Skip to main content
Log in

Improving strain-measurement accuracy when using shunt calibrations

Paper presents a method of measuring strains by using a single shunt calibration to simulate the bridge unbalances for both tension and compression strains

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

It is conventional practice to consider shunt calibration of a strain-gage bridge in a manner which can result in erroneous tension-strain measurements. For strains from 1 percent to 10 percent as encountered increasingly in today’s structural materials and composites, the measured tension strains can be significantly lower than the actual strain. These errors are eliminated by using the method of determining ‘equivalent strains’ which is presented here. Shunt-calibration output is equated separately to tension-and compression-strain outputs to determine the ‘equivalent strain’ to be used for the reduction of each.

Equivalent-strain equations are given for the most commonly used bridge configurations. For the common quarter bridge, the relationship between positive strain and shunt-calibration resistance is found to be a simple linear relationship for all strain levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

R :

bridge-arm resistance

ΔR :

change in arm resistance

Rsh :

shunt-calibration resistance

V :

bridge input voltage

e o :

bridge open-circuit output voltage

e o /V :

bridge output per volt input

ε:

strain

F :

gage factor=(ΔR)/(Rε)

References

  1. Bostwick, W. B. andMcDonald, H. C., “Strain Gage Bridge Output,”Instruments and Control Systems,34,875 (May 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dove, R. C. andAdams, P. H., “Experimental Stress Analysis and Motion Measurement,”80, 117–124, 245–251, Charles E. Merrill Books, Inc., Columbus, OH (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Harting, D. R., “Compensating a Semiconductor Load Cell,” SESA, Proc. of Semi-Annual Tech. Conf., Seattle, WA (May 1962).

  4. Perry, C. C. andLissner, H. R., “The Strain Gage Primer,”265, 159–162, McGraw-Hill Book Co., NY (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dickson, G. E., “Shunt Calibration of Strain Gage Transducers,”Instruments and Control Systems,39,131 (April 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wu, C. T., “Transverse Sensitivity of Bonded Strain Gages,”Experimental Mechanics,2 (11),338 (Nov. 1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Perry, C. C., “Errors Due to Transverse Sensitivity in Strain Gages,” Proc. of Tech. Sess. by Tech. Comm. on Strain Gages, 9–19, (May 13, 1969), Philadelphia, PA, Soc. for Exp. Stress Analysis.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Troke, R.W. Improving strain-measurement accuracy when using shunt calibrations. Experimental Mechanics 16, 397–400 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02320698

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02320698

Keywords

Navigation