Skip to main content
Log in

Experiment as an aid to structural seismic design

  • The William M. Murray lecture
  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An overview of the available methods for simulating or estimating seismic effects on buildings and similar structural models as well as onin situ structures is given. The motivation is provided by noting severe damage even to modern buildings in the wake of strong earthquakes. The complex inelastic behavior of members and connections must be determined experimentally. Such information is essential for developing mathematical design models.

Four available test methods, with examples, are described. One of these is the pseudo-static method of testing where a specimen is subjected to apriori selected cyclic forces or displacements. The second, the pseudo-dynamic method of testing, combines the above procedure with an on-line computer. In employing this approach it is possible to apply a random sequence of displacements corresponding to a previously recorded earthquake while taking into account the continuously changing structural stiffness. The third procedure employs a shaking table programmed to apply scaled earth-quake input based on available accelerograms. The fourth, a nondestructive method of testing of actual structures, consists of recording and interpreting ambient or forced vibrations in the elastic regime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Timoshenko, S.P., History of Strength of Materials, McGraw-Hill (1953).

  2. Rosenberg, N. and Vincenti, W.G., The Britannia Bridge: The Generation and Diffusion of Technical Knowledge, MIT Press (1978).

  3. Bolt, B.A., “Causes of Earthquakes,” in Earthquake Engineering, ed. R.L. Wiegel, Prentice-Hall, 21–45 (1970).

  4. Housner, G.W., “Strong Ground Motion,” and “Design Spectrum,” in Earthquake Engineering, ed. R.L. Wiegel, Prentice-Hall, 75–106 (1970).

  5. Velestos, A.S. andNewmark, N.M., “Effect of Inelastic Behavior on the Response of Simple Systems to a Strong Motion Earthquake,”Proc. 3rd World Conf. Earthquake Eng., New Zealand,II,663–682 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berg, G.V., “A Study of the Earthquake Response of Inelastic Systems,” Preliminary Report, Earthquake Response of Steel Frames, AISI (Feb. 1966).

  7. Popov, E.P. and Franklin, H.A., “Steel Beam-to-Column Connections Subjected to Cyclically Reversed Loading,” Preliminary Report, Earthquake Response of Steel Frames, AISI (Feb. 1966).

  8. Committee on Natural Disasters, “El-Asnam, Algeria Earthquake, October 10, 1980,” Earthquake Eng. Res. Inst. (Jan. 1983).

  9. Viwathanatepa, S., Popov, E.P. andBertero, V.V., “Seismic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Interior Beam-Column Subassemblages,”Rep. No. UCB/EERC-79/14, Earthquake Eng. Res. Ctr., Univ. of California, Berkeley (June 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Forzani, B., Popov, E.P. andBertero, V.V., “Hysteretic Behavior of Lightweight Reinforced Concrete Beam-Column Subassemblages,”Rep. No. UCB/EERC-79/01, Earthquake Eng. Res. Ctr, Univ. of California, Berkeley (April 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Eligehausen, R., Popov, E.P. andBertero, V.V., “Local Bond Stress-Slip Relationships of Deformed Bars Under Generalized Excitations,”Rep. No. UCB/EERC-83/23, Earthquake Eng. Res. Ctr., Univ. of California, Berkeley (Oct. 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Popov, E.P., “Bond and Anchorage of Reinforcing Bars Under Cyclic Loading,”ACI J.,81 (4),340–349 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Popov, E.P. andBlack, R.G., “Steel Struts Under Severe Cyclic Loading,”J. Struct. Div., ASCE,117 (ST 9),1857–1881 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Popov, E.P., etal., “Cyclic Behavior of Large Beam-Column Assemblies,”Earthquake Spectra,1 (2),203–238 (Feb. 1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Takanashi, K., et al., “Nonlinear Earthquake Response Analysis of Structures by a Computer-Actuator On-Line System,” Bul. Earthquake Resistant Structure Res. Inst., Inst. of Industrial Sci., Univ. of Tokyo.8 (1975).

  16. Okada, T., “Computer-Actuator On-Line System at Institute of Industrial Science, University of Tokyo,” A Brief Note, Session 2, First Planning Group Mtg., U.S.-Japan Cooperative Res. Prog. Utilizing Large-Scale Testing (Sept. 1977).

  17. Watabe, M., et al., “Feasibility of Pseudo-Dynamic Testing System,” Progress Rep., U.S.-Japan Large Scale Aseismic Experiments for Building Structures, Building Res. Inst., Ministry of Construction, 13th Joint Mtg., U.S.-Japan Panel on Wind and Seismic Effects, Tsukuba, Japan (1981).

  18. Okomoto, S., et al., “A Progress Report on the Full-Size Seismic Experiment of a Seven Story Reinforced Concrete Building,”Building Res. Inst., Ministry of Construction, Tsukuba, Japan (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mahin, S.A. and Williams, M.E., “Computer Controlled Seismic Performance Testing,” 2nd ASCE-EMD Specialty Conf. on Dynamic Response of Structures, Atlanta, GA (Jan. 1981).

