1
  • V. Nowotny
    • 1
  • Roza Maria Kamp
    • 1
  1. 1.Abt. WittmannMax-Planck-Institut für Molekulare GenetikBerlin 33FRG

Personalised recommendations