Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of biaxial stresses on high-cycle fatigue-crack propagation

High-cycle fatigue-crack propagation under biaxial stress is studied in cruciform-geometry aluminum sheet specimens utilizing a composite I-section biaxial beam loaded in four-point bending

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Arising from a design study, an examination has been made of the problems associated with evaluating the fatigue behavior of an I-beam section joined to a transverse stiffener, loaded in biaxial bending. A laboratory test rig has been designed to study high-frequency (40–230 Hz) fatigue-crack propagation in the tensile flange of a composite aluminum I-section, for a range of stress biaxiality ratios (λ) from 0 to +1 (equibiaxial tension), λ being varied by adjusting the ratios of loading spans in the two orthogonal axes for the same amount of uniaxial deflection.

The results obtained are considered in the context of the significantly contradictory information currently available in the literature. Crack geometry and test procedure (as influenced by load/stress measurement) are found to considerably influence the effect of biaxial stresses on fatigue. Thus, the growth rate of corner-initiated cracks increases with increasing stress biaxiality (monitored in terms of nominal applied stresses), but the reverse is true for center-cracked specimens. When tests are conducted in terms of combinations of local stresses, or data reduced using corrections, there is no significant effect of biaxial stresses on fatigue-crack growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Toor, P.M., “A Unified Engineering Approach to the Prediction of Multiaxial Fatigue Fracture of Aircraft Structures,”Eng. Fract. Mech.,7,731–741 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Paris, P.C. and Sih, G.C., “Stress Analysis of Cracks,” ASTM Special Technical Publication No. 381, 30–81 (1965).

  3. Engineering Sciences Data, Aeronautical Series, Fatigue sub-series,4,Crack Propagation in Sheet 8 (1975).

  4. Joshi, S.R. andShewchuck, J., “Fatigue-crack Propagation in a Biaxial-stress Field,”Experimental Mechanics,10 (12),529–533 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Habétínek, J., “Fatigue Strength and Fatigue Failure at Complicated States of Stress,”Eng. Fracture Mech.,8,677–698 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Swift, T., “The Application of Fracture Mechanics in the Development of DC-10 Fuselage,” AGARD AG-176, NATO (Ed. H. Liebowitz), 226–293 (1974), after Ref. 35, Fig. 35b.

  7. Kibler, J.J. andRoberts, R., “The Effect of Biaxial Stresses on Fatigue and Fracture,”J. Eng. Ind., Trans. ASME,92,727–734 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hopper, C.D. andMiller, K.J., “Fatigue Crack Propagation in Biaxial Stress Fields,”J. Strain Anal.,12,23–28 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leevers, P.S., Radon, J.C. andCulver, L.E., “Fatigue crack retardation induced by stress biaxiality variations,”Int. J. Fracture,13,874–876 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Erdogan, F. andRatwani, H., “Fracture of Cylindrical and Spherical Shells Containing a Crack,”Nuc. Eng. and Design,20,265–286 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Roberts, R. and Pothiraj, S., “The Effect of Biaxial Stresses and Combined Stresses on Fatigue and Fracture,” 2nd Int. Conf. on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, Berlin, Paper L8/3 (Sept. 1973).

  12. Liu, A.F., Allison, J.E., Dittmer, D.F. and Yamane, J.R., “Effect of Biaxial Stresses on Crack Growth,” Proc. 11th National Symposium on Fracture Mechanics, Blacksburg, VA (June 1978).

  13. Brown, M.W. andMiller, K.J., “A Theory for Fatigue Failure under Multiaxial Stress-Strain Conditions,”Proc., Instn. Mech. Engrs.,187,745–755 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hopper, C.D., “Biaxial Fatigue Crack Propagation,” PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge (1977).

  15. Miller, K.J., “Fatigue Under Complex Stress,”Metal Sci. J.,11,432–438 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Parsons, M.W. andPascoe, K.J., “Development of a Biaxial Fatigue Testing Rig,”J. Strain Anal.,10,1–9 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ritchie, R.O., “Influence of Microstructure on Near-Threshold Fatigue Crack Propagation in Ultra-High Strength Steel,”Metal Sci. J.,11,368–381 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pook, L.P., “Practical Implications of the Fatigue Crack Growth Threshold,”ibid.,11,382–389 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Charvat, I.M.H. and Garrett, G.G., “The Development of a Closed-loop, Servo-hydraulic Test System for Direct Stress Monotonic and Cyclic Crack Propagation Studies under Biaxial Loading,” J. Testing and Evaluation, in press.

  20. Du Plessis, D.P., “Fatigue Design of Steel Structures: A Review,” The Civil Engineer in South Africa, 231–234 (Sept. 1975).

  21. Charvat, I.M.H., “The Development of Testing Methods for Static and Fatigue Crack Propagation Studies under Biaxial Stress,” MSc Thesis, University of Cape Town (1977).

  22. Hirt, M.A. andFisher, J.M., “Fatigue Crack Growth in Welded Beams,”Eng. Fracture Mech.,5,415–429 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Richards, K.J., “Fatigue Strength of Welded Structures,”British Welding Institute, Cambridge, Rept. (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Smithells, C.J., Metals Reference Book, 5th Edn., Butterworths, London (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Frost, N.E., Pook, L.P. andDenton, K., “A Fracture Mechanics Analysis of Fatigue Crack Growth for Various Materials,”Eng. Fracture Mech.,3,109–126 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pearson, S., “The Effect of Mean Stress on Fatigue Crack Propagation in Half-Inch (12.7 mm) Thick Specimens of Aluminium Alloys of High and Low Fracture Toughness,”Eng. Fracture Mech.,4,9–24 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Plumbridge, W.J., “Mechanico-environmental Effects in Fatigue,”Mat. Sci. and Eng.,27,197–208 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ellison, E.G. andAndrews, J.M.H., “Biaxial Cyclic High Strain Fatigue of Aluminium Alloy RR 58,”J. Strain Anal.,8,209–219 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lohr, R., Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bristol, unpublished work.

  30. Adams, N.J.I., “Some Comments on the Effect of Biaxial Stress on Fatigue Crack Growth and Fracture,”Eng. Fracture Mech.,5,983–991 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Miller, K.J. andKfouri, A.P., “An Elastic-Plastic Finite Element Analysis of Crack Tip Fields under Biaxial Loading Conditions,”Int. J. Fracture,10,393–404 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ritchie, R.O., Smith, R.F. andKnott, J.F., “Effect of Thickness of Fibrous Fracture from a Notch and on Fatigue-Crack Propagation in Low-Strength Steel,”Metal Science J.,9,485–492 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Knott, J.F., “Fundamentals of Fracture Mechanics,”Butterworth, London (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Parsons, M.W. andPascoe, K.J., “Low-cycle Fatigue under Biaxial Stress,”Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs.,188,657–671 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Liebowitz, H., Lee, J.D. and Subramonian, N., “Theoretical and Experimental Biaxial Studies,” Proc., Symp. on Fracture Mechanics, Washington, D.C. (Sept. 1978), ‘Fracture Mechanics’, University Press of Virginia, 593–628 (1978).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garrett, G.G., Anderson, P.R.G. & Charvat, I.M.H. The influence of biaxial stresses on high-cycle fatigue-crack propagation. Experimental Mechanics 20, 44–52 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02321033

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02321033

Keywords

Navigation