  20. Shing, P.-S.B. andMahin, S.A., “Experimental Error Propagation in Pseudodynamic Testing,”Rep. No. UCB/EERC-83/12, Earthquake Eng. Res. Ctr., Univ. of California, Berkeley (June 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Udagawa, K., Takanashi, K. and Kato, B., “Effects of Displacement Rates on the Behavior of Steel Beams and Composite Beams,” 6th Mtg., U.S.-Japan Joint Tech. Coordinating Mtg., Maui, HI (June 1985).

  22. Popov, E.P., Mahin, S.A. andClough, R.W., “Inelastic Response of Tubular Steel Offshore Towers,”J. Struct. Eng., ASCE,111 (10),2240–2258 (Oct. 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Okomoto, S., et al., “Testing, Repair and Strengthening, and Retesting of a Full-Scale Seven-story Reinforced Concrete Building,” SP-84, Earthquake Effects on Reinforced Concrete Structures, U.S.-Japan Res., ACI (1985).

  24. Foutch, D.A., et al., “Construction of Full Scale Six Story Steel Test Structure,” 4th U.S.-Japan Joint Tech. Coordinating Committee Mtg., Tsukuba, Japan (June 1983).

  25. Yamanouchi, H., et al., “Experimental Results on a K-braced Steel Structure under Seismic Loading Utilizing Full-Scale Six-Story Test Structure,” Proc., Annual Tech. Session of SSRC, San Francisco, CA (1984).

  26. Bertero, V.V., et al., “U.S.-Japan Cooperative Earthquake Research Program: Earthquake Simulation Tests and Associated Studies of a 1/5th-Scale Model of a 7-Story Reinforced Concrete Test Structure,”Rep. No. UCB/EERC-84/05, Earthquake Eng. Res. Ctr., Univ. of California, Berkeley (June 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wallace, B.J. andKrawinkler, H., “Small-Scale Model Experimentation on R/C Assemblies—U.S. Japan Research Program,”Rep. No. 79, John A. Blume Earthquake Eng. Res. Inst., Stanford Univer., Stanford, CA (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yoshimura, M. and Kurose, Y., “Inelastic Behavior of the Building,” SP-84, Earthquake Effects on Reinforced Concrete Structures, U.S.-Japan Res. Prog., ACI, 163–201 (1985).

  29. Committee on Earthquake Engineering Research, “Earthquake Engineering Research—1982,”Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, Nat. Res. Council, Nat. Academy Press, Washington, D.C. (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Penzien, J., et al., “Feasibility Study for Large-Scale Earthquake Simulator Facility,”Rep. No. EERC 67-1, Earthquake Eng. Res. Ctr., Univ. of California, Berkeley (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Stephen, R.M., et al., “Structural Dynamic Testing Facilities at the University of California, Berkeley,”Rep. No. EERC 69-8, Earthquake Eng. Res. Ctr., Univ. of California, Berkeley (Aug. 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sause, R. andBertero, V.V., “A Transducer for Measuring the Internal Forces in the Columns of a Frame-Wall Reinforced Concrete Structure,”Rep. No. UCB/EERC-83/05, Earthquake Eng. Res. Ctr., Univ. of California, Berkeley (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Aktan, A.E. et al., “Experimental and Analytical Predictions of the Mechanical Characteristics of a 1/5-Scale Model of a 7-Story R/C Frame-Wall Building Structure,”Rep. No. UCB/EERC-83/13, Earthquake Eng. Res. Ctr., Univ. of California, Berkeley (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  34. B.R.I. Steel Group, “Phase I Test Results,” U.S.-Japan Cooperative Earthquake Program—Full-Scale Tests of a Six-Story Steel Building, 6th Joint Tech. Coordinating Committee Mtg., Maui, HI (June 1985).

  35. Aktan, A.E. andBertero, V.V., “Measuring Internal Forces of Redundant Structures,”Experimental Mechanics,25 (4),367–375 (Dec. 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bouwkamp, J.G. and Rea, D., “Dynamic Testing and the Formulation of Mathematical Models,” in Earthquake Engineering, ed. R.L. Wiegel, Prentice-Hall, 151–165 (1970).

  37. Petrovski, J. et al., “Dynamic Behavior of a Multistory Triangular-Shaped Building,”Rep. No. EERC 76-3, Earthquake Eng. Res. Ctr., Univ. of California, Berkeley (Oct. 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hudson, D.E., “Dynamic Tests of Full-Scale Structures,” in Earthquake Engineering, ed. R.L. Wiegel, Prentice-Hall, 127–150 (1970).

  39. U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, “Earthquake Investigations in California, 1934–1935,”Spec. Publ. No. 201, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, D.C. (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kawasumi, K. and Kanai, K., “Small Amplitude Vibration of Actual Buildings,” Proc. 1st World Conf. Earthquake Eng., Berkeley, CA (1956).

  41. Ward, H.S. andCrawford, R., “Wind Induced Vibrations and Building Modes,”Bul., Seism. Soc. Amer.,56,793–813 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Popov, E.P. Experiment as an aid to structural seismic design. Experimental Mechanics 26, 194–208 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02320015

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02320015

Keywords

Navigation