Skip to main content
Log in

Stability experiments on the strongest columns and circular arches

The stability and practicality of least-weight columns and arches, designed to carry the maximum possible load without buckling, arevaluated

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent theories predict the cross-sectional shapes for the strongest, end-loaded column and the radially loaded arch whose neutral axis is circular. These tapered shapes have higher predicted load-carrying capacities than uniform columns or arches of equal weight and length or span. The purpose of the present experimental investigation was to study the stability of these configurations, modified so that no experimental model had the predicted cross-sectional area of zero where the bending moments vanished. Precise buckling loads were measured on metal models of tapered, pinned-end columns using strain gages and a unique modification of Southwell's method. The dynamic stability of these end-loaded columns under transverse vibrations was observed. Static stability tests were also performed on Plexiglas models of the strongest shaped circular arch and on the uniform circular arch of equal weight and span. The predicted buckling loads for the strongest shapes agreed reasonably well with measurements. The shaped circular arch, however, was found to be an inefficient design for loading applied uniformly across the span rather than in the radial direction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lagrange, J. L., “Sur la Figure des Colonnes,” Miscellanea Taurinensia,5 (1770–1773). Summarized in I. Todhunter and K. Pearson, A History of the Theory of Elasticity and of the Strength of Materials, Cambridge Press, England,1,66–67 (1886).

  2. Clausen, T., “Uber lie Form architektonischer Saulen,” Bulletin physico-mathematiques et astronumiques, 279–294 (1849). Summarized in 1. Todhunter and K. Pearson, A History of the Theory of Elasticity and of the Strength of Materials, Cambridge Press, England 2,325–339 (1893).

  3. Keller, J. B., “The Shape of the Strongest Column,”Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis,5,275–285 (1960).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Tadjbakhsh, I. andKeller, J. B., “Strongest Columns and Isoperimetric Inequalities for Eigenvalues,”Jnl. Appl. Mech., ASME 29,159–264 (1962).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Southwell, R. V., “On the Analysis of Experimental Observations in Problems of Elastic Stability,”Proc. Royal Soc. of London,135,Series A,601–615 (1932).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Keller, J. B. andNiordson, F. I., “The Tallest Column,”Jnl. of Math. and Mech.,16,433–446 (1966).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilson, J. F., “Dynamic Response of Beams to Moving Pressure Loads as Related to Tracked Air Cushion Vehicles,”The Shock and Vibration Bulletin,40,Part 4,47–62 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wu, C. H., “The Strongest Circular Arch,”Jnl. of Appl. Mech., ASME,35,476–481 (1968).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Timoshenko, S. P. andGere, J. M., Theory of Elastic Stability, 2nd ed., McGraw Hill Book Co., New York, 297 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Temple, G., andBickley, W. G., Rayleigh's Principle, Oxford Univ. Press, London (1933).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Formerly a Graduate Fellow, Duke University

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilson, J.F., Holloway, D.M. & Biggers, S.B. Stability experiments on the strongest columns and circular arches. Experimental Mechanics 11, 303–308 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02320583

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02320583

Keywords

Navigation