Skip to main content
Log in

Optimized hole shapes in a tall beam

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper follows a recent paper in EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS also dealing with optimization. The objectives besides the attempt at optimizations of the design of in-plane loaded tall beams are (1) to discuss the properties of some of the designs obtained, and (2) to compare and evaluate experimental and numerical methods. The optimal hole shape introduced in the beam decreases its weight, has an approximately uniform tangenital stress along its boundary and does not increase the maximum tensile stress present originally in the solid beam. The numerical method used is based on finite-element analysis and nonlinear programming. The experimental method is based on photoelasticity. Emphasis is placed on the results obtained rather than on the description of the methodologies. Practical difficulties, assumptions, accuracy, and the applicability of the two methods are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Conway, H.D., Chow, L. andMorgan, G.W., “Analysis of Deep Beams,”ASME J. Appl. Mech.,18 (2),163–172 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Durelli, A.J., “Discussion of Deep Beams,”ASME J. Appl. Mech.,18 (4),421–422 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cardenas, A.E., Hanson, J.M., Corley, W.G. andHognestad, E., “Design Provisions for Shear Walls,”Proc. J. Amer. Concrete Inst.,70 (3),221–230 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Durelli, A. and Ranganayakamma, B., “Optimization Process in Tall Beams,” Experimental Mechanics,259–265 (1988).

  5. Azarm, S., Bhandarkar, S. and Durelli, A., “On the Experimental vs. Numerical Shape Optimization of a Hole in a Tall Beam,” Advances in Design Automation, ed. S.S. Rao, ASME Publ., No. DE,14,257–264 (1988).

  6. Juvinall, R.C., “Enineering Construction of Stress, Strain and Strength,”McGraw-Hill, New York (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Haftka, R.T. andGrandhi, R.V., “Structural Shape Optimization — a Survey,”Computer Methods in Appl. Mech. and Eng.,57,91–106 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fleury, C., “Computer Aided Optimal Design of Elastic Structures,”Computer Aided Optimal Design: Structural and Mechanical Systems, ed. C.A. Mota Soares, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 831–900 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  9. PDA Engineering, “PATRAN-G user's Guide,” I&II (1984).

  10. Durelli, A.J. and Riley, W.F., Introduction to Photomechanics, Prentice-Hall (1965).

  11. Durelli, A.J. andRajaiah, K., “Lighter and Stronger,” EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS,20 (11),369–380 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Durelli, A.J., Azarm, S. & Bhandarkar, S. Optimized hole shapes in a tall beam. Experimental Mechanics 29, 424–431 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02323862

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02323862

Keywords

Navigation