Investigation of displacement fields in an abrasive waterjet drilling process: Part 2. Numerical analysis
In this paper, the displacement fields associated with the abrasive waterjet (AWJ) drilling process were simulated using the finite element method. A threedimensional finite element model was established, and justifiable pressure loads were used in the numerical model to simulate the AWJ drilling process. It was assumed that the pressure load in the AWJ could be resolved into three components, such as impact jet pressure, shear and normal pressure. The effect of these three pressure loads and their magnitudes on the surface displacement were investigated as a function of the jet penetration depth through numerical modeling. Using the hybrid experimental-numerical stress analysis approach, the transient state of stress and strain associated with the notch crest of the jet-induced hole at the impingement zone of the target material during AWJ piercing can be modeled numerically. It was found that the shear contributed the most in shaping the displacement contour patterns and that the jet pressure did not play a dominant role in determining theu field displacement. The jet pressure and shear had the most effect on thev field displacement contour pattern. It was demonstrated that the principal stresses at the bottom of the cavity increase as the depth of the hole increases.
Key WordsMoiré interferometry finite element analysis numerical simulation abrasive waterjet drilling
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Ramulu, M., “Dynamic Photoelastic Investigation on the Mechanics of Waterjet and Abrasive Waterjet Machining,”Opt. Lasers Eng.,19,43–65 (1993).Google Scholar
- 2.Guo, Z, “Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Abrasive Waterjet Drilling of Brittle Materials,” PhD diss., University of Washington (1998).Google Scholar
- 3.Guo, Z. andRamulu, M., “Measurement of Strains Associated with Abrasive Waterjet Drilling of Ceramics,”Proceedings of the 8th American Waterjet Conference,2,Houston, TX,895–905 (Aug. 1996).Google Scholar
- 4.Guo, Z. andRamulu, M., “Modeling the Waterjet Contact/Impact on Target Material,”Proceedings of the 10th American Waterjet Conference,1,Houston, TX,33–53 (Aug. 1999).Google Scholar
- 5.Guo, Z. andRamulu, M., “Simulation of Displacement Fields Associated with Abrasive Waterjet Drilled Hole,”Proceedings of the 10th American Waterjet Conference,1,Houston, TX,271–293 (Aug. 1999).Google Scholar
- 6.Wong, K.-P., “Photoelastic Investigation of Abrasive Waterjet Machining,” master's thesis, University of Washington (1990).Google Scholar
- 7.Ramulu, M. andWong, K.P., “Preliminary Investigations of Abrasive Waterjet Piercing Process by Dynamic Photoelasticity,”Int. J. Waterjet Technol.,1 (2),53–63 (1991).Google Scholar
- 8.Guo, Z. andRamulu, M., “Investigation of Displacement Fields in an Abrasive Waterjet Drilling Process: Part 1. Experimental Measurements,”Experimental Mechanics,41,375–387 (2001).Google Scholar
- 9.ANSYS Corporation, ANSYS User's Manual for Revision 5.3, Canonsburg, PA (1995).Google Scholar
- 10.Tikhomirov, R.A., Babanin, V.B. and Pethukov, E.N., “High-pressure Jetting,” ASME Press Translations, New York (1992).Google Scholar