Advertisement

Experimental Mechanics

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 300–307 | Cite as

Use of mixed-mode stress-intensity algorithms for photoelastic data

  • C. W. Smith
  • O. Olaosebikan
Article

Abstract

A generalization of irwin's method and a new algorithm, called ‘quadratic,’ are proposed for the extraction of mixed-mode stress-intensity factors (SIF) in three-dimensional cracked-body problems. These new algorithms are evaluated along with the existing ones of Smith, Sanford-Dally and Theocaris-Gdoutos, and their SIF results compared.

It is shown that all these algorithms deliver SIF values in good agreement and that they all can be applied reliably to near-tip photoelastic data.

Keywords

Mechanical Engineer Fluid Dynamics Photoelastic Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Smith, C. W. and Olaosebikan, O., “On the Extraction of Stress Intensity Factors from Near Tip Photoelastic Data,” Proc. 1983 SESA Spring Conf. (1983).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smith, C. W., “Use of Photoelasticity in Fracture Mechanics,” Mechanics of Fracture, ed. G.C. Sih,7,Chap. 2 (1981).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sanford, R. J. andDally, J. W., “A General Method for Determining Mixed Mode Stress Intensity Factors from Isochromatic Fringe Patterns,”J. Eng. Frac. Mech.,11 (4),621–634 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gdoutos, E. E. andTheocaris, P. G., “A Photoelastic Determination of Mixed-mode Stress-intensity Factors,”Experimental Mechanics,18 (3),87–97 (March1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Irwin, G. R., “Discussion of ‘The Dynamic Stress Distribution Surrounding a Running Crack—A Photoelastic Analysis,’ by A. A. Wells and D. Post,”Proc. SESA,16,93–96 (1958).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Smith, C. W., Post, D. and Epstein, J. S., “Measurement of Stress and Displacement Fields Near Crack Tips by Optical Methods,” Proc. 1983 SESA Spring Conf. (1983).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sih, G. C. andLiebowitz, H., “Mathematical Theories of Brittle Fracture,”Fracture, An Advanced Treatise,II,Academic Press,New York, Chap. 2 (1968).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smith, C. W. and Hardrath, W. T., “Photoelastic Determination of Stress Intensities for Mode III,” Recent Adv. in Eng. Sci., ed. R. L. Sierakowski, Univ. of Florida Div. of Continuing Education,15,195–200 (1978).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Andonian, A. T., “SIF Distributions in the Part Circular Surface Flaw,” VPI Rept. (1979).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sih, G. C., Paris, P. C. andErdogan, F., “Crack-Tip Stress Intensity Factors for Plane Extension and Plate Bending Problems,”J. Appl. Mech.,29,306–312 (1962).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smith, C. W., Peters, W. H. andAndonian, A. T., “Mixed Mode Stress Intensity Distributions for Part Circular Surface Flaws,”J. Eng. Frac. Mech.,13,615–629 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Olaosebikan, O., “Evaluation of Algorithms for Extracting SIF from Photoelastic Data for 3D Problems,” PhD thesis, VPI & SU (1982).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. W. Smith
    • 1
  • O. Olaosebikan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Engineering Science and MechanicsVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburg

Personalised recommendations