Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluating educational programs: A symposium

  • Published:
The Urban Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Alvin M. Weinberg, “But Is the Teacher Also a Citizen?” Science, August1965, 149, pp.601–606.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ibid., pp.601.

    Google Scholar 

  3. U.S. Office of Education, First Annual Report,pp. 97–98.

  4. An excellent paper on formal evaluation byRobert E. Stake is a case in point, “The Countenance of Educational Evaluation,” Teachers College Record, April1967, 68:7, pp.523–540.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stepen K. Bailey andEdith K. Mosher, ESEA, The Office of Education Administers a Law.Syracuse, N. Y.:Syracuse University Press, 1968, pp.189–192.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ibid., pp.179–181.

    Google Scholar 

  7. ESEA,Section 205 (a) (5).

  8. |Ibid.

  9. |Ibid.

  10. SeeEugene J. Webb et al., Unobtrusive Measures: Nonreactive Research in the Social Sciences.Chicago:Rand McNally and Company, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  11. For a dramatic example of this, seeCharles H. Stember, “Evaluating Effects of the Integrated Classroom,” The Urban Review, June1968, 2:7, pp.3–4 and 30–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bailey and Mosher, p. 162.

  1. Elizabeth Herzog, Some Guide Lines for Evaluative Research.Washington, D. C.:U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Social Security Administration, Children's Bureau, 1959, pp.9–36.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Charles R. Wright andHerbert H. Hyman, “The Evaluators,” inPhillip E. Hammond, editor, Sociologists at Work.New York:Basic Books, 1964, pp.121–141.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Edward A. Suchman, Evaluative Research: Principles and Practice in Public Service and Social Action Programs.New York:Russell Sage Foundation, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Detailed treatment of this model is given in Herbert Hyman, Survey Design and Analysis.Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press, 1955; Hans L. Zetterberg, On Theory and Verification in Sociology.Totowas, New Jersey: The Bedminister Press, 1963; and Paul F. Lazarfeld and Morris Rosenberg, editors, The Language of Social Research.Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press, 1955.

  5. Abraham Kaplan, The Conduct of Inquiry.San Francisco:Chandler Publishing Company, 1964, pp.381–82.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gideon Sjoberg andRoger Nett, A Methodology for Social Research.New York:Harper and Row, 1968, pp.70–76.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Edward A. Suchman, “Principles and Practice of Evaluative Research,” inJohn T. Doby, editor, An Introduction to Social Research.New York:Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967, pp.327–351.

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. Stuart Chapin, Experimental Designs in Sociological Research.New York:Harper and Brothers, 1947 (rev. 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Edward A. Suchman, “A Model for Research and Evaluation on Rehabilitation,” inMarvin Sussman, editor, Sociology and Rehabilitation.Washington:Vocational Rehabilitation Administration, 1966, pp.52–70.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Joseph F. McCloskey andFlorence N. Trefethen, editors, Operations Research for Management.Baltimore:Johns Hopkins Press, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Evaluating educational programs: A symposium. Urban Rev 3, 4–22 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02322249

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02322249

Keywords

Navigation